Effects of noise on mental performance and annoyance considering task difficulty level and tone components of noise
- 9 Downloads
Rotating components in mechanical systems produce tonal noises and the presence of these tones effect the quality and comfort of occupants leading to annoyance and a decrease in mental performance. The ISO 1996-2 and ANSI S1.13 standards have described metrics to quantify the effects of prominent tones, but more research on how noise attributes effect annoyance and performance, especially in different levels of task difficulty are necessary. This paper investigates relations between noise metrics, annoyance responses and mental performance under different task difficulty levels while exposed to background noise with tonal components. In this study, sixty participants were evaluated on subjective perceived annoyance and varying workloads while exposed to 18 noise signals with three different prominence tones at three frequency tones and two background noise levels while doing three different levels of n-back tasks in a controlled test chamber. Performance parameters were measured by recording the reaction time, the correct rate, and the number of misses. The results indicate an increasing trend for number of misses and reaction times at higher task difficulty levels, but a decrease for correct rate. The study results showed a significant difference for subjective responses except for annoyance and loudness under different levels of task difficulty. The participants were more annoyed with higher background noise levels, lower tone frequencies and increasing tone levels especially under increasing task difficulty. Loudness metrics highly correlate with other noise metrics. Three models for the prediction of perceived annoyance are presented based on the most strongly correlated noise metrics using neural network models. Each of the three models had different input parameters and different network structures. The accuracy and MSE of all three neural network models show it to be appropriate for predicting perceived annoyance. The results show the effect of tonal noise on annoyance and mental performance especially in different levels of task difficulty. The results also suggest that neural network models have high accuracy and efficiency, and can be used to predict noise annoyance. Model 1 is preferred in certain aspects, such as lower input parameters, making it more user-friendly. The best neural network model included both loudness metrics and tonality metrics. It seems that combined metrics have the least importance and are unnecessary in the proposed neural network model.
KeywordsTonal noise annoyance Mental performance Task difficulty Noise metrics Neural network
The authors of this study would like to thank the Environmental and Occupational Hazard Control Research Center at the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for funding and support provided for this research (Grant No. 12957).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors wish to declare that there are no conflicts of interest that they are aware of.
Statement on ethical approval
This research was approved in the eighteenth research ethical committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences No. “IR.SBMU.PHNS.REC.1396.95.”. This is a research article involving “human participants” with “informed consent”.
- 2.Francis JM, Lee J, Wang LM, et al. Determining Annoyance Thresholds of Tones in Noise Determining Annoyance Thresholds of Tones in Noise https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4831499.
- 3.Lee J, Wang LM. Understanding Annoyance Perception of Noise With Tones Through Multidimensional Scaling Analysis 2015; 12–16.Google Scholar
- 4.ISO. “ISO/TS 15666:2003 Acoustics - Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio Acoustic Surveys.” 2003.Google Scholar
- 5.Marquis-Favre C, Premat E, Aubrée D. Noise and its effects--a review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part II: noise and annoyance. Acta Acust united with Acust. 2005;91:626–42.Google Scholar
- 7.Seattle. Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 25.08 Noise Control. 2007.Google Scholar
- 8.Los Angeles County, Ca. Noise control ordinance of the county of Los Angeles. 1978.Google Scholar
- 9.New York. N.Y. ADC. LAW } 27–770 : NY code – Section 27–770, “Noise Control of Mechanical Equipment”.2006.Google Scholar
- 12.Hellman, R. P. “Perceived magnitude of two-tone-noise complexes: loudness, annoyance, and noisiness”, J Acoust Soc Am (1985): vol 77, no 4, bll 1497–1504. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392044
- 17.Wang LM, Bowden EE. Performance review of indoor noise criteria. Archit Eng. 2003:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1061/40699(2003)2.
- 19.LandstrÖm, U., إKerlund, E., Kjellberg, A., & Tesarz, M. Exposure levels, tonal components, and noise annoyance in working environments. Environ Int, (1995): 21(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/01604120(95)00017-F.
- 27.Zwicker, E., and Fastl, H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. Springer Science & Business Media. (1995).Google Scholar
- 28.W. Wildman, U. model of psychoacoustic strength of sounds and its application Practice, the noise assessment. Dissertation, TU Munchen. (1992).Google Scholar
- 30.N. Genaro, A. Torija, A. Ramos-Ridao, I. Requena, D. P. Ruiz, En M. Zamorano, “A neural network based model for urban noise prediction”, J Acoust Soc Am (2010): vol 128, no 4, bll 1738–1746. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3473692 v.
- 31.American National Standard Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels in Air, American National Standards Institute ANSI S1.13–1995, (Acoustical Society of America, New York, 10005–3993).Google Scholar
- 32.Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 36 Appendix A, Federal Aviation Administration (1978).Google Scholar
- 33.Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 36 Appendix B, Federal Aviation Administration (1996).Google Scholar
- 34.Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 36 Appendix B, Federal Aviation Administration (1996).Google Scholar
- 36.ANSI/ASA. “ANSI/ASA S12.10–2010/Part 1 Acoustics – Measurement of Airborne Noise Emitted by Information Technology and Telecommunications Equipment – Part 1 : Determination of Sound Power Level and Emission Sound Pressure Level.” (2010).Google Scholar
- 37.Pedersen TH, Søndergaard M, Andersen B. Objective method for assessing the audibility of tones in noise joint Nordic method--version 2. DELTA. 2000;2000:4–14.Google Scholar
- 38.Federal Aviation Administration. Part 36. Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification.Google Scholar
- 39.ANSI. “ANSI S3.4–2007 Procedure for the Computation of Loudness of Steady Sounds.” 2007.Google Scholar
- 40.ISO. “ISO 1996-2:2007 Acoustics -- Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise -- Part 2: Determination of Environmental Noise Levels.” 2007.Google Scholar
- 41.AHRI. “AHRI/ANSI 1140–2012: Sound Quality Evaluation Procedures for Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Equipment.”(2012).Google Scholar