Advertisement

Welding in the World

, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp 973–984 | Cite as

Influence of helium content on a ternary-gas-shielded GMAW process

  • Xiaoyu Cai
  • Sanbao Lin
  • Anthony B. Murphy
  • Bolun Dong
  • Chenglei Fan
  • Chunli Yang
Research Paper

Abstract

Helium was added to the shielding gas for mild-steel gas metal arc welding. The influence of helium content in a ternary shielding gas (Ar–CO2–He) mixture on arc properties, metal transfer process, and weld bead profile was investigated by numerical simulation and experimental study. As the helium content increases, the arc temperature field becomes more constricted but the central high-temperature zone expands. The current density on the arc axis increases with increasing helium content. The heat flux density on the cathode increases as the helium content increases. The changes in the arc properties lead to the changes in the metal transfer. With increasing helium content, the droplet size increases and the transfer frequency decreases, with approximately linear dependence on helium content. When the helium content is increased from 0 to 25 vol%, the droplet diameter increases by about 80% and the transfer frequency decreases by about 77%, compared to the zero-helium case; this is attributed to changes in the forces on the detaching droplets. With the addition of helium, the base metal fusion area increases and has a more rounded profile; this is attributed to the increased droplet diameter and decreased droplet frequency.

Keywords

GMA welding Helium Shielding gas 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51775139] and the National Key Technology R&D Program [grant number 2015BAF01B00].

References

  1. 1.
    Lowke JJ, Morrow R, Haidar J, Murphy AB (1997) Prediction of gas tungsten arc welding properties in mixtures of hydrogen. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 25:925–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang HY (2008) Effects of shielding gas composition and activating flux on GTAW weldments. Mater Des 30:2404–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanaka M, Tashiro S, Satoh T, Murphy AB, Lowke JJ (2008) Influence of shielding gas composition on arc properties in TIG welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 13:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zähr J, Füssel U, Hertel M, Lohse M, Sende M, Schnick M (2012) Numerical and experimental studies of the influence of process gases in TIG welding. Weld World 56:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urmston SA (1985) Effect of shielding gas composition on transfer and fusion characteristics in P-GMAW of carbon steels. Ph.D. dissertation. Cranfield: Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson TS, Rothwell AB, Dorling DV (1988) The influence of shielding gas composition on pulsed gas metal arc welding of arctic and offshore structures and pipelines. Nova Corporation of Alberta and the Metals Technology Labroatoris, Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Energy Mines and Resources, Canada Report no. 13090Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao ZH, Hu J, Liao SM, Tsai HL (2010) Modeling of the transport phenomena in GMAW using argon-helium mixtures. Part II—the metal. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:5722–5732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haidar J, Lowke JJ (2007) Effects of CO2 shielding gas on metal droplet formation in arc welding. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 25:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang LL, Hu FG, Wang HP, Murphy AB, Tang XH (2014) Effects of shielding gas composition on arc profile and molten pool dynamics in gas metal arc welding of steels. J Phys D Appl Phys 47:465202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jönsson PG, Eagar TW, Szekely J (1995) Heat and metal transfer in gas metal arc welding using argon and helium. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 26:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee JH, Cho YT, Na SJ (2002) A numerical analysis of a gas-tungsten arc welding considering the current density and temperature distribution on the electrode surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng 216:1115–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy AB, Arundell CJ (1994) Transport coefficients of argon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon-nitrogen and argon-oxygen plasmas. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 14:451–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murphy AB (1995) Transport coefficients of air, argon-air, nitrogen-air, and oxygen-air plasmas. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 15:279–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy AB (1997) Transport coefficients of helium and argon–helium plasmas. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 25:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murphy AB, Tam E (2014) Thermodynamic properties and transport coefficients of arc lamp plasmas: argon, krypton and xenon. J Phys D Appl Phys 47:295202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murphy AB, Tanaka M, Tashiro S, Sato T, Lowke JJ (2009) A computational investigation of the effectiveness of different shielding gas mixtures for arc welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:115205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang CL, Lin SB (2010) Arc welding basic fundamentals. Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin, pp 78–84Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li SK, Chen MA, Wu CS (2004) Analytical model for dynamic process of metal transfer in pulsed GMAW. Trans China Weld Inst 25:47–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute of Welding 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoyu Cai
    • 1
  • Sanbao Lin
    • 1
  • Anthony B. Murphy
    • 2
  • Bolun Dong
    • 1
  • Chenglei Fan
    • 1
  • Chunli Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and JoiningHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.CSIRO ManufacturingLindfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations