Heavy metal content and health risk assessment of commonly patronized herbal medicinal preparations from the Kumasi metropolis of Ghana
- 39 Downloads
To address the question of whether users of herbal products (HPs) are exposed to harmful contaminants, we evaluated six HPs mostly patronized in Kumasi for heavy metal contamination and assessed the health risk associated with their use. This study is one of the first safety evaluation studies on finished multiherbal products in the region.
Three antimalarial, two antidiabetic and one antihypertensive HPs were selected after a mini-survey and coded randomly as HP A-F. The HPs were acid digested for quantitative analysis of heavy metals using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer. Hg quantification was carried out using cold vapour atomic absorption spectroscopy.
The cancer risk estimation values for the carcinogenic metals ranged between 1.54 × 10−9 to 3.73 × 10−4 and were all within acceptable limits. The non-cancer health risk evaluation revealed that, some of the products pose health risk to consumers. The estimated daily intake (EDI) for As in HPF was 2.48 × 10−4 mg/kg/day compared to the reference limit of 1.67 × 10−4 mg/kg/day. HPF also had high hazard index (HI) of 5.70 (HI >1) in children as compared to 1.68 (HI >1) in adults showing a 3.4 folds increase in the health risk among the former.
The six polyherbal products exhibited carcinogenic risk within acceptable limits. Although, the non-carcinogenic risk assessment of products HPA to HPE suggests safety, this can only be ascertained after further characterization of their health risks in detailed chronic toxicity studies. The high HI for product HPF suggests health risk for consumers of this product.
KeywordsCancer risk Estimated daily intake Exposure Hazard index Hazard quotient Heavy metals Herbal medicinal products Risk assessment
The authors acknowledge Mr. Isaac Tabiri Henneh and Joseph Acqua-Mills of the Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, and University of Cape Coast, Ghana for their enormous and selfless contributions towards this project.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in carrying out any part of this work.
- 2.Adusei-Mensah F, Inkum EI. Has the recent upsurge in traditional herbal medicine in Ghanaian market been translated into the health of the Ghanaian public: a retrospective cohort study? Int J Novel Res Healthc Nurs. 2015;2:98–106.Google Scholar
- 3.WHO | WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014–2023 [Internet]. WHO. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/traditional/trm_strategy14_23/en/. Accessed 2017 Aug 13.
- 6.Gasser U, Klier B, Kühn AV, Steinhoff B. Current findings on the heavy metal content in herbal drugs. Pharmeur Sci Notes. 2009;2009:37–50.Google Scholar
- 13.Matta G, Gjyli L. Mercury, lead and arsenic: impact on environment and human health. J Chem Pharm Sci. 2016;9:718–25.Google Scholar
- 16.Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Carocci A, Lauria G, Catalano A. Mercury exposure and heart diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(1):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14010074.
- 18.Garner R, Levallois P. Cadmium levels and sources of exposure among Canadian adults. Health Rep. 2016;27:11.Google Scholar
- 21.Busheina IS, Abobaker MM, Aljurmi ES, Etorki AM. Determination of selenium in environmental samples using hydride generation coupled to atomic absorption spectroscopy. J Environ Anal Chem. 2016;3:180.Google Scholar
- 23.SERAS, United States Environmental Protection Agency SOP 1811 (EPA/SW-846 Methods 3015/3050B/6010B). Determination of Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Methods. 2006. 1811;3–23.Google Scholar
- 25.Ekhator OC, Udowelle NA, Igbiri S, Asomugha RN, Igweze ZN, Orisakwe OE. Safety evaluation of potential toxic metals exposure from street foods consumed in mid-West Nigeria. J Environ Public Health [online article]. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8458057.
- 27.Dominski P., Shrader DE. Automated cold vapor determination of mercury: EPA stannous chloride methodology. Santa Clara: Agilent Technology Incorporation; 2010.Google Scholar
- 28.Cui J. Using cold vapor generation atomic absorption to determine mercury impurities in pharmaceutical products. Bremen: Thermo Fisher Scientific; 2016.Google Scholar
- 29.Singh RK, Sharma MA, Marshall FM. Risk assessment of heavy metal toxicity through contaminated vegetables from waste water irrigated area of Varanasi, India. Trop Ecol. 2010;51(2):375–87.Google Scholar
- 30.Ou X, Wang L, Guo L, Cui X, Liu D, Yang Y. Soil-plant metal relations in Panax notoginseng: an ecosystem health risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13.Google Scholar
- 31.Biritwum R, Gyapong J, Mensah G. The epidemiology of obesity in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2005;39:82–5.Google Scholar
- 32.FAO/WHO (Codex Alimentarious Commission, CAC/GL 80–2013), International Food Standards. Guidelines on the application of risk assessment for feed. Rome: FAO/WHO; 2013; p. 1–6.Google Scholar
- 33.US EPA O. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part A [Internet]. US EPA. 2015. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part. Accessed 2018 May 16.
- 34.Chauhan CG. U.K. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of vegetables grown in wastewater irrigated area of Rewa, India. IJSRP. 2014; 4(9):2250–3153.Google Scholar
- 37.US EPA opens inorganic arsenic cancer assessment for public review | EVISA’s News [Internet]. Available from: http://www.speciation.net/News/US-EPA-opens-inorganic-arsenic-cancer-assessment-for-public-review-;~/2010/02/23/4877.html. Accessed 2018 May 16.
- 39.California Environmental Protection Agency CalEPA (OEHHA agency). Lead and lead compounds. 2019. Available at https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals/lead-and-lead-compounds. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
- 40.Slope Factors (SF) for Carcinogens from US EPA. US EPA region III (2007). Available at http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
- 41.Hajra B, Qayum I, Orakzai S, Hussain F, Faryal U, Aurangzeb. Evaluation of toxic heavy metals in Ayurvedic syrups sold in local markets of Hazara, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC. 2015;27:183–6.Google Scholar
- 44.Water NRC (US) C on C in D. Health Effects of Excess Copper [Internet]. National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225400/. Accessed 2018 Apr 9.
- 45.Shakir SK, Azizullah A, Murad W, Daud MK, Nabeela F, Rahman H, et al. Toxic metal pollution in Pakistan and its possible risks to public health. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017;242:1–60.Google Scholar
- 47.Sekwati-Monang B, Gaboutloeloe KG, Likuku SA. Investigation of Heavy Metal Hazards Status and Their Potential Health Risks in Vegetables Irrigated with Treated Wastewater in Oodi Gardens. Emerg Trends Chem Sci [online article]. Springer, Cham; 2016. p. 57–67. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-60408-4_5. Accessed 2018 Apr 16.