Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Docetaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel in Adjuvant Treatment of Regional Breast Cancer in New Zealand
- First Online:
There have been recent important changes to adjuvant regimens and costs of taxanes for the treatment of early breast cancer, requiring a re-evaluation of comparative cost effectiveness. In particular, weekly paclitaxel is now commonly used but has not been subjected to cost-effectiveness analysis.
Our aim was to estimate the cost effectiveness of adjuvant docetaxel and weekly paclitaxel versus each other, and compared with standard 3-weekly paclitaxel, in women aged ≥25 years diagnosed with regional breast cancer in New Zealand.
A macrosimulation Markov model was used, with a lifetime horizon and health system perspective. The model compared 3-weekly docetaxel and weekly paclitaxel versus standard 3-weekly paclitaxel (E1199 regimen) in the hospital setting. Data on overall survival and toxicities (febrile neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy) were derived from relevant published clinical trials. Epidemiological and cost data were derived from New Zealand datasets. Health outcomes were measured with health-adjusted life-years (HALYs), similar to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs included intervention and health system costs in year 2011 values, with 3 % per annum discounting on costs and HALYs.
The mean HALY gain per patient compared with standard 3-weekly paclitaxel was 0.51 with weekly paclitaxel and 0.21 with docetaxel, while incremental costs were $NZ12,284 and $NZ4,021, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of docetaxel versus 3-weekly paclitaxel was $NZ19,400 (purchasing power parity [PPP]-adjusted $US13,100) per HALY gained, and the ICER of weekly paclitaxel versus docetaxel was $NZ27,100 ($US18,300) per HALY gained. In terms of net monetary benefit, weekly paclitaxel was the optimal strategy for willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds >$NZ27,000 per HALY gained. However, the model was highly sensitive to uncertainty around survival differences, while toxicity-related morbidity had little impact. Thus, if it was assumed that weekly paclitaxel and docetaxel had the same efficacy, docetaxel would be favoured over weekly paclitaxel.
Both weekly paclitaxel and docetaxel are likely to be cost effective compared with standard 3-weekly paclitaxel. Weekly paclitaxel was the optimal choice for WTP thresholds greater than $NZ27,000 per HALY gained (PPP-adjusted $US18,000). However, uncertainty remains around relative survival benefits, and weekly paclitaxel becomes cost ineffective versus docetaxel if it is assumed that the two regimens have equal effectiveness. Reduced uncertainty about the relative survival benefits may improve decision making for funding.
- 1.Ministry of Health. Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2013.Google Scholar
- 3.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of breast cancer in women: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2005.Google Scholar
- 4.New Zealand Guidelines Group. Management of early breast cancer: evidence-based best practice guideline. Wellington; 2009.Google Scholar
- 5.Ferguson T, Wilcken N, Vagg R, Ghersi D, Nowak AK. Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (4):CD004421. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004421.pub2.
- 6.Breast Cancer Disease Site Group. Adjuvant taxane therapy for women with early-stage, invasive breast cancer. Program in Evidence-based Care Evidence-Based Series No. 1–7 Version 2. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario; 2011.Google Scholar
- 7.National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre. Recommendations for use of taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of early (operable) breast cancer: clinical practice guideline. Sydney (NSW): Cancer Australia; 2008.Google Scholar
- 8.National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.PHARMAC. Proposal to widen access to docetaxel: consultation letter. Wellington: PHARMAC; 2011.Google Scholar
- 10.Wolowacz SE, Cameron DA, Tate HC, Bagust A. Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(6):925–33. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Au HJ, Golmohammadi K, Younis T, Verma S, Chia S, Fassbender K, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) for node-positive breast cancer: modeling the downstream effects. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(3):579–87. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0034-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ward S, Simpson E, Davis S, Hind D, Rees A, Wilkinson A. Taxanes for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(40):1–144.Google Scholar
- 17.Limwattananon S, Limwattananon C, Maoleekulpairoj S, Soparatanapaisal N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node positive primary breast cancer. J Med Assoc Thail. 2006;89(5):690–8.Google Scholar
- 19.PHARMAC. New Zealand pharmaceutical schedule, vol. 18, no. 1. PHARMAC; Wellington; 2011.Google Scholar
- 20.PHARMAC. New Zealand pharmaceutical schedule: vol. 18 , no. 2. PHARMAC; Wellington; 2011.Google Scholar
- 21.PHARMAC. New Zealand pharmaceutical schedule: section H for hospital pharmaceuticals. PHARMAC; Wellington; 2011.Google Scholar
- 25.Giménez Poderós T, Gaminde Inda I, Iruin Sanz A, Napal Lecumberri V. Taxanos en el tratamiento adyuvante del cáncer de mama con ganglios positivos: metanálisis [Taxanes in the adjuvant therapy of breastcancer with positive nodes: a meta-analysis]. Farm Hosp. 2005;29:75–85.Google Scholar
- 26.Blakely T, Foster R, Wilson N, Bode3 Team. Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost-Effectiveness (BODE3) Study Protocol. Version 2.0. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; 2012.Google Scholar
- 27.Salmond C, Crampton P, Atkinson J. NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago; 2007.Google Scholar
- 29.Costilla R, Atkinson J, Blakely T. Incorporating ethnic and deprivation variation to cancer incidence estimates over 2006–2026 for the ABC-CBA model. Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost-Effectiveness Programme—Technical Report No. 5. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; 2011.Google Scholar
- 30.Blakely T, Costilla R, Soeberg M. Cancer excess mortality rates over 2006–2026 for ABC-CBA. Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost-Effectiveness programme, Technical Report No. 10. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; 2012.Google Scholar
- 31.Kvizhinadze G, Blakely T. Projected New Zealand lifetables. Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost-Effectiveness Programme (BODE3). Technical Report: No. 4. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington; 2011.Google Scholar
- 33.Martin M, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ruiz A, Alba E, Calvo L, Ruiz-Borrego M, et al. Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide alone or followed by Paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(11):805–14. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Salomon JA, Vos T, Hogan DR, Gagnon M, Naghavi M, Mokdad A, et al. Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2129–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61680-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, Sadeghi S, Martin M, Chan A, et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequential docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(29):3877–84. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ellis P, Barrett-Lee P, Johnson L, Cameron D, Wardley A, O’Reilly S, et al. Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT): an open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9676):1681–92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60740-6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1431–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Loesch D, Greco FA, Senzer NN, Burris HA, Hainsworth JD, Jones S, et al. Phase III multicenter trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel compared with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):2958–65. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):976–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Hershman DL, Weimer LH, Wang A, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Fuentes D, et al. Association between patient reported outcomes and quantitative sensory tests for measuring long-term neurotoxicity in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant paclitaxel chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125(3):767–74. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1278-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Pharmaco (NZ) Limited. Data sheet: paclitaxel ebewe injection concentrate. Auckland; 2011.Google Scholar
- 46.Foster R, Blakely T, Wilson N, O’Dea D. Protocol for direct costing of health sector interventions for economic modelling (including event pathways). Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago; 2012.Google Scholar
- 48.Statistics New Zealand. Gross domestic product. 2013. http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/economic_indicators/GDP/GrossDomesticProduct_HOTPDec12qtr/Tables.aspx. Accessed 17 May 2013.
- 49.World Health Organization. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE): cost-effectiveness thresholds. 2013. http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_thresholds/en/. Accessed 17 May 2013.
- 53.Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, Dal Lago L, Donnelly JP, Kearney N et al. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(1):8–32. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013.
- 55.Ministry of Health. The price of cancer: the public price of registered cancer in New Zealand. Wellington: University of Otago; 2011.Google Scholar
- 56.Ministry of Health, District Health Boards New Zealand. Purchase Unit Data Dictionary (PU DD) 2011/2012; 2011.Google Scholar
- 57.Ministry of Health. Guide to the National Travel Assistance (NTA) Policy 2005: August 2009. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2009.Google Scholar
- 58.The National Pricing Programme Casemix Cost Weights Project Group. New Zealand casemix framework for publicly funded hospitals (including WIESNZ11 methodology and casemix purchase unit allocation) for the 20011/12 financial year: specification for implementation on NMDS. Wellington: District Health Boards New Zealand, Ministry of Health; 2011.Google Scholar
- 59.Ministry of Health. WIESNZ11 cost weights. Ministry of Health, Wellington. 2011. http://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/data-references/weighted-inlier-equivalent-separations/wiesnz11-cost-weights. Accessed 7 March 2013.