Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial
- 362 Downloads
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been increasingly applied as a technique for multi-criteria decision analysis in healthcare. The AHP can aid decision makers in selecting the most valuable technology for patients, while taking into account multiple, and even conflicting, decision criteria. This tutorial illustrates the procedural steps of the AHP in supporting group decision making about new healthcare technology, including (1) identifying the decision goal, decision criteria, and alternative healthcare technologies to compare, (2) structuring the decision criteria, (3) judging the value of the alternative technologies on each decision criterion, (4) judging the importance of the decision criteria, (5) calculating group judgments, (6) analyzing the inconsistency in judgments, (7) calculating the overall value of the technologies, and (8) conducting sensitivity analyses. The AHP is illustrated via a hypothetical example, adapted from an empirical AHP analysis on the benefits and risks of tissue regeneration to repair small cartilage lesions in the knee.
KeywordsAnalytic Hierarchy Process Decision Alternative Analytic Network Process Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Local Weight
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest. Marjan Hummel contributed to conceptualizing the paper, developing the procedural steps of the AHP and the hypothetical case study, and to writing the draft manuscript and revising the final manuscript. John Bridges contributed to conceptualizing the paper, and reviewing and revising the drafts and final manuscript. Maarten IJzerman contributed to the conceptualization of the paper, the development of the hypothetical case study, and reviewing and revising the drafts and final manuscript. Marjan Hummel acts as a guarantor for the content of the article.
- 15.Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.Google Scholar
- 21.Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 2008;1(8):83–98.Google Scholar
- 29.Ishizaka A, Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(11):14336–45.Google Scholar
- 38.Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Decision making with the analytic network process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2006.Google Scholar
- 41.Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- 44.von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1986.Google Scholar