Drug Resistance During HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Clinical studies have demonstrated that use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with or without emtricitabine as antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can decrease the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition when medication adherence is high. However, the potential for PrEP to promote antiretroviral resistance remains an important public health consideration. We performed a search of the medical literature to identify studies that address HIV drug resistance during PrEP use. In this review, we summarize findings about emergent drug resistance during clinical trials of PrEP, case reports of seroconversions in patients adherent to PrEP, and animal studies of PrEP effectiveness against drug-resistant viral strains. We also discuss the potential utility of novel PrEP formulations for protection against drug-resistant HIV, the impact of drug resistance on HIV treatment options, and mathematical models that estimate the potential contribution of PrEP to population-level drug resistance. Evidence suggests that selection for HIV drug resistance with PrEP use is infrequent and most likely to occur when PrEP is used during undiagnosed acute HIV infection. Breakthrough infections during PrEP use with high adherence are possible, but appear to be rare. The prevalence of drug-resistant HIV strains needs to be monitored as PrEP is scaled up. However, the benefit of a decreased HIV incidence with wider PrEP use is likely to outweigh the risk of harms from possible increases in the prevalence of HIV drug resistance.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article was made possible with help from the Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), a National Institutes of Health-funded program (P30 AI060354).
Conflict of interest
Douglas S. Krakower has conducted studies funded by research grants to his institution from Gilead Sciences and has been compensated to author or present continuing medical education materials for Medscape, MED-IQ, DKBmed, and UptoDate, Inc. Kevin M. Gibas, Polly van den Berg, and Victoria E. Powell have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
- 1.UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics: 2018 fact sheet. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the United States: at a glance. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
- 5.Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Mock PA, Leethochawalit M, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2083–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lehman DA, Baeten JM, McCoy CO, Weis JF, Peterson D, Mbara G, et al. Risk of drug resistance among persons acquiring HIV within a randomized clinical trial of single-or dual-agent preexposure prophylaxis. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(8):1211–8.Google Scholar
- 10.Baeten JM, Donnell D, Mugo NR, Ndase P, Thomas KK, Campbell JD, et al. Single-agent tenofovir versus combination emtricitabine plus tenofovir for pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 acquisition: an update of data from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(11):1055–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Delaugerre C, Rodriguez C, Capitant C, Nere M-L, Mercier-Darty M, Carette D, et al. Drug resistance among patients who acquired HIV infection in a preexposure prophylaxis trial. AIDS. 2018;32(16):2353–61.Google Scholar
- 24.Kibengo FM, Ruzagira E, Katende D, Bwanika AN, Bahemuka U, Haberer JE, et al. Safety, adherence and acceptability of intermittent tenofovir/emtricitabine as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV-uninfected Ugandan volunteers living in HIV-serodiscordant relationships: a randomized, clinical trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Cong M-E, Mitchell J, Sweeney E, Bachman S, Hanson DL, Heneine W, et al. Prophylactic efficacy of oral emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combination therapy against a tenofovir-resistant simian/human immunodeficiency virus containing the K65R mutation in macaques. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(3):463–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Hoornenborg E, Prins M, Achterbergh RC, Woittiez LR, Cornelissen M, Jurriaans S, et al. Acquisition of wild-type HIV-1 infection in a patient on pre-exposure prophylaxis with high intracellular concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate: a case report. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(11):e522–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Parikh U. Sensitive next-generation sequencing of HIV-1 from seroconverters in the MTN-020/ASPIRE Dapivirine Vaginal Ring Study. HIV Research for Prevention (HIVR4P) Conference; 21–25 Oct 2018; Madrid.Google Scholar
- 48.ClinicalTrials.gov. HPTN 083: a phase 2b/3 double blind safety and efficacy study of injectable cabotegravir compared to daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), for pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV-uninfected cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720094. Accessed 01 Mar 2019.