Advertisement

Numerical simulation of slag forming process during submerged arc welding using DEM-ISPH hybrid method

  • Hisaya Komen
  • Masaya Shigeta
  • Manabu Tanaka
  • Mitsuyoshi Nakatani
  • Yohei Abe
Research Paper

Abstract

The hybrid method using a discrete element method (DEM) and an incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (ISPH) method was developed to clarify the slag formation process during submerged arc welding. As a result, the weld pool formation and the slag formation processes were simulated simultaneously using the hybrid method. Moreover, the edge of the slag obtained by the simulation was thinner and the center of it was thicker, which were same tendency of actual slag. The maximum thickness of the slag near the weld line was equivalent to about 2.5 mm. Although the slag thickness obtained from the computation was a little thinner than the experiment, it supported the validity of this hybrid model. Thereafter, the ensemble average processing was carried out to discuss about the velocity field of a weld pool. The averaged result showed that velocity field of a weld pool was synchronized periodically with the transportation of a molten metal droplet.

Keywords

Submerged arc welding Flux Slag Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method Discrete element method 

References

  1. 1.
    Reisgen U, Schäfer J, Willms K (2016) Analysis of the submerged arc in comparison between a pulsed and non-pulsed process. Weld World 60(4):703–711.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-016-0336-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gött G, Gericke A, Henkel KM, Uhrlandt D (2016) Optical and spectroscopic study of a submerged arc welding cavern. Weld J 95(12):491–499Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho DW, Song WH, Cho MH, Na SJ (2013) Analysis of submerged arc welding process by three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations. J Mater Process Technol 213:2278–2291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Komen H, Matsui S, Konishi K, Shigeta M, Tanaka M, Kamo K (2017) Modeling of submerged arc welding phenomena and experimental study of the heat source characteristics. Q J Japan Weld Soc 35(2):93–101 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws.35.93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanaka M, Shigeta M, Miyasaka F Kasano K (2015) A simplified numerical model of submerged arc welding. 68th IIW Annual Assembly and International Conference, Doc. 212-1376-15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh B, Khan ZA, Siddiquee AN (2013) Review on effect of flux composition on its behavior and bead geometry in submerged arc welding (SAW). J Mechanical Eng Res 5(7):123–127.  https://doi.org/10.5897/JMER2013.0284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Gèotechnique 29(1):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Komen H, Shigeta M, Tanaka M (2018) Numerical simulation of molten metal droplet transfer and weld pool convection during gas metal arc welding using incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Int J Heat Mass Transf 121:978–985.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.01.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koshizuka S, Oka Y (1996) Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid. Nucl Sci Eng 123(3):421–434.  https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito M (2015) Numerical simulation of flow phenomena in arc welding process by incompressible SPH method. Tohoku University, Sendai, Ph. D. thesis (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shigeta M, Watanabe T, Fukunishi Y (2009) Incompressible SPH simulation of double-diffusive convection phenomena. Int J Emerg Multidisciplinary Fluid Sci 1(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8315.1.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vargas WL, McCarthy JJ (2002) Conductivity of granular media with stagnant interstitial fluids via thermal particle dynamics simulation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:4847–4856.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(02)00175-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haidor J (1998) A theoretical model for gas metal arc welding and gas tungsten arc welding. I. J Appl Phys 84(7):3518–3529.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogino Y, Hirata Y, Asai S (2017) Numerical simulation of metal transfer in pulsed-MIG welding. Weld World 61(6):1289–1296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0492-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terashima H, Nishiyama N, Tsuboi J (1977) Influence of slag basicity on deoxidation in submerged-arc welding -deoxidation in submerged-arc welding (report 1). J Japan Weld Soc 46(3):165–171 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws1943.46.3_165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamamoto T, Yamazaki Y, Tsuji Y, Miyasaka F, Ohji T (2005) Simulation software of MAG arc welding for butt joint. Q J Japan Weld Soc 23(1):71–76 (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2207/qjjws.23.71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joining and Welding Research InstituteOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Hitachi Zosen CorporationOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations