Advertisement

Heavy metal content and health risk assessment of commonly patronized herbal medicinal preparations from the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana

  • Frank Adusei-Mensah
  • David Kofi Essumang
  • Richard Osei Agjei
  • Jussi Kauhanen
  • Carina Tikkanen-Kaukanen
  • Martins EkorEmail author
Research Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To address the question of whether users of herbal products (HPs) are exposed to harmful contaminants, we evaluated six HPs mostly patronized in Kumasi for heavy metal contamination and assessed the health risk associated with their use. This study is one of the first safety evaluation studies on finished multiherbal products in the region.

Method

Three antimalarial, two antidiabetic and one antihypertensive HPs were selected after a mini-survey and coded randomly as HP A-F. The HPs were acid digested for quantitative analysis of heavy metals using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer. Hg quantification was carried out using cold vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Results

The cancer risk estimation values for the carcinogenic metals ranged between 1.54 × 10−9 to 3.73 × 10−4 and were all within acceptable limits. The non-cancer health risk evaluation revealed that, some of the products pose health risk to consumers. The estimated daily intake (EDI) for As in HPF was 2.48 × 10−4 mg/kg/day compared to the reference limit of 1.67 × 10−4 mg/kg/day. HPF also had high hazard index (HI) of 5.70 (HI >1) in children as compared to 1.68 (HI >1) in adults showing a 3.4 folds increase in the health risk among the former.

Conclusion

The six polyherbal products exhibited carcinogenic risk within acceptable limits. Although, the non-carcinogenic risk assessment of products HPA to HPE suggests safety, this can only be ascertained after further characterization of their health risks in detailed chronic toxicity studies. The high HI for product HPF suggests health risk for consumers of this product.

Keywords

Cancer risk Estimated daily intake Exposure Hazard index Hazard quotient Heavy metals Herbal medicinal products Risk assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Mr. Isaac Tabiri Henneh and Joseph Acqua-Mills of the Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, and University of Cape Coast, Ghana for their enormous and selfless contributions towards this project.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in carrying out any part of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Kosalec I, Cvek J, Tomić S. Contaminants of medicinal herbs and herbal products. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2009;60:485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adusei-Mensah F, Inkum EI. Has the recent upsurge in traditional herbal medicine in Ghanaian market been translated into the health of the Ghanaian public: a retrospective cohort study? Int J Novel Res Healthc Nurs. 2015;2:98–106.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHO | WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014–2023 [Internet]. WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/traditional/trm_strategy14_23/en/. Accessed 2017 Aug 13.
  4. 4.
    Aziato L, Antwi HO. Facilitators and barriers of herbal medicine use in Accra, Ghana: an inductive exploratory study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaban NS, Abdou KA, Hassan NE-HY. Impact of toxic heavy metals and pesticide residues in herbal products. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2016;5:102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gasser U, Klier B, Kühn AV, Steinhoff B. Current findings on the heavy metal content in herbal drugs. Pharmeur Sci Notes. 2009;2009:37–50.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bempah CK, Ewusi A. Heavy metals contamination and human health risk assessment around Obuasi gold mine in Ghana. Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188:261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Street RA. Heavy metals in medicinal plant products — an African perspective. S Afr J Bot. 2012;82:67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Ikenaka Y, Akoto O, Baidoo E, Mizukawa H, et al. Health risk assessment of heavy metals and metalloid in drinking water from communities near gold mines in Tarkwa, Ghana. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187:397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bortey-Sam N, Nakayama SMM, Akoto O, Ikenaka Y, Fobil JN, Baidoo E, et al. Accumulation of heavy metals and metalloid in foodstuffs from agricultural soils around Tarkwa area in Ghana, and associated human health risks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:8811–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nkansah MA, Opoku F, Ackumey AA. Risk assessment of mineral and heavy metal content of selected tea products from the Ghanaian market. Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188:332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tchounwou PB, Centeno JA, Patlolla AK. Arsenic toxicity, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis-a health risk assessment and management approach. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;255:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matta G, Gjyli L. Mercury, lead and arsenic: impact on environment and human health. J Chem Pharm Sci. 2016;9:718–25.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carlin DJ, Naujokas MF, Bradham KD, Cowden J, Heacock M, Henry HF, et al. Arsenic and environmental health: state of the science and future research opportunities. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:890–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naujokas MF, Anderson B, Ahsan H, Aposhian HV, Graziano JH, Thompson C, et al. The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Carocci A, Lauria G, Catalano A. Mercury exposure and heart diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1):74.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010074.
  17. 17.
    McElroy JA, Kruse RL, Guthrie J, Gangnon RE, Robertson JD. Cadmium exposure and endometrial cancer risk: a large midwestern U.S. population-based case-control study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garner R, Levallois P. Cadmium levels and sources of exposure among Canadian adults. Health Rep. 2016;27:11.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dhanavathy G, Jayakumar S. Acute and subchronic toxicity studies of Swertiamarin a lead compound isolated from Enicostemma Littorale .blume in wistar rats. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2017;14:381–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tracqui A, Tayot J, Kintz P, Alves G, Bosque MA, Mangin P. Determination of manganese in human brain samples. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;76:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Busheina IS, Abobaker MM, Aljurmi ES, Etorki AM. Determination of selenium in environmental samples using hydride generation coupled to atomic absorption spectroscopy. J Environ Anal Chem. 2016;3:180.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamunda C, Mathuthu M, Madhuku M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils from witwatersrand gold mining basin, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7):663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    SERAS, United States Environmental Protection Agency SOP 1811 (EPA/SW-846 Methods 3015/3050B/6010B). Determination of Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Methods. 2006. 1811;3–23.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kokot ZJ, Matysiak J. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry determination of metals in honeybee venom. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;48:955–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ekhator OC, Udowelle NA, Igbiri S, Asomugha RN, Igweze ZN, Orisakwe OE. Safety evaluation of potential toxic metals exposure from street foods consumed in mid-West Nigeria. J Environ Public Health [online article]. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8458057.
  26. 26.
    Mohammed E, Mohammed T, Mohammed A. Optimization of instrument conditions for the analysis for mercury, arsenic, antimony and selenium by atomic absorption spectroscopy. MethodsX. 2018;5:824–33. ISSN 2215-0161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dominski P., Shrader DE. Automated cold vapor determination of mercury: EPA stannous chloride methodology. Santa Clara: Agilent Technology Incorporation; 2010.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cui J. Using cold vapor generation atomic absorption to determine mercury impurities in pharmaceutical products. Bremen: Thermo Fisher Scientific; 2016.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh RK, Sharma MA, Marshall FM. Risk assessment of heavy metal toxicity through contaminated vegetables from waste water irrigated area of Varanasi, India. Trop Ecol. 2010;51(2):375–87.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ou X, Wang L, Guo L, Cui X, Liu D, Yang Y. Soil-plant metal relations in Panax notoginseng: an ecosystem health risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Biritwum R, Gyapong J, Mensah G. The epidemiology of obesity in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2005;39:82–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    FAO/WHO (Codex Alimentarious Commission, CAC/GL 80–2013), International Food Standards. Guidelines on the application of risk assessment for feed. Rome: FAO/WHO; 2013; p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    US EPA O. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part A [Internet]. US EPA. 2015. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part. Accessed 2018 May 16.
  34. 34.
    Chauhan CG. U.K. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of vegetables grown in wastewater irrigated area of Rewa, India. IJSRP. 2014; 4(9):2250–3153.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koram K, Barcus MJ, Binka FN, Owusu Agyei S, Hoffman SL, Utz GC, et al. Seasonal malaria attack rates in infants and young children in northern Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harrison RM, Chirgawi MB. The assessment of air and soil as contributors of some trace metals to vegetable plants. I. Use of a filtered air growth cabinet. Sci Total Environ. 1989;83:13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    US EPA opens inorganic arsenic cancer assessment for public review | EVISA’s News [Internet]. Available from: http://www.speciation.net/News/US-EPA-opens-inorganic-arsenic-cancer-assessment-for-public-review-;~/2010/02/23/4877.html. Accessed 2018 May 16.
  38. 38.
    Ullah AKMA, Maksud MA, Khan SR, Lutfa LN, Quraishi SB. Dietary intake of heavy metals from eight highly consumed species of cultured fish and possible human health risk implications in Bangladesh. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:574–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    California Environmental Protection Agency CalEPA (OEHHA agency). Lead and lead compounds. 2019. Available at https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals/lead-and-lead-compounds. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
  40. 40.
    Slope Factors (SF) for Carcinogens from US EPA. US EPA region III (2007). Available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
  41. 41.
    Hajra B, Qayum I, Orakzai S, Hussain F, Faryal U, Aurangzeb. Evaluation of toxic heavy metals in Ayurvedic syrups sold in local markets of Hazara, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC. 2015;27:183–6.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yunus M, Sohel N, Hore SK, Rahman M. Arsenic exposure and adverse health effects: a review of recent findings from arsenicand health studies in Matlab, Bangladesh. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011;27(9):371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Chatterjee A, Das D, Das B, Nayak B, et al. Fate of over 480 million inhabitants living in arsenic and fluoride endemic Indian districts: magnitude, health, socio-economic effects and mitigation approaches. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2016;38:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Water NRC (US) C on C in D. Health Effects of Excess Copper [Internet]. National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225400/. Accessed 2018 Apr 9.
  45. 45.
    Shakir SK, Azizullah A, Murad W, Daud MK, Nabeela F, Rahman H, et al. Toxic metal pollution in Pakistan and its possible risks to public health. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017;242:1–60.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang X, Sato T, Xing B, Tao S. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350:28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sekwati-Monang B, Gaboutloeloe KG, Likuku SA. Investigation of Heavy Metal Hazards Status and Their Potential Health Risks in Vegetables Irrigated with Treated Wastewater in Oodi Gardens. Emerg Trends Chem Sci [online article]. Springer, Cham; 2016. p. 57–67. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-60408-4_5. Accessed 2018 Apr 16.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Adusei-Mensah
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • David Kofi Essumang
    • 4
  • Richard Osei Agjei
    • 5
  • Jussi Kauhanen
    • 3
  • Carina Tikkanen-Kaukanen
    • 6
  • Martins Ekor
    • 7
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  2. 2.School of Public HealthTexila American UniversityGeorgetownGuyana
  3. 3.Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry, School of Physical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana
  5. 5.Department of ChemistryThe University of Eastern FinlandJoensuu CampusFinland
  6. 6.Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science and Ruralia InstituteUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  7. 7.Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana

Personalised recommendations