Advertisement

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 56, Issue 8, pp 941–951 | Cite as

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exploratory Pharmacodynamics of Lorazepam in Pediatric Status Epilepticus

  • Daniel Gonzalez
  • James M. Chamberlain
  • Jeffrey T. Guptill
  • Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
  • Barrie Harper
  • Jian Zhao
  • Edmund V. CapparelliEmail author
  • On behalf of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Lorazepam is one of the preferred agents used for intravenous treatment of status epilepticus (SE). We combined data from two pediatric clinical trials to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of intravenous lorazepam in infants and children aged 3 months to 17 years with active SE or a history of SE.

Methods

We developed a population pharmacokinetic model for lorazepam using the NONMEM software. We then assessed exploratory exposure–response relationships using the overall efficacy and safety study endpoints, and performed dosing simulations.

Results

A total of 145 patients contributed 439 pharmacokinetic samples. The median (range) age and dose were 5.4 years (0.3–17.8) and 0.10 mg/kg (0.02–0.18), respectively. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with allometric scaling described the data well. In addition to total body weight (WT), younger age was associated with slightly higher weight-normalized clearance (CL). The following relationships characterized the typical values for the central compartment volume (V1), CL, peripheral compartment volume (V2), and intercompartmental CL (Q), using individual subject WT (kg) and age (years): V1 (L) = 0.879*WT; CL (L/h) = 0.115*(Age/4.7)0.133*WT0.75; V2 (L) = 0.542*V1; Q (L/h) = 1.45*WT0.75. No pharmacokinetic parameters were associated with clinical outcomes. Simulations suggest uniform pediatric dosing (0.1 mg/kg, to a maximum of 4 mg) can be used to achieve concentrations of 50–100 ng/mL in children with SE, which have been previously associated with effective seizure control.

Conclusions

The population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam were successfully described using a sparse sampling approach and a two-compartment model in pediatric patients with active SE.

Keywords

Status Epilepticus Population Pharmacokinetic Model Virtual Patient Visual Predictive Check Lorazepam Dose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The assay measuring lorazepam concentrations was performed at by Christine Grosse, Kenneth Lewis, and Robert Wurm at OpAns Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA.

The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee

Daniel K. Benjamin Jr, MD, PhD, Katherine Y. Berezny, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; Gregory L. Kearns, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR; Matthew M. Laughon, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Ian M. Paul, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA; Michael J. Smith, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; P. Brian Smith, MD, MPH, MHS, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; John van den Anker, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health, Washington, DC; Kelly Wade, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: David Siegel, Perdita Taylor-Zapata, Anne Zajicek, Zhaoxia Ren, Ekaterini Tsilou, Alice Pagan.

The EMMES Corporation (Data Coordinating Center): Ravinder Anand, Traci Clemons, Gina Simone.

Pediatric Trials Network Lorazepam Study Team, Principal Investigators, and Study Coordinators

Duke Clinical Research Institute: Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, Kevin Watt, Jeffrey T. Guptill, and Barrie Harper

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Daniel Gonzalez

University of California, San Diego: Edmund V. Capparelli

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This work was funded under National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) contract HHSN275201000003I (principal investigator: Benjamin) for the Pediatric Trials Network. Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number UL1TR001117.

Conflict of interest

Daniel Gonzalez receives research support from the NICHD (K23HD083465), the non-profit organization Thrasher Research Fund (http://www.thrasherresearch.org), and from industry (Cempra, Inc. and Jacobus Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.) for drug development in adults and children. Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez receives research support from the NIH (1R01-HD076676-01A1), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (UL1TR001117), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID; HHSN272201500006I and HHSN272201300017I), NICHD (HHSN275201000003I), FDA (1U01FD004858-01), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA; HHSO100201300009C), and the non-profit organization Thrasher Research Fund (http://www.thrasherresearch.org) for drug development in adults and children (http://www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp). Jeffrey T. Guptill receives research support through K23NS085049 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). James M. Chamberlain, Barrie Harper, Jian Zhao, and Edmund V. Capparelli have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Ethical Approval

Both pediatric studies were reviewed and approved by local Institutional Review Boards.

Informed Consent

For the Status 1 study, patients either pre-consented to participate in the study prior to the presentation of SE or consented to participate in the study after they received lorazepam if they presented to the Emergency Department with SE. For the Status 2 study, participating hospitals submitted a site-specific plan to their Institutional Review Board regarding the specific activities to address the requirements for the Exception from Informed Consent for Emergency Research (21 CFR 50.24). Thus, patients were treated prior to consent and then once their condition had stabilized the family was approached to discuss the study and obtain written consent for continued study participation.

Supplementary material

40262_2016_486_MOESM1_ESM.docx (965 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 966 kb)Please use the ESM file that has been sent to you via email (contains the journal name, title, author names and corresponding author affiliation and email address)

References

  1. 1.
    Dham BS, Hunter K, Rincon F. The epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:476–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chin RFM, Neville BGR, Peckham C, Bedford H, Wade A, Scott RC. Incidence, cause, and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:222–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Betjemann JP, Lowenstein DH. Status epilepticus in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:615–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh R, Gaillard W. Status epilepticus in children. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009;9:137–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glauser T, Shinnar S, Gloss D, Alldredge B, Arya R, Bainbridge J, et al. Evidence-based guideline: treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children and adults: report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsy Curr. 2016;16:48–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, Alldredge B, Bleck TP, Glauser T, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:3–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chamberlain JM, Okada P, Holsti M, Mahajan P, Brown KM, Vance C, et al. Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1652–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI, Franke K, MacLaughlin DS, Harmatz JS, Allen MD, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of intravenous, intramuscular, and oral lorazepam in humans. J Pharm Sci. 1979;68:57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watson Laboratories, Inc. Lorazepam injection package insert. Available at: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=ae274b1f-27c3-483b-99f1-9a9249dc2459. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.
  10. 10.
    Uchaipichat V, Suthisisang C, Miners JO. The glucuronidation of R- and S-lorazepam: Human liver microsomal kinetics, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme selectivity, and inhibition by drugs. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41:1273–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McDermott C, Kowalczyk A, Schnitzler E, Mangurten H, Rodvold K, Metrick S. Pharmacokinetics of lorazepam in critically ill neonates with seizures. J Pediatr. 1992;120:479–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crom WR, Relling MV, Christensen ML, Rivera GK, Evans WE. Age-related differences in hepatic drug clearance in children: studies with lorazepam and antipyrine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991;50:132–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chamberlain JM, Capparelli EV, Brown KM, Vance CW, Lillis K, Mahajan P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous lorazepam in pediatric patients with and without status epilepticus. J Pediatr. 2012;160(667–72):e2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Multicompartment models. In: Gibaldi M, Perrier D, editors. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barr J, Zomorodi K, Bertaccini EJ, Shafer SL, Geller E. A double-blind, randomized comparison of i.v. lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation of ICU patients via a pharmacologic model. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:286–98.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walker JE, Homan RW, Crawford IL. Lorazepam: a controlled trial in patients with intractable partial complex seizures. Epilepsia. 1984;25:464–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Relling MV, Mulhern RK, Dodge RK, Johnson D, Pieper JA, Rivera GK, et al. Lorazepam pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in children. J Pediatr. 1989;114:641–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swart EL, Zuideveld KP, De Jongh J, Danhof M, Thijs LG, Strack van Schijndel RMJ. Comparative population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam during long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;57:135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strassburg CP, Strassburg A, Kneip S, Barut A, Tukey RH, Rodeck B, et al. Developmental aspects of human hepatic drug glucuronidation in young children and adults. Gut. 2002;50:259–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Divakaran K, Hines RN, McCarver DG. Human hepatic UGT2B15 developmental expression. Toxicol Sci. 2014;141:292–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bouwmeester NJ. Developmental pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites in neonates, infants and young children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:208–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muchohi SN, Kokwaro GO, Ogutu BR, Edwards G, Ward SA, Newton CRJC. Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of lorazepam in children with severe malaria and convulsions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65:12–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Gonzalez
    • 1
  • James M. Chamberlain
    • 2
  • Jeffrey T. Guptill
    • 3
    • 4
  • Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
    • 3
    • 4
  • Barrie Harper
    • 3
  • Jian Zhao
    • 5
  • Edmund V. Capparelli
    • 6
    Email author
  • On behalf of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act – Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
  1. 1.Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of PharmacyThe University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Division of Emergency MedicineChildren’s National Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Duke Clinical Research InstituteDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Department of PediatricsDuke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Emmes CorporationRockvilleUSA
  6. 6.Department of Pediatrics and Skaggs School of PharmacyUniversity of CaliforniaLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations