Advertisement

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 681–685 | Cite as

Increasing Frequency of Seborrheic Keratosis Diagnoses as a Favorable Consequence of Teledermatology-Based Skin Cancer Screening: A Cross-sectional Study of 34,553 Patients

  • David Moreno-RamírezEmail author
  • Jesús Raya-Maldonado
  • Macarena Morales-Conde
  • Teresa Ojeda-Vila
  • Francisco J. Martín-Gutiérrez
  • Andrés Ruíz-de-Casas
  • Almudena Fernández-Orland
  • Herrerías-Esteban JM
  • Lara Ferrándiz
short communication

Abstract

Background

Screening of skin cancer by teledermatology (TD) has improved the early detection of skin cancer by enhancing access to skin cancer clinics.

Objective

We sought to analyze how TD-based skin cancer screening has changed the frequency of consultations for benign lesions.

Patients and methods

A cross-sectional study including teleconsultations received during a 7-year period was conducted to analyze and compare the trendlines of each lesion type over the study period. Trendlines were analyzed using a linear regression model with the R-squared (R 2) test for goodness of fit.

Results

A total of 34,553 teleconsultations were included in the study. Seborrheic keratoses, followed by benign melanocytic lesions, were the most frequent lesions diagnosed. The pick-up rate for malignant lesions was 1:8.6 teleconsultations. Seborrheic keratoses and precancerous lesions showed a positive trendline with good fit to the linear model (R 2 = 0.8 and R 2 = 0.8, respectively). Tis-T1 malignant melanoma (in situ melanoma or melanoma with a Breslow thickness <1 mm) showed an increasing trendline with moderate-to-low fit to the model (R 2 = 0.4).

Conclusions

TD-based screening of skin cancer is associated with an increasing rate of consultations involving seborrheic keratoses, which can be considered a consequence of improved access to dermatologists resulting from TD implementation.

Keywords

Malignant Melanoma Skin Cancer Malignant Lesion Precancerous Lesion Actinic Keratosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The local institutional review board has reviewed and approved this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study has been partially funded by a competitive grant obtained from the Health Council of the Regional Government of Andalusia, Spain (PI0276-2013).

References

  1. 1.
    Moreno-Ramírez D, Ferrándiz L. A 10-year history of teledermatology for skin cancer management. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1289–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrándiz L, Ruiz-de-Casas A, Martín-Gutiérrez FM, Peral-Rubio F, Méndez-Abda C, Ríos-Martín JJ, Moreno-Ramírez D. Effect of teledermatology on the prognosis of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148:1025–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kahn E, Sossong S, Goh A, Carpenter D, Goldstein S. Evaluation of skin cancer in Northern California Kaiser Permanente´s store-and-forward Teledermatology referral program. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19:780–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warshaw EM, Gravely AA, Nelson DB. Reliability of store and forward Teledermatology for skin neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:426–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansen C, Wilkinson D, Hansen M, Argenziano G. How good are skin cancer clinics at melanoma detection? Number needed to treat variability across a national clinic group in Australia. J Am AcadDermatol. 2009;61:599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castillo-Arenas E, Garrido V, Serrano-Ortega S. Skin conditions in primary care: an analysis of referral demand. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:271–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ford JA, Pereira A. Does teledermatology reduces secondary care referrals and is it acceptable to patients and doctors? A service evaluation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:710–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salerni G, Alonso C, Gorosito M, Ferández-Bussy R. Seborrheic keratosis-like melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(Suppl):S53–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyd AS, Su PF, Shyr Y, Tang YW. Squamous cell carcinomas in situ arising in seborrheic keratosis: an association with concomitant immunosuppression? Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:1346–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marks R, Jolley D, McCormack, Dorevitch AP. Who removes pigmented skin lesions? J Am AcadDermatol. 1997;36:721–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    English DR, del Mar C, Burton RC. Factors influencing the number needed to excise: excision rates of pigmented lesions by general practitioners. Med J Aust. 2004;180:16–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahnlide I, Nielsen K, Bjellerup M. Diagnosis of pigmented skin tumours in a dermatological setting: different aspects of the number needed to excise as a measure of efficiency. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94:683–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moreno-Ramírez D, Ojeda-Vila T, Ríos-Martín JJ, Ruiz-Villaverde R, de-Troya M, Sanz-Trelles A, Ferrándiz L, et al. The role of accessibility policies and other determinants of health care provision in the initial prognosis of malignant melanoma: a cross-sectional study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:507–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Moreno-Ramírez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jesús Raya-Maldonado
    • 1
  • Macarena Morales-Conde
    • 1
  • Teresa Ojeda-Vila
    • 1
  • Francisco J. Martín-Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • Andrés Ruíz-de-Casas
    • 1
  • Almudena Fernández-Orland
    • 1
  • Herrerías-Esteban JM
    • 2
  • Lara Ferrándiz
    • 1
  1. 1.Chief of the Medical and Surgical Dermatology Unit, HUVM Teledermatology NetworkHospital Universitario Virgen MacarenaSevilleSpain
  2. 2.ICT DepartmentHospital Universitario Virgen MacarenaSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations