Skip to main content
Log in

Severity and Management of Drug–Drug Interactions in Acute Geriatric Patients

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have investigated the prevalence of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) among the elderly in different care settings, but data describing the frequency and management of DDIs among acute geriatric patients appear to be absent.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the severity and interdisciplinary management of DDIs in patients admitted to an acute geriatric ward.

Methods

The study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Norway, over a period of 19 weeks in 2010/11. On admission and daily during the hospital stay, prescribed medications were reviewed by pharmacists to identify DDIs with the aid of web-based databases. DDIs defined to be of potential clinical relevance, i.e., those classified as “major” (generally avoid) or “moderate” (precautions recommended), were following assessments by pharmacists presented at interdisciplinary meetings with geriatricians and nurses, and discussed in relation to the possible implementation of monitoring actions or changes in prescribing. The odds for prescribing changes were compared in relation to DDI type (“pharmacokinetic” vs. “pharmacodynamic”) and severity (“major” vs. “moderate”). The project group retrospectively assessed the possible causal relationships between hospitalizations and DDIs.

Results

The pharmacists identified 245 DDIs of major (n = 13) or moderate (n = 232) severity in 80 (63.5 %) of the 126 patients included on admission and/or during hospitalization. In 94 of 162 cases where the pharmacists alerted the geriatricians (58.0 %), prescribing changes or monitoring actions were implemented. Prescribing changes (n = 38) were performed significantly more often for major than for moderate DDIs [odds ratio (OR) 3.8; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2–12.2, p = 0.03], and significantly more often for pharmacokinetic than for pharmacodynamic DDIs (OR 4.9; 95 % CI 2.2–10.9, p < 0.01). For 28 of 126 patients (22.2 %), a causal relationship between hospitalizations and DDIs was assessed as “possible”.

Conclusions

The present study shows that acute geriatric patients are frequently exposed to DDIs for which active management is recommended in order to avoid unfavorable clinical outcomes. The integration of pharmacists into interdisciplinary teams could prevent potentially severe DDIs in the elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hug BL, Keohane C, Seger DL, Yoon C, Bates DW. The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38(3):120–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piazza G, Nguyen TN, Cios D, Labreche M, Hohlfelder B, Fanikos J, et al. Anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events. Am J Med. 2011;124(12):1136–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seynaeve S, Verbrugghe W, Claes B, Vandenplas D, Reyntiens D, Jorens PG. Adverse drug events in intensive care units: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(6):e131–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rottenkolber D, Schmiedl S, Rottenkolber M, Farker K, Salje K, Mueller S, et al. Adverse drug reactions in Germany: direct costs of internal medicine hospitalizations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(6):626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Vander Vliet MB, Schneider J, Leape L. Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(4):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, Burdick E, Laird N, Petersen LA, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1997;277(4):307–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Olivier P, Bertrand L, Tubery M, Lauque D, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Hospitalizations because of adverse drug reactions in elderly patients admitted through the emergency department: a prospective survey. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(6):475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miranda V, Fede A, Nobuo M, Ayres V, Giglio A, Miranda M, et al. Adverse drug reactions and drug interactions as causes of hospital admission in oncology. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;42(3):342–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18,820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker ML, Kallewaard M, Caspers PW, Visser LE, Leufkens HG, Stricker BH. Hospitalisations and emergency department visits due to drug–drug interactions: a literature review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(6):641–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moura C, Prado N, Acurcio F. Potential drug–drug interactions associated with prolonged stays in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(5):309–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turnheim K. Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational? Drugs Aging. 1998;13(5):357–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hellden A, Bergman U, von Euler M, Hentschke M, Odar-Cederlof I, Ohlen G. Adverse drug reactions and impaired renal function in elderly patients admitted to the emergency department: a retrospective study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(7):595–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi S, Morike K, Klotz U. The clinical implications of ageing for rational drug therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64(2):183–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cannon KT, Choi MM, Zuniga MA. Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients receiving home health care: a retrospective data analysis. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006;4(2):134–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosia-Randell HM, Muurinen SM, Pitkala KH. Exposure to potentially inappropriate drugs and drug–drug interactions in elderly nursing home residents in Helsinki, Finland: a cross-sectional study. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(8):683–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tulner LR, Frankfort SV, Gijsen GJ, van Campen JP, Koks CH, Beijnen JH. Drug–drug interactions in a geriatric outpatient cohort: prevalence and relevance. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(4):343–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Secoli SR, Figueras A, Lebrao ML, de Lima FD, Santos JL. Risk of potential drug–drug interactions among Brazilian elderly: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27(9):759–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zakrzewski-Jakubiak H, Doan J, Lamoureux P, Singh D, Turgeon J, Tannenbaum C. Detection and prevention of drug–drug interactions in the hospitalized elderly: utility of new cytochrome p450-based software. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9(6):461–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Doucet J, Chassagne P, Trivalle C, Landrin I, Pauty MD, Kadri N, et al. Drug–drug interactions related to hospital admissions in older adults: a prospective study of 1000 patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44(8):944–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blix HS, Viktil KK, Moger TA, Reikvam A. Identification of drug interactions in hospitals—computerized screening vs. bedside recording. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;33(2):131–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krahenbuhl S, Beer JH. Prevalence of drug–drug interactions at hospital entry and during hospital stay of patients in internal medicine. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(6):413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gillespie U, Alassaad A, Henrohn D, Garmo H, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Toss H, et al. A comprehensive pharmacist intervention to reduce morbidity in patients 80 years or older: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(9):894–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors have received no funding for this study. Dr. Torgeir Bruun Wyller has received payments for lectures on pharmacotherapy in the elderly from Roche, Nycomed, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. The authors thank the physicians and nurses at the acute geriatric ward for their positive contribution to the study, and Professor Anne Gerd Granås for valuable input during revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Espen Molden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lea, M., Rognan, S.E., Koristovic, R. et al. Severity and Management of Drug–Drug Interactions in Acute Geriatric Patients. Drugs Aging 30, 721–727 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0091-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0091-y

Keywords

Navigation