Advertisement

Simultaneous immobilization of heavy metals in soil environment by pulp and paper derived nanoporous biochars

  • Hoda Arabyarmohammadi
  • Ahmad Khodadadi Darban
  • Mahmoud Abdollahy
  • Bita Ayati
Research Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Biochars are the new generation of sustainable soil amendments which may be applied both to fertilize and remediate the impacted soils. The aim of current research has been synthesis and characterization of pulp and paper-derived biochars and determination of their mechanisms in simultaneous immobilization of heavy metals (Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+) within contaminated soil. In a novel attempt, three different solid wastes of Mazandaran Wood and Paper Industries (barks and effluent sludge) were utilized to produce biochars.

Methods

The thermogravimetric behavior of the three selected biomasses were initially analyzed and the proper pyrolysis condition has been determined, accordingly. Alterations in surface active groups, before and after the pyrolysis process, have been detected by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Elemental analysis and acid digestion procedure have been employed to measure C, H, N, S, O, and P contents of the biochars. Moreover, porosity and morphological characteristics have been monitored by Brauner-Emmet-Teller (BET) porosimetry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Batch adsorption tests have been designed and carried out. Finally, a set of soil sequential extraction experiments was performed over both amended/unamended soils which together with a post-sorption FTIR analysis, explained the possible competitive immobilization mechanism.

Results

Porosimetry study indicated the nanoporosity of the chars and the distribution pattern of adsorbed metals over the char samples. Batch sorption tests suggested remarkable uptake capacity for each char. The results of post sorption tests suggested that Cu is mainly involved in organic bonds of -NH2, -OH and -COOH groups, Pb forms insoluble hydroxide, phosphate or carbonate precipitates, and Zn is mostly engaged in the residual fraction.

Conclusions

Accordingly, the bulky wastes are confirmed to have the potential to form sustainable biochar soil amendments.

Keywords

Biochar Heavy metals Immobilization Pulp and paper Soil 

Abbreviations

AAS

atomic Absorption Spectrometry

BJH

Barrett-Joyner-Halenda

MP

Micropore

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Mazandaran Wood and Paper industries for their kind cooperation in supply of feedstock materials during this project.

Authors’ contributions

HA was the main investigator, prepared the samples and performed the analyses, AKD supervised the study. MA and BA were the advisors to the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The research was financially supported by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), Iranian Mines and Mining Industries Development and Renovation Organization (IMIDRO), Iran Mineral Processing Research Center (IMPRC), and Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC).

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Bajpai P (2015) Management of Pulp and Paper Mill Waste. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11788-1.
  2. 2.
    Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag. 2009;29:293–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gavrilescu D. Energy from biomass in pulp and paper mills. Environ Eng Manag J. 2008;7:537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arabyarmohammadi H, Salarirad MM, Behnamfard A. Characterization and utilization of clay-based construction and demolition wastes as adsorbents for zinc (II) removal from aqueous solutions: an equilibrium and kinetic study. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2014;33:777–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.11833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ali I. Water treatment by adsorption columns: evaluation at ground level. Sep Purif Rev. 2014;43:175–205.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2012.748671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lehmann DJ, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Thies JE, et al. Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem. 2006;37:1477–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.06.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Wang H, He L, et al. Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013;20:8472–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1659-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - a review. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;35:219–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karbassi S, Nasrabadi T, Shahriari T. Metallic pollution of soil in the vicinity of National Iranian Lead and zinc (NILZ) company. Environ Earth Sci. 2016;75:1433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6244-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghaderian SM, Ghotbi Ravandi AA. Accumulation of copper and other heavy metals by plants growing on Sarcheshmeh copper mining area, Iran. J Geochem Explor. 2012;123:25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.06.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rastmanesh F, Moore F, Kharrati Kopaei M, et al. Heavy metal enrichment of soil in Sarcheshmeh copper complex, Kerman, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 2010;62:329–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0526-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bian R, Joseph S, Cui L, et al. A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. J Hazard Mater. 2014;272:121–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti a. (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83:1262–1267. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.053.
  15. 15.
    Chaukura N, Murimba EC, Gwenzi W. Synthesis, characterisation and methyl orange adsorption capacity of ferric oxide–biochar nano-composites derived from pulp and paper sludge. Appl Water Sci. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0392-5.
  16. 16.
    Pečkytė J, Baltrėnaitė E (2015) Assessment of heavy metals leaching from ( bio ) char obtained from industrial sewage sludge. 0:Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Devi P, Saroha AK. Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity of heavy metals. Bioresour Technol. 2014;162:308–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil. 2010;327:235–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Darban AK, Arabyarmohammadi H, Abdollahy M, Ayati B (2016) The Role of Nanoporous Biochars Functional Groups for Immobilization of Heavy Metals<sup> </sup>in Aqueous Solution. Mater Sci Forum 860:43–46. doi:  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.860.43.
  20. 20.
    Arabyarmohammadi H, Darban AK, Abdollahy M, et al. Utilization of a novel chitosan/clay/Biochar Nanobiocomposite for immobilization of heavy metals in acid soil environment. J Polym Environ. 2017:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1102-6.
  21. 21.
    Sposito G, Lund LJ, Chang AC. Trace metal chemistry in arid-zone field soils amended with sewage sludge: I. Fractionation of Ni, cu, Zn, cd, and Pb in solid Phases1. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1982;46:260.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600020009x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurth EF. The chemical composition of barks. Chem Rev. 1947;40:33–49.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60125a003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K a S. Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manage. 2010;1:289–303.  https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knicker H, Hilscher A, González-Vila FJ, Almendros G. A new conceptual model for the structural properties of char produced during vegetation fires. Org Geochem. 2008;39:935–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knicker H. How does fire affect the nature and stability of soil organic nitrogen and carbon? A review. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:91–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-007-9104-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elmquist M, Cornelissen G, Kukulska Z, Gustafsson Ö (2006) Distinct oxidative stabilities of char versus soot black carbon: Implications for quantification and environmental recalcitrance. Global Biogeochem Cycles 20:n/a-n/a.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002629.
  27. 27.
    Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: D.L. Sparks, A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke RHL (ed) Methods soil anal. Part 3—chemical methods. pp 869–919.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olsen, S. R. LAD (1965) Phosphorus. In: Norman AG (ed) Methods soil Anal pp 1035–1049.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, et al. Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:644–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bower CA, Reitemeier RF. Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci. 1952;73:251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang W, Huang H, Tan F, et al. Influence of EDTA washing on the species and mobility of heavy metals residual in soils. J Hazard Mater. 2010;173:369–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsang DCW, Zhang W, Lo IMC. Copper extraction effectiveness and soil dissolution issues of EDTA-flushing of artificially contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2007;68:234–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van HED, Utomo S, Zandvoort MH, L Lens PN. Comparison of three sequential extraction procedures to describe metal fractionation in anaerobic granular sludges. Talanta. 2005;65:549–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.07.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mayer ZA, Eltom Y, Stennett D, et al. Characterization of engineered biochar for soil management. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2014;33:490–6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.11788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, et al. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel. 2007;86:1781–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, et al. Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:6613–21.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6613-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu X, Li Z, Zhang Y, et al. Characterization of human manure-derived biochar and energy-balance analysis of slow pyrolysis process. Waste Manag. 2014;34:1619–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nguyen BT, Lehmann J. Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes. Org Geochem. 2009;40:846–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Budai, A., Zimmerman, A., Cowie, A., Webber, J., Singh, B., Glaser, B., Masiello, C., Anderson, D., Shield, F., Lehmann J (2013) Biochar Carbon Stability Test Method: An assessment of methods to determine biochar carbon stability.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K. Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag. 2015;36:256–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee JW, Kidder M, Evans BR, et al. Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:7970–4.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101337x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR. Adsorption and transport of methane in biochars derived from waste wood. Waste Manag. 2015;43:218–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Megharaj M, et al. The influence of biochar and black carbon on reduction and bioavailability of chromate in soils. J Environ Qual. 2012;41:1175–84.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Thomas Klasson K, et al. Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:5538–44.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9044217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W. Dairy-manure derived Biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:3285–91.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es803092k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lu H, Zhang W, Yang Y, et al. Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Res. 2012;46:854–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Park J-H, Ok YS, Kim S-H, et al. Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto sesame straw biochar in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere. 2016;142:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Das DD, Schnitzer MI, Monreal CM, Mayer P. Chemical composition of acid-base fractions separated from biooil derived by fast pyrolysis of chicken manure. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:6524–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L. Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by Biochars of pine needles with different Pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5137–43.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es8002684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    He Z, Mao J, Honeycutt CW, et al. Characterization of plant-derived water extractable organic matter by multiple spectroscopic techniques. Biol Fertil Soils. 2009;45:609–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0369-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    He Z, Ohno T, Cade-Menun BJ, et al. Spectral and chemical characterization of phosphates associated with humic substances. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2006;70:1741.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoda Arabyarmohammadi
    • 1
  • Ahmad Khodadadi Darban
    • 1
  • Mahmoud Abdollahy
    • 2
  • Bita Ayati
    • 2
  1. 1.Mineral Processing Group, Mining Engineering DepartmentTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations