Advertisement

Comparative investigation of argon and argon/oxygen plasma performance for Perchloroethylene (PCE) removal from aqueous solution: optimization and kinetic study

  • Mostafa Karimaei
  • Babak Shokri
  • Mohammad Reza Khani
  • Kamyar Yaghmaeian
  • Alireza Mesdaghinia
  • Ramin Nabizadeh
  • Amir Hossein Mahvi
  • Shahrokh Nazmara
Research Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is evaluation of the perchloroethylene degradation from aqueous solutions by non-thermal plasma produced in dielectric barrier discharge reactor in two different scenarios: first plasma generated with 225 cc/min mixture of oxygen and argon flow (12% gas ratio of O2/Ar), and in the second scenario plasma generated with 225 cc/min of pure argon gas.

Methods

Design studies were performed using response surface methodology and central composite design. All experiments with the selected levels of independent parameters including the initial concentration of perchloroethylene (5–100 mg/L), voltage (20–5 kv) and contact time (15–180 s) was implemented, and 29 tests were proposed by using response surface methodology and central composite design was performed in two experimental scenarios.

Results

Results showed that the Pseudo first-order kinetics coefficient of perchloroethylene degradation in the mixture of oxygen and argon and pure argon scenario under the optimum conditions were 0.024 and 0.016 S−1 respectively. Results conveyed that in order to achieve the highest removal efficiency (100%), the values of contact time, perchloroethylene concentration and voltage variables were predicted 169.55 s, 74.3 mg/l, 18.86 kv respectively in mixture of oxygen and argon scenario and also were predicted 203 s, 85.22 mg/l, 20.39 kv respectively in pure argon scenario.

Conclusions

In the recent study dielectric barrier discharge was an efficient method for perchloroethylene removal with both oxygen an argon mixture and pure argon as input gas. Both input voltage and reaction time has positive effect on perchloroethylene removal; but initial perchloroethylene concentration has negative effect on perchloroethylene removal. Comparison of two plasma scenarios with different input gas shown that plasma generated by mixture of oxygen and argon gas was more powerful and had higher removal efficiency and degradation kinetics than the plasma generated by pure argon gas.

Keywords

PCE Non thermal plasma Dielectric barrier discharge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Center for Water Quality Research (CWQR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER) and Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran, for financially supporting this project (project no 95-01-46-32189).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Kwon T-S, Lee JY, Yang JS, Baek K. One-dimensional column and three-dimensional box flushing of silicone emulsion-enhanced remediation for chlorinated solvent contaminated soils. Korean J Chem Eng. 2017;34(3):741–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee B-D. A comparison of the experiment results and the radical degradation pathways in PCE through atomic charge calculation. 韓國油化學會誌. 2016;33(3):492–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faraji M, Amin M, Sadani M. Survey on possibility of biodegradation of Perchloroethylene (PCE) in high concentration using anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR). Tolooebehdasht. 2013;11(4):70–80.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadeghi M, Naddafi K, and Nabizadeh R. Toxicity assessment of Perchloroethylene and intermediate products after advanced oxidation process by Daphnia magna bioassay. 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maleki A, et al. Degradation and toxicity reduction of phenol by ultrasound waves. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop. 2007;21(1):33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherlach KS, Gorka AP, Dantzler A, Roepe PD. Quantification of perchloroethylene residues in dry-cleaned fabrics. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;30(11):2481–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayes RB. Dry cleaning, some chlorinated solvents and other industrial chemicals IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 63. Cancer Causes Control. 1996;7(2):289–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doherty RE. A history of the production and use of carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene and 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane in the United States: part 1--historical background; carbon tetrachloride and tetrachloroethylene. Environ Forensic. 2000;1(2):69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenner-Crisp P. OPPT trichloroethylene (TCE) draft risk assessment final comments of 9 member peer review panel. 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janulewicz PA, White RF, Winter MR, Weinberg JM, Gallagher LE, Vieira V, et al. Risk of learning and behavioral disorders following prenatal and early postnatal exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2008;30(3):175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salahudeen AK. Perchloroethylene-induced nephrotoxicity in dry-cleaning workers: is there a role for free radicals? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(5):1122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monosson E. TCE contamination of groundwater. Encyclopedia of Earth, 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vieira V, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D. Impact of tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water on the risk of breast cancer: using a dose model to assess exposure in a case-control study. Environ Health. 2005;4(1):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lynge E, Andersen A, Rylander L, Tinnerberg H, Lindbohm ML, Pukkala E, et al. Cancer in persons working in dry cleaning in the Nordic countries. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(2):213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim H-S, Lee WS, Ahn CY, Kim BH, Kim JE, Oh HM. Kinetic correlation between degradation and dechlorination of perchloroethylene in the Fenton reaction. Korean J Chem Eng. 2010;27(6):1750–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jafari AJ, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of aniline in aqueous solution using Zno nanoparticles. Environ Eng Manag J. 2016; 15(1).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maleki A, Mahvi AH, Ebrahimi R, Zandsalimi Y. Study of photochemical and sonochemical processes efficiency for degradation of dyes in aqueous solution. Korean J Chem Eng. 2010;27(6):1805–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daghrir R, Drogui P. Tetracycline antibiotics in the environment: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2013;11(3):209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmadimoghaddam M, et al. Degradation of 2,4-dinitrophenol by photo Fenton process. Asian J Chem. 2010;22(2):1009–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baziar M, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen/nZVI/persulfate process on the elimination of 4-chlorophenol from aqueous solution: modeling and optimization study. Korean J Chem Eng. 2018:1–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magureanu M, Piroi D, Gherendi F, Mandache NB, Parvulescu V. Decomposition of methylene blue in water by corona discharges. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2008;28(6):677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun B, Sato M, Clements J. Oxidative processes occurring when pulsed high voltage discharges degrade phenol in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol. 2000;34(3):509–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao J, Ma C, Xing S, Sun L, Liu J. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions of non-road diesel engine treated with non-thermal plasma technology. Korean J Chem Eng. 2016;33(12):3425–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang X, Zhou M, Jin X. Application of glow discharge plasma for wastewater treatment. Electrochim Acta. 2012;83:501–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lukes P, Appleton AT, Locke BR. Hydrogen peroxide and ozone formation in hybrid gas-liquid electrical discharge reactors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2004;40(1):60–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanazawa S, Kawano H, Watanabe S, Furuki T, Akamine S, Ichiki R, et al. Observation of OH radicals produced by pulsed discharges on the surface of a liquid. Plasma Sources Sci Technol. 2011;20(3):034010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marotta E, Schiorlin M, Ren X, Rea M, Paradisi C. Advanced oxidation process for degradation of aqueous phenol in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Plasma Process Polym. 2011;8(9):867–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shishoo R. Plasma technologies for textiles. 2007: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Friedrich J. The plasma chemistry of polymer surfaces: advanced techniques for surface design. 2012: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moreau M, Orange N, Feuilloley M. Non-thermal plasma technologies: new tools for bio-decontamination. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(6):610–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Seyedsalehi M, Yaghmaeian K, Nabizadeh R, Alimohammadi M, et al. Degradation kinetics of tetracycline in aqueous solutions using peroxydisulfate activated by ultrasound irradiation: effect of radical scavenger and water matrix. J Mol Liq. 2017;241:704–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reddy PMK, et al. Degradation and mineralization of methylene blue by dielectric barrier discharge non-thermal plasma reactor. Chem Eng J. 2013;217:41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jiang B, Zheng J, Qiu S, Wu M, Zhang Q, Yan Z, et al. Review on electrical discharge plasma technology for wastewater remediation. Chem Eng J. 2014;236:348–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Magureanu M, Piroi D, Mandache NB, David V, Medvedovici A, Parvulescu VI. Degradation of pharmaceutical compound pentoxifylline in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2010;44(11):3445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tichonovas M, Krugly E, Racys V, Hippler R, Kauneliene V, Stasiulaitiene I, et al. Degradation of various textile dyes as wastewater pollutants under dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment. Chem Eng J. 2013;229:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang K-C, Hoag GE, Chheda P, Woody BA, Dobbs GM. Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of tetrachloroethylene with permanganate. Chemosphere. 2002;46(6):815–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aieta EM, Reagan KM, Lang JS, McReynolds L, Kang JW, Glaze WH. Advanced oxidation processes for treating groundwater contaminated with TCE and PCE: pilot-scale evaluations. J-Am Water Works Assoc. 1988;80(5):64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glaze WH, Kang JW. Advanced oxidation processes for treating groundwater contaminated with TCE and PCE: laboratory studies. J-Am Water Works Assoc. 1988;80(5):57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Miao Z, Gu X, Lu S, Zang X, Wu X, Xu M, et al. Perchloroethylene (PCE) oxidation by percarbonate in Fe2+−catalyzed aqueous solution: PCE performance and its removal mechanism. Chemosphere. 2015;119:1120–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dobaradaran S, Lutze H, Mahvi A, Schmidt TC. Transformation efficiency and formation of transformation products during photochemical degradation of TCE and PCE at micromolar concentrations. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12(1):16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mostafa Karimaei
    • 1
  • Babak Shokri
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mohammad Reza Khani
    • 2
  • Kamyar Yaghmaeian
    • 1
    • 4
  • Alireza Mesdaghinia
    • 1
  • Ramin Nabizadeh
    • 1
  • Amir Hossein Mahvi
    • 1
    • 5
  • Shahrokh Nazmara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Laser and Plasma Research InstituteShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIslamic Republic of Iran
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIslamic Republic of Iran
  4. 4.Center for Water Quality Research (CWQR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER)Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  5. 5.Center for Solid Waste Research, Institute for Environmental ResearchTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations