Advertisement

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 65–74 | Cite as

Statin Use and Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Ashley I. Martinez
  • Patricia R. Freeman
  • Daniela C. MogaEmail author
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Nearly 70% of Americans with cardiovascular disease use statins, which have documented bleeding effects independent of their cholesterol-lowering activities. However, the literature is conflicting regarding the association between statin use and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in statin users.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, data from the Truven Health MarketScan® Research Database (2009–2015) were used to investigate the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage amongst statin users aged 30–65 years at the initial prescription claim. Statin users and a group of negative controls (i.e. other chronic medication users) were followed until first gastrointestinal hemorrhage event (both inpatient and outpatient, as well as restricted to inpatient), and were censored at treatment discontinuation, disenrollment from coverage, or the end of the study period.

Results

Statin users had an elevated risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which was especially apparent in the first year of treatment (1-year adjusted hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.23). The risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage leading to hospitalization was even higher (1-year adjusted hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI 1.30–1.69). High-intensity statin users had a greater rate of gastrointestinal hemorrhage than moderate-intensity users (incidence rates per 1000 subject-years 22.2 (95% CI 21.9–22.8) vs. 21.5 (95% CI 21.3–21.8), respectively).

Conclusions

In a population of commercially insured subjects aged 30–65 years, statin users had a higher risk for gastrointestinal hemorrhage than other chronic medication users. These findings are important when treating patients at a high risk for bleeding events.

Notes

Acknowledgements

A similar version of this work (using propensity score matching technique) was presented at the American Pharmacists Association Annual Meeting and Exposition in March 2016 as well as at the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology Midyear Meeting in Toronto, Ontario in 2018. The abstract for the poster presented in Baltimore was published in the Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 56(3):e121.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Ashley I. Martinez, Patricia R. Freeman, and Daniela C. Moga declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Supplementary material

40256_2018_301_MOESM1_ESM.docx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gu Q, Paulose-Ram R, Burt V, et al. Prescription cholesterol-lowering medication use in adults aged 40 and over: United States, 2003–2012 [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Health Statistics; 2014. Report No.: 177. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db177.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2017.
  2. 2.
    Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals. Lipitor (atorvastatin calcium) [Internet]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2009. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020702s057lbl.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2017.
  3. 3.
    Miserez AR, Rossi FA, Keller U. Prediction of the therapeutic response to simvastatin by pretreatment lipid concentrations in 2082 subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;46:107–14.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nikolsky E, Sadeghi HM, Effron MB, et al. Impact of in-hospital acquired thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atar S, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Statins are associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: analysis of the Orbofiban in Patients with Unstable coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 16 (OPUS-TIMI 16) trial. Am. Heart J. 2006;151:976.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douketis JD, Melo M, Bell CM, et al. Does statin therapy decrease the risk for bleeding in patients who are receiving warfarin? Am J Med. 2007;120:369.e9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huisa BN, Stemer AB, Zivin JA. Atorvastatin in stroke: a review of SPARCL and subgroup analysis. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:229.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schelleman H, Bilker WB, Brensinger CM, et al. Fibrate/statin initiation in warfarin users and gastrointestinal bleeding risk. Am J Med. 2010;123:151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woo D, Deka R, Falcone GJ, et al. Apolipoprotein E, statins, and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2013;44:3013–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falcone GJ, Brouwers HB, Biffi A, et al. Warfarin and statins are associated with hematoma volume in primary infratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21:192–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheitz JF, Seiffge DJ, Tütüncü S, et al. Dose-related effects of statins on symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and outcome after thrombolysis for ischemic stroke. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2014;45:509–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pandit AK, Kumar P, Kumar A, et al. High-dose statin therapy and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;134:22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Badillo R, Schmidt R, Mortensen EM, et al. Statin therapy and gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score-matching. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:849–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geng J, Song Y, Mu Z, et al. Early use of statin in patients treated with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;121:269–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gulmez SE, Lassen AT, Aalykke C, et al. Do statins protect against upper gastrointestinal bleeding? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67:460–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKinney JS, Kostis WJ. Statin therapy and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2012;43:2149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Rein N, Cannegieter SC, le Cessie S, et al. Statins and risk of bleeding: an analysis to evaluate possible bias due to prevalent users and healthy user aspects. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:930–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ray KK, Cannon CP. The potential relevance of the multiple lipid-independent (pleiotropic) effects of statins in the management of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1425–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tariq M, Khan HA, Elfaki I, et al. Gastric antisecretory and antiulcer effects of simvastatin in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2316–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Özbakiş-Dengız G, Hekımoğlu A, Kandemır N, et al. Effects of statins in an indomethacin-induced gastric injury model in rats. Turk J Gastroenterol Off J Turk Soc Gastroenterol. 2012;23:456–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timoshin SS, Bragina VV, Lebedko OA, et al. Effect of HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor on DNA synthesis and free radical oxidation in the gastric mucosa under normal conditions and during indometacin-induced ulcerative process in the stomach of albino mice. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2012;152:298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shin D, Yoon D, Lim SG, et al. Comparison of the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding among different statin exposures with concomitant administration of warfarin: electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antoniou T, Macdonald EM, Yao Z, et al. Association between statin use and ischemic stroke or major hemorrhage in patients taking dabigatran for atrial fibrillation. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189:E4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Leerdam ME. Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22:209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Longstreth GF. Epidemiology and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:419–24.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cryer BL, Wilcox CM, Henk HJ, et al. The economics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a US managed-care setting: a retrospective, claims-based analysis. J Med Econ. 2010;13:70–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:915–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Truven Health Analytics. Truven Health MarketScan(R) Research Databases. Ann Arbor; 2015.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of human subjects [Internet]. CFR. Sect. 46.102; 2009. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  30. 30.
    SAS Institute Inc. SAS Enterprise Guide Software. Report No.: Version 7.1, Cary; 2014.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schneeweiss S, Patrick AR, Stürmer T, et al. Increasing levels of restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies of elderly and comparison with randomized trial results. Med Care. 2007;45:S131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Petri H, Urquhart J. Channeling bias in the interpretation of drug effects. Stat Med. 1991;10:577–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Solomon DH, Avorn J, Stürmer T, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in new users of coxibs and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: high-risk subgroups and time course of risk. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1378–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wojcicka A, Bassett JHD, Williams GR. Mechanisms of action of thyroid hormones in the skeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:3979–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weiss RE, Refetoff S. Effect of thyroid hormone on growth. Lessons from the syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 1996;25:719–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grais IM, Sowers JR. Thyroid and the heart. Am J Med. 2014;127:691–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brenta G, Danzi S, Klein I. Potential therapeutic applications of thyroid hormone analogs. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:632–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mullur R, Liu Y-Y, Brent GA. Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:355–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dorgalaleh A, Mahmoodi M, Varmaghani B, et al. Effect of thyroid dysfunctions on blood cell count and red blood cell indice. Iran J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;3:73–7.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Iddah MA, Macharia BN, Ng’wena AG, et al. Thyroid hormones and hematological indices levels in thyroid disorders patients at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Western Kenya. ISRN Endocrinol [Internet]; 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3649456/. Cited 9 Aug 2016.
  42. 42.
    Wolters Kluwer. Medi-Span electronic drug file [Internet]. http://www.wolterskluwercdi.com/drug-data/medi-span-electronic-drug-file/. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  43. 43.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching [Internet]. Report No.: IZA DP No. 1588. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor; 2005. http://ftp.iza.org/dp1588.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2017.
  45. 45.
    Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, et al. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bryson A, Dorsett R, Purdon S. The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Report No.: Working Paper No. 4. Department for Work and Pensions; 2002.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rubin D, Thomas N. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics. 1996;52:249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heckman J, Ichimura H, Smith J, et al. Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica. 1998;66:1017–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stürmer T, Wyss R, Glynn RJ, et al. Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs. J Intern Med. 2014;275:570–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sato T, Matsuyama Y. Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2003;14:680–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee BK, Lessler J, Stuart EA. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting. PLoS One [Internet]; 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069059/. Cited 24 July 2018.
  52. 52.
    Elze MC, Gregson J, Baber U, et al. Comparison of propensity score methods and covariate adjustment: evaluation in 4 cardiovascular studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Valliant R, Brick JM. Weight adjustments for the grouped jackknife variance estimator. J Off Stat Stockh. 2008;24:469.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hernán MA. The hazards of hazard ratios. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2010;21:13–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Suissa D, Brassard P, Smiechowski B, et al. Number needed to treat is incorrect without proper time-related considerations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:42–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pignatelli P, Carnevale R, Di Santo S, et al. Rosuvastatin reduces platelet recruitment by inhibiting NADPH oxidase activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:1635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016;316:1997–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Colli S, Eligini S, Lalli M, et al. Vastatins inhibit tissue factor in cultured human macrophages. A novel mechanism of protection against atherothrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhao Q, Li M, Chen M, et al. Lovastatin induces platelet apoptosis. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;42:69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Leonard CE, Brensinger CM, Bilker WB, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in concomitant users of warfarin and antihyperlipidemics. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:761–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Young JC, Stürmer T, Lund JL, et al. Predictors of prevalent statin use among older adults identified as statin initiators based on Medicare claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:836–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Li X, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA. Evidence of sample use among new users of statins: implications for pharmacoepidemiology. Med Care. 2014;52:773–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of PharmacyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and PolicyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology, College of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  4. 4.Sanders-Brown Center on AgingLexingtonUSA
  5. 5.College of PharmacyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations