Dementia Family Caregivers’ Willingness to Pay for an In-home Program to Reduce Behavioral Symptoms and Caregiver Stress
Our objective was to determine whether family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) are willing to pay for an in-home intervention that provides strategies to manage behavioral symptoms and caregiver stress and to identify predictors of willingness-to-pay (WTP).
During baseline interviews of a randomized trial and before treatment assignment, caregivers were asked how much they were willing to pay per session for an eight-session program over 3 months. We stratified the sample into those who refused to provide a WTP, those willing to pay $US0, and those willing to pay > $US0. We used a two-part model, controlling for demographic characteristics, to predict adjusted mean WTP and to examine associations between WTP, clinical features (cognition, function, behavioral symptoms), and time spent assisting PwD with daily activities. First, we used logistic regression to model the probability a caregiver was willing to pay > $US0. Second, we used a generalized linear model (log link and Gamma distribution) to estimate the amount caregivers were willing to pay conditional on WTP > $US0.
Of 250 dyads enrolled, 226 (90%) had complete data and were included in our analyses. Of 226 dyads, 26 (11%) refused to provide a WTP value, 72 (32%) were willing to pay $US0, and 128 (57%) were willing to pay > $US0. In the combined model, mean adjusted WTP was $US36.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.72–45.27) per session. Clinical features were not significantly associated with WTP. One additional hour providing PwD assistance was associated with a $US1.64 (95% CI 0.23–3.04) increase in WTP per session.
As caregivers spend more time assisting with daily activities, they are willing to pay more for a supportive program.
Clinical Trial Registration Number
EJ, LTP, KM, LNG: study design and analysis. All authors participated in the interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript, and approval of final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This dataset is available upon request from the senior author (Dr. Laura N. Gitlin).
This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (Grant #R01 AG041781-01A1).
Conflicts of interest
EJ, DS, LTP, KM, QS, CVP, and LNG have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. LNG is an inventor of a training program for the TAP intervention for which Johns Hopkins University is entitled to fees. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
- 2.Grand JH, Caspar S, Macdonald SW. Clinical features and multidisciplinary approaches to dementia care. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:125–47.Google Scholar
- 4.Jutkowitz E, Kuntz KM, Dowd B, Gaugler JE, MacLehose RF, Kane RL. Effects of cognition, function, and behavioral and psychological symptoms on out-of-pocket medical and nursing home expenditures and time spent caregiving for persons with dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(7):801–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gaugler JE, Kane RL. Family caregiving in the new normal. San Diego: Academic Press; 2015.Google Scholar
- 8.Committee on Family Caregiving for older adults (2016) National Academies of Sciences, engineering, and medicine. In: Schulz R, Eden J (eds) Families caring for an aging America. National Academies Press, Washington.Google Scholar
- 9.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease: 2016 Update. 2016. 1–93. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/205581/NatlPlan2016.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2018.
- 10.Gitlin LN, Maslow K. Research summit on dementia care, building evidence for services and supports. 2017. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/258446/Mtg26-Slides4.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2018.
- 12.Gitlin L, Hodgson N, Choi S, Marx KA. Interventions to address functional decline in persons with dementia: closing the gap between what a person “Does Do” and what they “Can Do”. In: Park Z, Bondi J, editors. Neuropsychology of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- 13.Graff MJ, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Thijssen M, Dekker J, Hoefnagels WH, Olderikkert MG. Effects of community occupational therapy on quality of life, mood, and health status in dementia patients and their caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(9):1002–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E, Nyman JA. Economic evaluations of behavioral interventions. In: Gitlin LN, Czaja S, editors. Behavioral intervention research: designing, evaluating, and implementing. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2015. p. 333–57.Google Scholar
- 22.McIntosh E, Clarke P, Frew EJ, Louviere JJ. Applied methods of cost-benefit analysis in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 25.Gustavsson A, Jönsson L, McShane R, Boada M, Wimo A, Zbrozek AS. Willingness-to-pay for reductions in care need: estimating the value of informal care in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(6):622–32.Google Scholar
- 26.Oremus M, Tarride JE, Pullenayegum E, Clayton N, Canadian Willingness-to-Pay Study Group, Raina P. Patients’ willingness-to-pay for an Alzheimer’s disease medication in Canada. Patient. 2013;6(3):161–8.Google Scholar
- 28.Gitlin LN, Piersol CV, Hodgson N, Marx K, Roth DL, Johnston D, et al. Reducing neuropsychiatric symptoms in persons with dementia and associated burden in family caregivers using tailored activities: design and methods of a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;49:92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.Google Scholar
- 33.Gitlin LN, Roth DL, Burgio LD, Loewenstein DA, Winter L, Nichols L, et al. Caregiver appraisals of functional dependence in individuals with dementia and associated caregiver upset: psychometric properties of a new scale and response patterns by caregiver and care recipient characteristics. J Aging Health. 2005;17(2):148–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Pizzi L, Jutkowitz E, Prioli K, Gitlin LN, Fortinsky RH. Cost analysis plan and caregivers’ willingness to pay for COPE-CT: interim findings. innovation in aging. 2017;1(suppl_1):96.Google Scholar