Improving municipal solid waste compost process by cycle time reduction through inoculation of Aspergillus niger
- 2 Downloads
A lack of understanding about the effect of microorganism inoculation on compost production and relatively expensive downstream processing are the main obstacles towards an economic compost production. Our work tries to fill this gap. For this, influence of inoculation on the composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) to produce compost with higher agronomic value was evaluated. Three similar aerated bioreactors (A, B and C) with the same size and shape in laboratory scale designed. Reactor A was inoculated with the Aspergillus niger IBRC-M 30095, reactor B was inoculated with old compost and reactor C was used as a control. During the composting process temperature, moisture, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) were evaluated. Also, the ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) and germination index (GI) were measured in during process to evaluate compost maturity. The results of this study showed that the C/Ns decreased to about 63.37%, 59.6% and 46% for bioreactors B, A and control, respectively. Also maximum GI and temperature reached to about 138% and 59 °C in reactor B. Furthermore, our results showed that inoculation with this microorganism reduces process time to 18 days that is better than the results of other researchers and thus results in cost savings. However, we think, Aspergillus niger is appropriate candidate for compost production as a model.
KeywordsCompost Inoculation Aspergillus Niger Bioreactor Municipal solid waste
This research work was financially supported by Babol Noshirvani University of Technology through grant program No.BNUT/370342/97.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 15ed: APHA American Public Health Association; 1981.Google Scholar
- 2.ASTM. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. American Society for Testing and Materials West. PA, USA: Conshohocken; 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.CCQC, C. Compost maturity index, California compost quality council Nevada. California: City; 2001.Google Scholar
- 10.Hart TD, De Leij FAAM, Kinsey G, Kelley J, Lynch JM. Strategies for the isolation of cellulolytic fungi for composting of wheat straw. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;18:471–80.Google Scholar
- 11.ISIRI13320, I.o.S.a.I.R.o.I. 2007. Compost-Physycal and chemical specification ISIRI 13320.Google Scholar
- 14.Ke GR, Lai CM, Liu YY, Yang SS. Inoculation of food waste with the thermo-tolerant lipolytic actinomycete Thermoactinomyces vulgaris A31 and maturity evaluation of the compost. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(19):7424–31.Google Scholar
- 22.Wei Z, Xi B, Zhao Y, Wang S, Liu H, Jiang Y. Effect of inoculating microbes in municipal solid waste composting on characteristics of humic acid. Chemosphere. 2007;68(2):368–74.Google Scholar
- 24.Woodford, P.B. 2009. In-vessel composting model with multiple substrate and microorganism types, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
- 26.Zhang J, Zeng G, Chen Y, Yu M, Huang H, Fan C, Zhu Y, Li H, Liu Z, Chen M, Jiang M. Impact of Phanerochaete chrysosporium inoculation on indigenous bacterial communities during agricultural waste composting. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(7):3159–69.Google Scholar