Removal of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid from water and organic by-product minimization by catalytic ozonation
- 7 Downloads
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-DCPA acid) is a toxic herbicide. Earlier studies to remove 2,4-DCPA acid from water used expensive and/or toxic reagents, resulting in the formation of toxic organic by-products (Org-BPs). This study evaluates the removal of 2,4-DCPA acid from aqueous media using uncatalysed and catalytic ozonation with Fe doped with Ni and Co respectively.
Mixed metal oxides of Ni and Co loaded on Fe respectively, prepared by co-precipitation and physical mixing were used as catalyst for ozone facilitated oxidation degradation of 2,4-DCPA acid. Their surface properties were determined by employing SEM, BET and NH3-TPD. HPLC, IC and TOC data were used for quantifying substrate and oxidation products.
Conversion of 2,4-DCPA acid increased from 38% in acidic water to 73% in basic water, however, only 26% of the total carbon was removed and 9.5% in the form of Org-BPs. With 7:3 Fe:Ni (Co-ppt) catalyst (surface area 253 m2 g−1; particle size 236 nm), 97% of pollutant was converted. Most importantly, 92% of carbon was removed and Org-BP formation was minimized to 1.5%. With 7:3 Fe:Ni (Mixed) catalyst (surface area 12 m2 g−1; particle size 1274 nm), 68% of 2,4-DCPA acid was converted, while 23% of TOC was removed, however, 66% of Org-BP’s still remained.
In uncatalysed ozonation degradation of 2,4-DCPA acid improved with the increase in hydroxide ion concentration. Ozonation in presence of 7:3 Fe:Ni (Co-ppt) catalyst resulted in highest activity for dechlorination, TOC removal and Org-BP minimization, thus improving the quality of contaminated water.
KeywordsCatalytic ozonation 7:3 Fe:Ni (co-ppt) Total organic carbon Organic by-products
The authors are thankful for the financial support from Mangosuthu University of Technology, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal and the National Research Foundation for successful completion of this invaluable work.
ANG conducted all the lab analysis and drafted this manuscript. All authors contributed to the review and finalization of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
- 2.Rahnama-Moghadam S, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Chapter 3 - environmental toxins and the heart A2 - Ramachandran, Meenakshisundaram, in Heart and toxins. Boston: Academic Press; 2015. p. 75–132.Google Scholar
- 9.Soni KC, Shekar SC. Catalytic oxidation of bis (2-chloroethyl) ether on vanadia titania nanocatalyst. Arab J Chem. 2017:1–11.Google Scholar
- 12.Rakness K, Gordon G, Langlais B, Masschelein W, Matsumoto N, Richard Y, et al. Guideline for measurement of ozone concentration in the process gas from an ozone generator. Ozone: science. Engineering. 1996;18(3):209–29.Google Scholar
- 15.Gottschalk C, Libra JA, Saupe A. Ozonation of water and wastewater. In: Wiley-VCH; 2000.Google Scholar
- 22.Wang Y, Xie Y, Sun H, Xiao J, Cao H, Wang S. 2D/2D nano-hybrids of γ-MnO2 on reduced graphene oxide for catalytic ozonation and coupling peroxymonosulfate activation. J Hazard Mater. 2016;301:6–64.Google Scholar