A Practical Approach for Calculating Reliable Cost Estimates from Observational Data: Application to Cost Analyses in Maternal and Child Health
- 217 Downloads
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) and cost-effectiveness analysis are valuable tools for informing health policy and clinical care decisions. Despite the increased availability of rich observational databases with economic measures, few researchers have the skills needed to conduct valid and reliable cost analyses for CER.
The objectives of this paper are to (i) describe a practical approach for calculating cost estimates from hospital charges in discharge data using publicly available hospital cost reports, and (ii) assess the impact of using different methods for cost estimation in maternal and child health (MCH) studies by conducting economic analyses on gestational diabetes (GDM) and pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity.
In Florida, we have constructed a clinically enhanced, longitudinal, encounter-level MCH database covering over 2.3 million infants (and their mothers) born alive from 1998 to 2009. Using this as a template, we describe a detailed methodology to use publicly available data to calculate hospital-wide and department-specific cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs), link them to the master database, and convert reported hospital charges to refined cost estimates. We then conduct an economic analysis as a case study on women by GDM and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) status to compare the impact of using different methods on cost estimation.
Over 60 % of inpatient charges for birth hospitalizations came from the nursery/labor/delivery units, which have very different cost-to-charge markups (CCR = 0.70) than the commonly substituted hospital average (CCR = 0.29). Using estimated mean, per-person maternal hospitalization costs for women with GDM as an example, unadjusted charges ($US14,696) grossly overestimated actual cost, compared with hospital-wide ($US3,498) and department-level ($US4,986) CCR adjustments. However, the refined cost estimation method, although more accurate, did not alter our conclusions that infant/maternal hospitalization costs were significantly higher for women with GDM than without, and for overweight/obese women than for those in a normal BMI range.
Cost estimates, particularly among MCH-related services, vary considerably depending on the adjustment method. Our refined approach will be valuable to researchers interested in incorporating more valid estimates of cost into databases with linked hospital discharge files.
KeywordsBirth Certificate Hospital Charge Comparative Effectiveness Research Hospital Discharge Data Hospital Discharge Record
The authors acknowledge the following organizations and individuals for contributing to this project: the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for promoting the enhancement of statewide, hospital-based, encounter-level databases (Grant Number R01HS019997); Social and Scientific Systems, Inc. for their coordination and direction of enhanced state data grants; and the staff of the Florida Department of Health and the Agency for Health Care Administration for providing access to the hospital discharge and vital statistics data used in this project.
This project was supported by grant number R01HS019997 from the AHRQ. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the AHRQ, or the University of South Florida. The authors do not have any relevant financial interest in this manuscript.
The introduction was written by JLS, MMC, and KC. The methodology for the project was written by JLS, MMC, and HMS. The results section, tables, and figures were prepared by JLS and MFM. The discussion section was written by JLS and HMS with support from the other authors. All authors contributed to the conceptualization and planning of the work that led to this manuscript.
- 2.Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2009.Google Scholar
- 3.Gluck ME. Research insights: incorporating costs into comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: Academy Health. 2009. http://www.academyhealth.org/files/publications/ResearchInsightsCER. Accessed 7 Jan 2013.
- 8.Data Innovations. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD; 2012. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/grants.jsp. Accessed 13 Nov 2012.
- 11.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. DRG summary for Medicare inpatient prospective payment hospitals, FY2011. 2013. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/index.html. Accessed 10 May 2013.
- 12.Song X, Friedman B. Calculate cost adjustment factors by APR-DRG and CCS using selected states with detailed charges. In: HCUP Methods Series Report #2008-04. Online October 8, 2008. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods.jsp.
- 16.Elixhauser A, Wier LM. Complicating conditions of pregnancy and childbirth, 2008: statistical brief #113. 2006. [bookaccession].Google Scholar
- 20.Podulka J, Stranges E, Steiner C. Hospitalizations related to childbirth, 2008. In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Healthcare Cost Utilization Project. 2011. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb110.jsp.
- 28.Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Bailey M, Mbah AK, Salihu HM. Creation and evaluation of a multi-layered maternal and child health database for comparative effectiveness research. J registry manag. 2013;40(1):14-28.Google Scholar
- 29.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Cost reports: general information. 2013. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Files-for-Order/CostReports/index.html. Accessed 9 Jan 2013.
- 30.The National Bureau of Economic Research. HCRIS cost center coded worksheets. http://www.nber.org/hcris/CSTCODES.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2012.
- 31.Sun Y, Friedman B. Tools for more accurate inpatient cost estimates with HCUP databases, 2009. In: HCUP Methods Series Report # 2011-04. Online October 17, 2011. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2011. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods.jsp.
- 32.Friedman B, De La Mare J, Andrews R, McKenzie DH. Practical options for estimating cost of hospital inpatient stays. J Health Care Financ. 2002;29(1):1–13.Google Scholar
- 33.United States Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer price index: all urban consumers (CPI-U). 2012. ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt. Accessed 16 Nov 2012.
- 34.National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report (no. 98-4083) Washington (DC). 1998.Google Scholar
- 35.Leslie S, Thiebaud P. Using propensity scores to adjust for treatment selection bias. SAS Global Forum. 2007.Google Scholar
- 38.Muennig P. Cost-effectiveness analysis in health: a practical approach. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.Google Scholar
- 40.Johnsson J. Conflicting hospital performance data: who’s right? Hospitals. 1991;65(2):30, 2, 4.Google Scholar
- 41.Lutz S. Sorting out the differences in hospitals’ profit figures. Mod Healthc. 1993;23(43):60, 62.Google Scholar
- 42.Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, Weinstein M, editors. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
- 43.Rogowski J, Harrison ES. Treatment costs for very low birthweight infants. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; MR-451-AHCPR. 1995.Google Scholar