Advertisement

PharmacoEconomics

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 819–824 | Cite as

Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment: Developments to Date

  • Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Leading Article

Abstract

Health technology assessment (HTA) uses a multidisciplinary approach to answer relevant questions regarding the safety, efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of health technologies. There is growing interest in implementing HTA methods at the hospital level because it could facilitate decision-making regarding acquisition, implementation or discontinuation of technologies or interventions within the hospital. First, this article provides an overview of current international experiences and knowledge of hospital-based HTA. Then, it presents the different types of hospital-based HTA, providing examples of each of these models, as well as their strengths and limitations. Finally, it proposes a set of emerging issues that could help inform decision-makers who consider implementing hospital-based HTA, or other stakeholders interested in the field.

Keywords

Health Technology Assessment Hospital Level Health Technology Assessment Agency Health Technology Assessment Process Health Technology Assessment Recommendation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partly based on a knowledge synthesis that was conducted for the Canadian Health Services Foundation for Research (Grant # CHS-2419). No specific funding was received in relation to this article. Marie-Pierre Gagnon holds the Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Technologies and Practices in Health. She has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Granados A. Health technology assessment and clinical decision making: which is the best evidence? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15(3):585–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Heath. HTA in hospitals. 2010. http://www.cadth.ca/en/products/environmental-scanning/health-technology-update/htupdate-issue-13/hta-in-hospitals.
  3. 3.
    Favaretti C, Cicchetti A, Guarrera G, Marchetti M, Ricciardi W. Health technology assessment in Italy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):127–33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, Dibidino R, Corio M. Hospital based health technology assessment world-wide survey. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi), Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment Sub-interest Group. 2008. http://www.gisapitalia.it/nl/072011/pdf/1.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Martelli N, Lelong AS, Prognon P, Pineau J. Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in university hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: learning from international experience. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):185–91. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng D, Martin J. Evidence-based practice and health technology assessment: a call for anesthesiologists to engage in knowledge translation. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(4):354–63. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9463-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(2):263–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saaid H. The impact of health technology assessment on decision-making processes in public versus not-for-profit private hospitals. Am J Med. 2011;2(2):72–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sampietro-Colom L, Morilla-Bachs I, Gutierrez-Moreno S, Gallo P. Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(4):460–5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gagnon M-P, Abdeljelil AB, Desmartis M, et al. Opportunities to promote efficiency in hospital decision-making through the use of health technology assessment. CHSRF series of reports on cost drivers and health system efficiency: paper 7. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Attieh R, Gagnon MP. Implementation of local/hospital-based health technology assessment initiatives in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(4):445–51. doi: 10.1017/S026646231200058X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonsson E. History of health technology assessment in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):42–52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ehlers L, Vestergaard M, Kidholm K, Bonnevie B, Pedersen PH, Jorgensen T, et al. Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: a new concept of decision support in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(3):295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grundstrom JP. Mini-HTA trends for medical devices in the Nordics. 16th Annual International Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lettieri E, Masella C, Nocco U. Budgeting and health technology assessment: first evidence obtained from proposal forms used to submit the adoption of new technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):502–10. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenstein AH, O’Daniel M, Geoghan K. Assessing new technology: how are other hospitals facing the challenge? Healthc Financ Manag. 2003;57(10):70–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gallego G, van Gool K, Kelleher D. Resource allocation and health technology assessment in Australia: views from the local level. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(2):134–40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Catananti C, Cicchetti A, Marchetti M. Hospital-based health technology assessment: the experience of Agostino Gemelli University Hospital’s HTA unit. Ital J Public Health. 2011;2(2):23–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bodeau-Livinec F, Simon E, Montagnier-Petrissans C, Joel ME, Fery-Lemonnier E. Impact of CEDIT recommendations: an example of health technology assessment in a hospital network. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):161–8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306050975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martelli N, van den Brink H, Denies F, Dervaux B, Germe AF, Prognon P, et al. Hospital-based health technology assessment in France: how to proceed to evaluate innovative medical devices? Ann Pharm Fr. 2014;72(1):3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2013.09.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Umscheid CA, Williams K, Brennan PJ. Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1352–5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1476-9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McGregor M. Impact of TAU reports. Technology Assessment Unit (TAU) of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), McGill University Health Centre; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martin J. Pan-Canadian Network for Hospital-Based HTA: next steps. Hospital/Regional HTA Symposium: Local Evidence-Based Decisions for Health Care Sustainability. Ottawa; 2013.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Banken R. L’ETMIS au Québec—dimensions organisationnelles. L’expérience du secteur de la santé. Rencontre INESSS établissements universitaires du secteur des services sociaux ETMISS: Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS); 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Recherche du CHU de QuébecHôpital St-François D’AssiseQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of NursingUniversité LavalQuebec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations