Advertisement

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 183–200 | Cite as

Suboptimal Use of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Has the Introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Improved Prescribing Practices?

  • Endalkachew A. AlamnehEmail author
  • Leanne Chalmers
  • Luke R. Bereznicki
Systematic Review

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and the associated risk of stroke are emerging epidemics throughout the world. Suboptimal use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention has been widely reported from observational studies. In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced for thromboprophylaxis. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate current practices of anticoagulation in AF, pharmacologic features and adoption patterns of DOACs, their impacts on proportion of eligible patients with AF who receive oral anticoagulants, persisting challenges and future prospects for optimal anticoagulation.

Literature Source and Selection Criteria

In conducting this review, we considered the results of relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies from real-world practice settings. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus (RIS), Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science were used to source relevant literature. There were no date limitations, while language was limited to English. Selection was limited to articles from peer reviewed journals and related to our topic.

Results

Most studies identified in this review indicated suboptimal use of anticoagulants is a persisting challenge despite the availability of DOACs. Underuse of oral anticoagulants is apparent particularly in patients with a high risk of stroke. DOAC adoption trends are quite variable, with slow integration into clinical practice reported in most countries; there has been limited impact to date on prescribing practice.

Conclusion

Available data from clinical practice suggest that suboptimal oral anticoagulant use in patients with AF and poor compliance with guidelines still remain commonplace despite transition to a new era of anticoagulation featuring DOACs.

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin International Normalize Ratio Dabigatran Rivaroxaban 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Funding

No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Disclosure/conflict of interest

Endalkachew Admassie Alamneh has no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Leanne Chalmers has received consultancy funding from Aspen Pharmacare Australia. Luke Bereznicki has received consultancy funding to research activities regarding anticoagulant medications from Roche Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim and Aspen Pharmacare Australia. In 2015, he was a member of the Pradaxa Advisory Board in Australia.

References

  1. 1.
    Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114(2):119–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285(18):2370–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(35):2746–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freedman JE, Gersh BJ. Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention in aging patients: what’s good can be even better. Circulation. 2014;130(2):129–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chugh SS, Roth GA, Gillum RF, Mensah GA. Global burden of atrial fibrillation in developed and developing nations. Glob Heart. 2014;9(1):113–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(11):639–54. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ball J, Thompson DR, Ski CF, Carrington MJ, Gerber T, Stewart S. Estimating the current and future prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Australian adult population. Med J Aust. 2015;202(1):32–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen TN, Hilmer SN, Cumming RG. Review of epidemiology and management of atrial fibrillation in developing countries. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2412–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2369–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foley J, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. Primary prevention of ischaemic stroke in atrial fibrillation: new oral anticoagulant drugs for all? Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2014;12(3):373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(4):e18–209.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marini C, De Santis F, Sacco S, et al. Contribution of atrial fibrillation to incidence and outcome of ischemic stroke: results from a population-based study. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1115–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000166053.83476.4a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reiffel JA. Atrial fibrillation and stroke: epidemiology. Am J Med. 2014;127(4):e15–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.06.002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wardrop D, Keeling D. The story of the discovery of heparin and warfarin. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(6):757–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07119.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):493–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bassand JP. Review of atrial fibrillation outcome trials of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. Europace. 2012;14(3):312–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akao M, Chun YH, Wada H, et al. Current status of clinical background of patients with atrial fibrillation in a community-based survey: the Fushimi AF Registry. J Cardiol. 2013;61(4):260–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.12.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bratland B, Hornnes MB. Warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation in general practice–is bleeding risk underestimated? Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2014;134(2):175–9. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(12):857–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R, et al. Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(10):1095–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reynolds MW, Fahrbach K, Hauch O, et al. Warfarin anticoagulation and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest. 2004;126(6):1938–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wan Y, Heneghan C, Perera R, et al. Anticoagulation control and prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1(2):84–91. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.108.796185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cousins DH, Gerrett D, Warner B. A review of medication incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales over 6 years (2005–2010). Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74(4):597–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04166.x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nutescu EA, Shapiro NL, Chevalier A, Amin AN. A pharmacologic overview of current and emerging anticoagulants. Clevel Clin J Med. 2005;72(Suppl 1):S2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norgard NB, Dinicolantonio JJ, Topping TJ, Wee B. Novel anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation stroke prevention. Ther Adv Chronic Disease. 2012;3(3):123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Armaganijan L, Eikelboom J, Healey JS, Morillo CA. New pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: update 2010. Adv Therapy. 2009;26(12):1058–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lip GY, Andreotti F, Fauchier L, et al. Bleeding risk assessment and management in atrial fibrillation patients. Executive Summary of a Position Document from the European Heart Rhythm Association [EHRA], endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology [ESC] Working Group on Thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(6):997–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Odum LE, Cochran KA, Aistrope DS, Snella KA. The CHADS(2) versus the new CHA2DS2-VASc scoring systems for guiding antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: review of the literature and recommendations for use. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32(3):285–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Senoo K, Lane D, Lip GY. Stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation. Korean Circ J. 2014;44(5):281–90. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.5.281.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dzeshka MS, Lane DA, Lip GY. Stroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation: navigating the alphabet soup of risk-score acronyms (CHADS2, CHA2 DS2-VASc, R2 CHADS2, HAS-BLED, ATRIA, and more). Clin Cardiol. 2014;37(10):634–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lip GY. Recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in the 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines on atrial fibrillation: a commentary. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(4):615–26. doi: 10.1111/jth.12140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    National Clinical Guideline C. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Atrial Fibrillation: The Management of Atrial Fibrillation. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), Copyright (c) National Clinical Guidelince Center; 2014.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gamra H, Murin J, Chiang CE, Naditch-Brule L, Brette S, Steg PG. Use of antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation in Africa, Europe, Asia and South America: insights from the International RealiseAF Survey. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(2):77–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mohammed MA, Marshall T, Nirantharakumar K, Stevens A, Fitzmaurice D. Patterns of warfarin use in subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional analysis of 430 general practices in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e61979.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bednarski J, Cieszewska E, Strzelecki A, Filipiak KJ. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients in the clinical practice of a single district hospital in Poland. Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(12):1260–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, et al. International longitudinal registry of patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD). Am Heart J. 2012;163(1):13–9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.011.
  40. 40.
    Huisman MV, Lip GY, Diener HC, et al. Design and rationale of Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a global registry program on long-term oral antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2014;167(3):329–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cullen MW, Kim S, Piccini JP, et al. Risks and benefits of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: insights from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(4):461–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kirchhof P, Ammentorp B, Darius H, et al. Management of atrial fibrillation in seven European countries after the publication of the 2010 ESC guidelines on atrial fibrillation: primary results of the PREvention oF thromboemolic events–European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF). Europace. 2014;16(1):6–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Verma A, Cairns JA, Mitchell LB, et al. 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(10):1114–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.08.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nieuwlaat R, Capucci A, Lip GY, et al. Antithrombotic treatment in real-life atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(24):3018–26. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Waldo AL, Becker RC, Tapson VF, Colgan KJ. Hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke are not being provided with adequate anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(9):1729–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCormick D, Gurwitz JH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prevalence and quality of warfarin use for patients with atrial fibrillation in the long-term care setting. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(20):2458–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chan PS, Maddox TM, Tang F, Spinler S, Spertus JA. Practice-level variation in warfarin use among outpatients with atrial fibrillation (from the NCDR PINNACLE program). Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(8):1136–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Akao M, Chun YH, Esato M, et al. Inappropriate use of oral anticoagulants for patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2014;78(9):2166–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang C, Yang Z, Wang C, et al. Significant underuse of warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: results from the china national stroke registry. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(5):1157–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.10.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ogilvie IM, Newton N, Welner SA. Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2010;123(7):638–45.e4.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Piyaskulkaew C, Singh T, Szpunar S, Saravolatz L 2nd, Rosman H. CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc versus CHADS(2) for stroke risk assessment in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study from a single center of the NCDR-PINNACLE registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;37(4):400–3. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0983-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lip GY, Skjoth F, Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB. Oral anticoagulation, aspirin, or no therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF with 0 or 1 stroke risk factor based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(14):1385–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barnes GD, Kaatz S, Winfield J, et al. Warfarin use in atrial fibrillation patients at low risk for stroke: analysis of the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI(2)). J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014;37(2):171–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lip GY, Laroche C, Dan GA, et al. A prospective survey in European Society of Cardiology member countries of atrial fibrillation management: baseline results of EURObservational Research Programme Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) Pilot General Registry. Europace. 2014;16(3):308–19. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Suarez J, Piccini JP, Liang L, et al. International variation in use of oral anticoagulation among heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2012;163(5):804–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zimetbaum PJ, Thosani A, Yu HT, et al. Are atrial fibrillation patients receiving warfarin in accordance with stroke risk? Am J Med. 2010;123(5):446–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kimmel SE, Chen Z, Price M, et al. The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin: results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):229–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Brandes A, Overgaard M, Plauborg L, et al. Guideline adherence of antithrombotic treatment initiated by general practitioners in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Danish survey. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(7):427–32. doi: 10.1002/clc.22133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation The Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2010:ehq278.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, et al. Warfarin discontinuation after starting warfarin for atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(6):624–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    De Schryver EL, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, Koudstaal PJ, Algra A. Non-adherence to aspirin or oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol. 2005;252(11):1316–21. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0858-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Baker WL, Cios DA, Sander SD, Coleman CI. Meta-analysis to assess the quality of warfarin control in atrial fibrillation patients in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15(3):244–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Oldgren J, Healey JS, Ezekowitz M, et al. Variations in cause and management of atrial fibrillation in a prospective registry of 15,400 emergency department patients in 46 countries: the RE-LY Atrial Fibrillation Registry. Circulation. 2014;129(15):1568–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    DeWilde S, Carey IM, Emmas C, Richards N, Cook DG. Trends in the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation, its treatment with anticoagulation and predictors of such treatment in UK primary care. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2006;92(8):1064–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Reynolds MR, Shah J, Essebag V, et al. Patterns and predictors of warfarin use in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation from the FRACTAL Registry. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(4):538–43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Deitelzweig SB, Buysman E, Pinsky B, et al. Warfarin use and stroke risk among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in a large managed care population. Clin Ther. 2013;35(8):1201–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Haim M, Hoshen M, Reges O, Rabi Y, Balicer R, Leibowitz M. Prospective national study of the prevalence, incidence, management and outcome of a large contemporary cohort of patients with incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1):e001486. doi: 10.1161/jaha.114.001486.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Meiltz A, Zimmermann M, Urban P, Bloch A. Atrial fibrillation management by practice cardiologists: a prospective survey on the adherence to guidelines in the real world. Europace. 2008;10(6):674–80. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Atarashi H, Inoue H, Okumura K, et al. Present status of anticoagulation treatment in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the J-RHYTHM Registry. Circ J. 2011;75(6):1328–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lip G, Bassand J-P, Fitzmaurice D, et al. Inappropriate utilization of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: the global anticoagulant registry in the field (garfield) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(13s1):E670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Holt TA, Hunter TD, Gunnarsson C, et al. Risk of stroke and oral anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(603):e710–7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X656856.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Barrios V, Calderon A, Escobar C, de la Figuera M. Patients with atrial fibrillation in a primary care setting: Val-FAAP study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl ed). 2012;65(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.08.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cowan C, Healicon R, Robson I, et al. The use of anticoagulants in the management of atrial fibrillation among general practices in England. Heart. 2013;99(16):1166–72. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303472.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Eriksson BI, Quinlan DJ, Weitz JI. Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral direct thrombin and factor xa inhibitors in development. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(1):1–22. doi: 10.2165/0003088-200948010-00001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Harder S, Graff J. Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(9):1617–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Haft JI. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: impact of novel oral anticoagulants. Clin Applied Thromb Hemost. 2013;19(3):241–8.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Perez A, Eraso LH, Merli GJ. Implications of new anticoagulants in primary practice. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(2):139–56. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Ezekowitz MD, et al. The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study. Circulation. 2013;128(3):237–43. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.112.001139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15(5):625–51. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–92.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2093–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):806–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Antman EM, et al. Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). Am Heart J. 2010;160(4):635–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wallentin L, Lopes RD, Hanna M, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of predicted international normalized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2166–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sardar P, Chatterjee S, Lavie CJ, et al. Risk of major bleeding in different indications for new oral anticoagulants: insights from a meta-analysis of approved dosages from 50 randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2015;179:279–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Bartolini C, et al. Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian meta-analysis approach. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(1):7–20. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.971009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Larsen TB, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Rasmussen LH, Skjoth F, Rosenzweig M, Lip GY. Bleeding events among new starters and switchers to dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2014;127(7):650–6.e5.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955–62. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62343-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Labaf A, Carlwe M, Svensson PJ. Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in clinical practice: a report from three centers in Sweden. Thromb J. 2014;12(1):29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Savelieva I, Camm AJ. Practical considerations for using novel oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37(1):32–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gonsalves WI, Pruthi RK, Patnaik MM, editors. The new oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Elsevier; 2013.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Fareed J, Thethi I, Hoppensteadt D. Old versus new oral anticoagulants: focus on pharmacology. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;52:79–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lu Y, Branstad R, Karim RM, Asinger RW. Consideration of clinical variables for choosing new anticoagulant alternatives to warfarin for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;39(6):628–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mohanty BD, Looser PM, Gokanapudy LR, et al. Controversies regarding the new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Vasc Med (London, England). 2014;19(3):190–204. doi: 10.1177/1358863x14532869.
  97. 97.
    Poulsen BK, Grove EL, Husted SE. New oral anticoagulants. Drugs. 2012;72(13):1739–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Salem JE, Sabouret P, Funck-Brentano C, Hulot JS. Pharmacology and mechanisms of action of new oral anticoagulants. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2015;29(1):10–20. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Steinberg BA, Piccini JP. Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2014;348:g2116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2116.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wang Y, Bajorek B. New oral anticoagulants in practice: pharmacological and practical considerations. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014;14(3):175–89. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0061-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Arepally GM, Ortel TL. Changing practice of anticoagulation: will target-specific anticoagulants replace warfarin? Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:241–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bista D, Chalmers L, Bereznicki L, Peterson G. Potential use of NOACs in developing countries: pros and cons. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(7):817–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Huisman MV, Rothman KJ, Paquette M, Teutsch C, Diener HC, Dubner SJ, et al. Antithrombotic treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the GLORIA-AF Registry, Phase II. Am J Med. 2015;128(12):1306–13.e1.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Xu Y, Holbrook AM, Simpson CS, Dowlatshahi D, Johnson AP. Prescribing patterns of novel oral anticoagulants following regulatory approval for atrial fibrillation in Ontario, Canada: a population-based descriptive analysis. CMAJ open. 2013;1(3):E115–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Steinberg BA, Holmes DN, Piccini JP, et al. Early adoption of dabigatran and its dosing in US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(6):e000535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Desai NR, Krumme AA, Schneeweiss S, et al. Patterns of initiation of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation—quality and cost implications. Am J Med. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.013.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Banerjee A, Lane DA, Torp-Pedersen C, Lip GY. Net clinical benefit of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus no treatment in a ‘real world’ atrial fibrillation population: a modelling analysis based on a nationwide cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107(3):584–9. doi: 10.1160/th11-11-0784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sorea C, Georger F, Makhoul R. 0203: analysis of antithrombotic therapy in patients over 75 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: do we apply the guidelines to elderly subjects? Arch Cardiovasc Dis Suppl. 2014;6:4.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kirley K, Qato DM, Kornfield R, Stafford RS, Alexander GC. National trends in oral anticoagulant use in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(5):615–21. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.112.967299.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Biskupiak J, Ghate S, Hamilton M, et al. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization in atrial fibrillation after the introduction of novel oral anticoagulants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12_S). doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(14)60326-0.
  111. 111.
    Shah N, Gosch K, Chan P, Marzec L, Ting H. Use of novel oral anticoagulants for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from the NCDR PINNACLE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(12_S). doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(14)60332-6.
  112. 112.
    Gibbs H, Kakkar A. One year Australian outcome results of cohort 1 of the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD) study. Heart, Lung Circ. 2013;22:S221-S.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hamilton M, Kawabata H, Liu X, Brixner D, Biskupiak J. Utilization patterns of anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation after the entry of novel oral anticoagulants in the United States. Circulation. 2012;126(21 Supplement):A9664.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Verdino RJ. Untreated atrial fibrillation in the United States of America: understanding the barriers and treatment options. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015;27(1):44–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Deitelzweig S. Practical considerations in the use of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;32(2):74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Lauffenburger JC, Farley JF, Gehi AK, Rhoney DH, Brookhart MA, Fang G. Factors driving anticoagulant selection in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(8):1095–101.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Olesen JB, Sorensen R, Hansen ML, et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation agents in anticoagulant naive atrial fibrillation patients: Danish nationwide descriptive data 2011–2013. Europace: 2015;17(2):187–93. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, et al. Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63479.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sorensen R, Gislason G, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Dabigatran use in Danish atrial fibrillation patients in 2011: a nationwide study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002758.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Gorczyca-Michta I, Wozakowska-Kaplon B. New oral anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation: a single centre experience. Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(2):85–93. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Lauffenburger JC, Farley JF, Gehi AK, Rhoney DH, Brookhart MA, Fang G. Factors driving anticoagulant selection in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.539.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Granger CB, Armaganijan LV. Newer oral anticoagulants should be used as first-line agents to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and risk factors for stroke or thromboembolism. Circulation. 2012;125(1):159–64 (discussion 64).Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Hernandez Olmedo M, Suarez Fernandez C. Progress of anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation. Med Clin. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.07.018.
  124. 124.
    Suryanarayan D, Schulman S. When the rubber meets the road: adherence and persistence with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and old oral anticoagulants in the real world—a problem or a myth ? Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40(8):852–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Greinacher A, Thiele T, Selleng K. Reversal of anticoagulants: an overview of current developments. Thromb Haemost. 2015;113(5):931–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Ebright J, Mousa SA. Oral Anticoagulants and status of antidotes for the reversal of bleeding risk. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015;21(2):105–14. doi: 10.1177/1076029614545211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation. 2011;124(14):1573–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Schiele F, van Ryn J, Canada K, et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: functional and structural characterization. Blood. 2013;121(18):3554–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):511–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Burness CB. Idarucizumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2015;75(18):2155–61. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0508-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Lu G, DeGuzman FR, Hollenbach SJ, et al. A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa. Nat Med. 2013;19(4):446–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Duran A, Sengupta N, Diamantopoulos A, et al. Cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for prevention of post-surgical venous thromboembolism from a U.S. payer’s perspective. PharmacoEconomics. 2012;30(2):87–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Cutler DM, Everett W. Thinking outside the pillbox–medication adherence as a priority for health care reform. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1553–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Freeman JV, Zhu RP, Owens DK, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(1):1–11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Shah SV, Gage BF. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2011;123(22):2562–70. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.985655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Deitelzweig S, Amin A, Jing Y, et al. Medical cost reductions associated with the usage of novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients, based on the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE trials. J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):776–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1206–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Desai J, Kolb JM, Weitz JI, Aisenberg J. Gastrointestinal bleeding with the new oral anticoagulants—defining the issues and the management strategies. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110(8):205–12. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    De Caterina R, Husted S, Wallentin L, et al. General mechanisms of coagulation and targets of anticoagulants (Section I). Position Paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis-Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109(4):569–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Endalkachew A. Alamneh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leanne Chalmers
    • 1
  • Luke R. Bereznicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of PharmacySchool of Medicine, University of TasmaniaTasmaniaAustralia

Personalised recommendations