, Volume 78, Issue 7, pp 773–780 | Cite as

Latanoprostene Bunod Ophthalmic Solution 0.024%: A Review in Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Adis Drug Evaluation


Latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% (hereafter referred to as latanoprostene bunod 0.024%) [Vyzulta™] is a nitric oxide (NO)-donating prostaglandin F analogue approved in the USA for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. It is thought to lower IOP by increasing aqueous humour outflow through the uveoscleral pathway (mediated by latanoprost acid) and increasing the facility of aqueous humour outflow through the trabecular meshwork pathway (mediated by NO). Results from two multinational, phase III studies (APOLLO and LUNAR) and a pooled analysis of these studies demonstrated the noninferiority of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% to timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% (hereafter referred to as timolol 0.5%) in terms of IOP-lowering efficacy over 3 months in patients with OAG or ocular hypertension, with the superiority of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% over timolol 0.5% subsequently demonstrated in APOLLO and the pooled analysis. Moreover, there was no apparent loss of IOP-lowering effect in subsequent safety extension periods of up to 9 months. The IOP-lowering efficacy seen in APOLLO and LUNAR was confirmed in a phase III study (JUPITER) in Japanese patients, with IOP reductions observed early (week 4) and maintained over the longer-term (12 months). Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% was well tolerated over up to 12 months in these studies, with most ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) being mild to moderate in severity. Thus, current evidence indicates once-daily latanoprostene bunod 0.024% is an effective and well tolerated treatment option for the reduction of IOP in adults with OAG or ocular hypertension.



During the peer review process, the manufacturer of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% was also offered an opportunity to review this article. Changes resulting from comments received were made on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding.

Conflict of interest

Sheridan Hoy is a salaried employee of Adis/Springer, is responsible for the article content and declares no relevant conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Liebmann JM, Lee JK. Current therapeutic options and treatments in development for the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23(15 Suppl):S279–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abu-Hassan DW, Acott TS, Kelley MJ. The trabecular meshwork: a basic review of form and function. J Ocul Biol. 2014;2(1). http://fulltextarticles.avensonline.org/JOCB-2334-838-02-0017.html.
  3. 3.
    Aptel F, Chiquet C, Romanet J-P. Intraocular pressure-lowering combination therapies with prostaglandin analogues. Drugs. 2012;72(10):1355–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holló G, Katsanos A, Boboridis KG, et al. Preservative-free prostaglandin analogs and prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations in the treatment of glaucoma: efficacy, safety and potential advantages. Drugs. 2018;78(1):39–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu LJ, Tsai JC, Liu J. Novel pharmacologic candidates for treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Yale J Biol Med. 2017;90(1):111–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavet ME, Vittitow JL, Impagnatiello F, et al. Nitric oxide (NO): an emerging target for the treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(8):5005–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavet ME, DeCory HH. The role of nitric oxide in the intraocular pressure lowering efficacy of latanoprostene bunod: review of nonclinical studies. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018;34(1–2):52–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cavet ME, Vollmer TR, Harrington KL, et al. Regulation of endothelin-1-induced trabecular meshwork cell contractility by latanoprostene bunod. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):4108–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saeki T, Tsuruga H, Aihara M, et al. Dose-response profile of PF-03187207 (PF-207) and peak IOP lowering response following single topical administration to FP receptor knockout mice vs. wild type mice [abstract no. 4064]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(13).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krauss AH, Impagnatiello F, Toris CB, et al. Ocular hypotensive activity of BOL-303259-X, a nitric oxide donating prostaglandin F2α agonist, in preclinical models. Exp Eye Res. 2011;93(3):250–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bausch & Lomb Inc. VYZULTA (latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution) 0.024%, for topical ophthalmic use: US prescribing information. 2017. http://www.fda.gov/. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
  12. 12.
    Weinreb RN, Scassellati Sforzolini B, Vittitow J, et al. Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% versus timolol maleate 0.5% in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the APOLLO study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):965–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Medeiros FA, Martin KR, Peace J, et al. Comparison of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% and timolol maleate 0.5% in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the LUNAR study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:250–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawase K, Vittitow JL, Weinreb RN, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% in Japanese subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the JUPITER study. Adv Ther. 2016;33(9):1612–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinreb RN, Ong T, Scassellati Sforzolini B, et al. A randomised, controlled comparison of latanoprostene bunod and latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: the VOYAGER study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(6):738–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu JH, Slight JR, Vittitow JL, et al. Efficacy of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% compared with timolol 0.5% in lowering intraocular pressure over 24 hours. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:249–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weinreb RN, Liebmann JM, Martin KR, et al. Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: pooled phase 3 study findings. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(1):7–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufman PL. Latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% for IOP lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18(4):433–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prum BE Jr, Rosenberg LF, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P41–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fingeret M, Powell M, Vittitow J. Efficacy of latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% in eyes with normal intraocular pressures [abstract]. In: American Academy of Optometry 95th Annual Meeting. 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SpringerAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations