Defining an ‘older’ patient in the context of therapeutic decision making: perspectives of Australian pharmacists and nurses
- 61 Downloads
Our aim was to explore Australian nurses and pharmacist’s perspectives on defining an ‘older’ patient in the context of decision making around pharmacotherapy.
A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews, facilitated by a purpose-designed interview guide.
Practitioners were recruited from the primary care (i.e. registered community pharmacists, registered community nurses, general practice nurses) and tertiary care settings (i.e. referral hospitals, specialist clinics).
Non-prescribing health professionals directly involved in medication management (i.e. nurses, pharmacists) with experience in caring for older patients.
This exploratory study identified three key themes: (1) defining ‘older’ patients is difficult, given the heterogeneity of the population; (2) age is more than a number and, therefore, cannot be used alone for tailoring and managing a patient’s treatment; and (3) a contemporary definition of an ‘older’ patient needs to be integrated into guidelines for treating aged patients. Overall, Australian nurses and pharmacists shared similar perspectives about defining an ‘older’ patient, favouring holistic assessments of individual patients.
Non-prescribing health practitioners, such as nurses and pharmacists, advocate an individualised approach, rather than a number-based approach, to decision making in older patients.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Natalia Krzyżaniak, Shamsher Singh and Beata Bajorek declare there are no conflicts of interest.
None to declare.
- 1.Ageing and health: fact sheet No 404. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs404/en/. Accessed 25 Sept 2016.
- 8.Singh S, Bajorek B. Defining ‘elderly’ in clinical practice guidelines for pharmacotherapy. Pharm Pract. 2014;12(4):489.Google Scholar
- 13.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older people. 2018. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-statistics/population-groups/older-people/overview. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.
- 14.Slack C. Biological vs chronological age: how old are you really? 2016. https://theconversation.com/biological-vs-chronological-age-how-old-are-you-really-66962. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.
- 32.Understanding our health care system. http://healthissuescentre.org.au/consumers/health-care-in-australia/understanding-our-health-care-system. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.
- 33.Population Composition: Regional population ageing. 2006. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/ABS@.nsf/2f762f95845417aeca25706c00834efa/851dece969d9182cca2570ec000a2501!OpenDocument. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
- 35.Data Saturation—numbers left out in the rain, or something else? 2018. http://nsfconsulting.com.au/data-saturation/. Accessed 2 Mar 2018.
- 41.The four main approaches. 2009. http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Research/Understanding-dementia-research/Types-of-research/The-four-main-approaches. Accessed 28 Mar 2017.
- 42.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry, vol. 75. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 1985.Google Scholar
- 44.Health Statistics and Information Systems—Definition of an older or elderly person. 2016. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.
- 49.Mutasingwa DR, Ge H, Upshur REG. How applicable are clinical practice guidelines to elderly patients with comorbidities? Can Fam Phys. 2011;57(7):e253–62.Google Scholar
- 50.Cox L, Kloseck M, Crilly R, McWilliam C, et al. Underrepresentation of individuals 80 years of age and older in chronic disease clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Phys. 2011;57(7):e263–9.Google Scholar
- 56.Ageism: How Healthcare Fails the Elderly. http://www.agingresearch.org/backend/app/webroot/files/Pressroom/51/Ageism_How_Healthcare_Fails_the_Elderly.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2016.
- 57.Ouchida K, Lachs M. Not for doctors only: ageism in healthcare. J Am Soc Ageing. 2015;39(3):46–57.Google Scholar
- 63.Marek K, Antle L. Medication management of the community-dwelling older adult. In: Hughes R, editor. Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2670/.