Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best–Best Discrete Choice Experiment
- 658 Downloads
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognised as a growing clinical and public health problem in many countries, owing to disability and death from stroke associated with the condition, high hospitalisation costs and an increasing prevalence with ageing populations. Under-treatment with oral anticoagulants has been a significant challenge of treatment, historically related to patient concerns over the safety and convenience of warfarin, which until recently was the only oral anticoagulant available.
The aim of this study is to examine: (1) patient preferences for attributes of warfarin and the new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) in AF; (2) which attributes are most important; and (3) whether current under-treatment is likely to improve with the new oral anticoagulants.
This study was conducted in Melbourne, Australia, with members of the general public with or without AF aged ≥40 years, where those without AF proxy for newly-diagnosed patients. Participants completed a computerised best–best discrete choice experiment (and follow-up interview) as if they had AF with a moderate-to-high risk of stroke. Choice data were modelled using mixed rank-ordered logit. Relative value was explored via estimation of marginal rates of substitution with predicted probability analysis used to simulate potential uptake of oral anticoagulants.
Seventy-six participants were recruited and completed the study. Efficacy (stroke risk) was more important than safety (bleed risk, antidote), which were both considerably more important than convenience factors (blood tests, dose frequency, drug or food interactions). Cost was also important. Predicted use of the new oral anticoagulants (and under-treatment of AF) using simulation, given moderate-to-high risk of stroke, is 25 % (52 %), 54 % (29 %) and 70 % (21 %) assuming a market price of AUD$120/month, AUD$30/month (subsidised price) and AUD$30/month with an antidote, respectively.
Based on the study sample and the modelled attributes, the overall profiles of the new oral anticoagulants were preferred to warfarin as their cost decreased. Public subsidisation and the development of antidotes (such as vitamin K for warfarin) for the new oral anticoagulants may have a positive effect on the under-treatment of AF.
KeywordsWarfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Oral Anticoagulant Stroke Risk
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. All authors had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
PG and EL initiated the research and designed the study with SZ. PG and EL undertook the data collection, follow-up interviews and data analyses. PG and EL drafted the manuscript with input from SZ. PG and EL will act as guarantors for the paper. They accept full responsibility for the conduct of the study and controlled the decision to publish.
Approval was obtained from the Monash University Human Ethics Committee (MUHREC). Project Number: CF12/0783–2012000337. All participants gave informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants in the study are not identifiable. Consent was obtained for the study with the provision that participant responses would remain anonymous.
This study was funded by the Centre for Health Economics, Monash University. No other specific funding was received.
- 3.Stewart S, Murphy NF, Walker A, McGuire A, McMurray JJV. Cost of an emerging epidemic: an economic analysis of atrial fibrillation in the UK. [Erratum appears in Heart. 2007 Nov; 93(11):1472 Note: Murphy, N [corrected to Murphy, N F]]. Heart. 2004;90(3):286–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pengo V, Crippa L, Falanga A, Finazzi G, Marongiu F, Palareti G, et al. Questions and answers on the use of dabigatran and perspectives on the use of other new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a consensus document of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA). Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(5):868–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Alonso-Coello P, Montori VM, Sola I, Schunemann HJ, Devereaux P, Charles C, et al. Values and preferences in oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, physicians’ and patients’ perspectives: protocol for a two-phase study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:221.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Lip GYH, Andreotti F, Fauchier L, Huber K, Hylek E, Knight E, et al. Bleeding risk assessment and management in atrial fibrillation patients: a position document from the European Heart Rhythm Association, endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis. Europace. 2011;13(5):723–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285(18):2370–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Abstract presentations from the AABB Annual Meeting and TXPO. Transfusion. 2009;49.Google Scholar
- 53.Abstract Presentations from the AABB Annual Meeting and CTTXPO. Transfusion. 2010;50.Google Scholar
- 54.Aspirin. MIMS. 2012. http://www.mims.com.au. Accessed 15 March 2012.
- 55.Warfarin. MIMS. 2012. http://www.mims.com.au. Accessed 15 March 2012.
- 56.Rivaroxaban. MIMS. 2012. http://www.mims.com.au. Accessed 15 March 2012.
- 59.Moulds RTGLCEG. Therapeutic guidelines: cardiovascular. West Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines; 2012.Google Scholar
- 60.Rietbrock S, Heeley E, Plumb J, van Staa T. Chronic atrial fibrillation: incidence, prevalence, and prediction of stroke using the Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age > 75, Diabetes mellitus, and prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack (CHADS2) risk stratification scheme. Am Heart J. 2008;156(1):57–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 64.McFadden D. In: Zarembka P (ed). Frontiers of econometrics.: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- 67.Schiele F, van Ryn J, Canada K, Newsome C, Sepulveda E, Park J et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: functional and structural characterization. Blood. 121(18):3554–62.Google Scholar
- 69.Inglis S, McLennan S, Dawson A, Birchmore L, Horowitz JD, Wilkinson D, et al. A new solution for an old problem? Effects of a nurse-led, multidisciplinary, home-based intervention on readmission and mortality in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(2):118–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar