An Analysis of Real-World Data on the Safety of Etanercept in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
- 145 Downloads
The aim of this study was to use real-world data to evaluate potential interactions between age, treatment, and the risk of developing four adverse events (AEs) common in the elderly: congestive heart failure, serious infections, non-melanoma skin cancer, and interstitial lung disease. These AEs were identified as important in a prior age-based analysis (≤ 65 vs > 65 years) of etanercept- or placebo-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in controlled clinical trials.
Real-world data (1 January 2013 to 31 January 2018) were obtained from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan® Database. Patients were included if aged ≥ 18 years, enrolled for ≥ 1 year prior to RA diagnosis, and without any of the four AEs of interest prior to RA diagnosis or between RA diagnosis and first etanercept exposure. Logistic regression analysis was applied following propensity matching of patients receiving or not receiving etanercept based on age at diagnosis, age status at the beginning of observation (> 65 years or not), sex, geographic region, and follow-up duration.
The overall cohort comprised 403,689 patients. The absolute risk of each of the four AEs increased with age. In propensity-matched cohorts, etanercept was associated with significantly higher odds of developing each of the four AEs (p < 0.001 for all). However, the relative risk of experiencing the four AEs in patients who received etanercept versus those who did not was similar between patients ≤ 65 years of age and those > 65 years of age.
In patients with RA, the relative increase in etanercept-associated risk of experiencing congestive heart failure, serious infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, or interstitial lung disease was similar between elderly and non-elderly.
This study was funded by Pfizer. Medical writing support was provided by David Wateridge, PhD, and Lorna Forse, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions, and was funded by Pfizer.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was sponsored by Pfizer.
Conflict of interest
CJE has received research grants from AbbVie and Pfizer, and consultant fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB. JFB, SB, HEJ, RP, JS and LM are employees of Pfizer, or were employees of Pfizer when this study was conducted, and hold stock or stock options in Pfizer.
As a non-interventional study, ethical approval was not required for this analysis. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Nam JL, Takase-Minegishi K, Ramiro S, Chatzidionysiou K, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, et al. Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Galloway JB, Hyrich KL, Mercer LK, Dixon WG, Fu B, Ustianowski AP, et al. Anti-TNF therapy is associated with an increased risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis especially in the first 6 months of treatment: updated results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register with special emphasis on risks in the elderly. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(1):124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar