Advertisement

Clinical Drug Investigation

, Volume 39, Issue 11, pp 1117–1123 | Cite as

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Aprocitentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, in Subjects with Severe Renal Function Impairment

  • Patricia N. SidhartaEmail author
  • Ivan Ulč
  • Jasper Dingemanse
Original Research Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan targets a novel pathway in the treatment of hypertension and could be a key player in the treatment of salt/volume-dependent hypertension. Its pharmacokinetic profile supports a once-daily dosing strategy.

Objective

As hypertensive patients may also experience concomitant renal disease, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of aprocitentan in subjects with severe renal function impairment (SRFI) and compare these with matched healthy subjects.

Design, setting, participants

In this open-label, single-center, phase 1 study (NCT03165071) eight subjects with SRFI (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 21.9 mL/min/1.73 m2) and eight healthy subjects (mean eGFR 94.9 mL/min/1.73 m2) received a single dose of 50 mg of aprocitentan followed by an observation period of up to 17 days. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of aprocitentan were derived by noncompartmental analysis of the plasma concentration-time profiles. Differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were explored using geometric means ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) with SRFI subjects as test group and healthy subjects as reference group. Safety and tolerability evaluations included adverse events (AEs), electrocardiograms, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests.

Results

All 16 subjects received aprocitentan and completed the study. The pharmacokinetics of aprocitentan were similar in SRFI and healthy subjects with maximum plasma concentrations reached at 7.6 h and 5.0 h, respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations did not differ as indicated by a GMR (90% CI) of 1.04 (0.85–1.28). Due to a slightly lower observed clearance in SRFI subjects, half-life was longer (53.2 h compared to 47.4 h in healthy subjects), while exposure expressed as area under the curve was 34% higher (GMR 90% CI 1.13–1.58). There were no differences in plasma protein binding (> 99% bound). Aprocitentan was well tolerated in subjects with SRFI with no notable difference compared to healthy subjects.

Conclusions

Based on these single-dose results, subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal function can be included in clinical studies without the need for dose adjustment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted by CEPHA s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval

The study (NCT03165071) followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice, and the protocol and its amendment were approved by an Independent Ethics Committee (Etická komise CEPHA s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic) as well as by the National Health Authority of the Czech Republic. The study was conducted at CEPHA s.r.o, Pilsen, Czech Republic. All subjects provided written informed consent prior to screening.

Conflict of interest

JD is a fellow of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology. PNS and JD are current employees of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd and former employees of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. IU was the principal investigator of the study that was sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Funding

The study was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.

References

  1. 1.
    Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332(6163):411–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dhaun N, Webb DJ. Endothelins in cardiovascular biology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(8):491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haynes WG, Webb DJ. Contribution of endogenous generation of endothelin-1 to basal vascular tone. Lancet. 1994;344(8926):852–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davenport AP, O’Reilly G, Kuc RE. Endothelin ETA and ETB mRNA and receptors expressed by smooth muscle in the human vasculature: majority of the ETA sub-type. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;114(6):1110–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, Kahan T, Mahfoud F, Redon J, Ruilope L, Zanchetti A, Kerins M, Kjeldsen SE, Kreutz R, Laurent S, Lip GYH, McManus R, Narkiewicz K, Ruschitzka F, Schmieder RE, Shlyakhto E, Tsioufis C, Aboyans V, Desormais I, Group ESCSD. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA Sr, Williamson JD, Wright JT Jr. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saito Y, Nakao K, Mukoyama M, Imura H. Increased plasma endothelin level in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(3):205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davenport AP, Hyndman KA, Dhaun N, Southan C, Kohan DE, Pollock JS, Pollock DM, Webb DJ, Maguire JJ. Endothelin. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(2):357–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elijovich F, Laffer CL. Participation of renal and circulating endothelin in salt-sensitive essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(7):459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boesen EI. Endothelin receptors, renal effects and blood pressure. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;21:25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaddam KK, Nishizaka MK, Pratt-Ubunama MN, Pimenta E, Aban I, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. Characterization of resistant hypertension: association between resistant hypertension, aldosterone, and persistent intravascular volume expansion. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(11):1159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taler SJ. Treatment of resistant hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2005;7(5):323–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schiffrin EL. Endothelin: role in hypertension. Biol Res. 1998;31(3):199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trensz F, Bortolamiol C, Kramberg M, Wanner D, Hadana H, Rey M, Strasser DS, Delahaye S, Hess P, Vezzali E, Mentzel U, Menard J, Clozel M, Iglarz M. Pharmacological characterization of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, alone and in combination with blockers of the renin angiotensin system, in two models of experimental hypertension. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019;368(3):462–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sidharta PN, Melchior M, Kankam MK, Dingemanse J. Single- and multiple-dose tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in healthy adult and elderly subjects. Drug Design Dev Ther. 2019;13:949–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    EMA (2015) European Medicines Agency (EMA)—Committee for Medicinal Products for Human use (CHMP): guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function (EMA/CHMP/83874/2014). London, UK. 1 July, 2016. In: ed.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    FDA (2010) U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER): guidance for industry: pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function—study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. Silver Spring, MD, USA. March 2010, revision 1. In: ed.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dingemanse J, Sidharta PN, Maddrey WC, Rubin LJ, Mickail H. Efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in comparison to other endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(3):391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Summary of Product Characteristics: Opsumit® (macitentan) 10 mg tablets, for oral use. Actelion Registration, Ltd. revised 23 August 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia N. Sidharta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ivan Ulč
    • 2
  • Jasper Dingemanse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PharmacologyIdorsia Pharmaceuticals LtdAllschwilSwitzerland
  2. 2.CEPHA s.r.oPilsenCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations