Advertisement

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 303–312 | Cite as

Flexibility in Cognitive Functioning: The Play of Paradox

  • Venkat Ram Reddy GanuthulaEmail author
  • Shuchi Sinha
Original Research

Abstract

Interactions among motivation, cognitive functioning, and affect shape much of the diversity in human behavior. This study aims to synthesize the literature on these interactions through a narrative review and highlights how a particular class of motivations leads to paradoxical effects. The literature review was conducted by following a rigorous search protocol to identify and filter the research on the topic. A synthesis of the pertinent research suggests that motivation, cognitive functioning, and affect interact cyclically to give rise to behavioral diversity. More importantly, affective and motivational influences lead to flexibility in cognitive functioning. This flexibility in information search and processing gives rise to paradoxical effects in the case of a class of motivations called, desires. Regulation of affect helps tone down these paradoxical effects. To conclude, few implications to theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Affect Cognitive functioning Desire Flexibility Motivation Paradox Regulation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

*Literature considered towards the narrative review

  1. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 612–630.Google Scholar
  2. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21(1), 147–160.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Positive affect and flexibility: Overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 123–134.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Writing a literature review. In M. J. Prinstein (Ed.), The portable mentor: Expert guide to a successful career in psychology (pp. 119–132). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 16–44). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bebko, G. M., Franconeri, S. L., Ochsner, K. N., & Chiao, J. Y. (2011). Look before you regulate: Differential perceptual strategies underlying expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 11(4), 732–740.Google Scholar
  7. *Benn, Y., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P., Sun, Y. H., Wilkinson, I. D., & Farrow, T. F. (2014). The neural basis of monitoring goal progress. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 688.Google Scholar
  8. *Boroditsky, I., Neville, H., Karns, C., Markman, A., & Spivey, M. (2010). Flux: Fundamental or Frivolous? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32), 2918–2925.Google Scholar
  9. *Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015). Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 83–113.Google Scholar
  10. *Bourgeois, A., Chelazzi, L., & Vuilleumier, P. (2016). How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention. Progress in Brain Research, 229, 325–342.Google Scholar
  11. *Braver, T. S., Krug, M. K., Chiew, K. S., Kool, W., Westbrook, J. A., Clement, N. J., et al. (2014). Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 443–472.Google Scholar
  12. Buckner, R. L. (2013). The brain’s default network: Origins and implications for the study of psychosis. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15(3), 351–360.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. London: Hachette UK.Google Scholar
  14. *Calcott, R. D., & Berkman, E. T. (2014). Attentional flexibility during approach and avoidance motivational states: The role of context in shifts of attentional breadth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1393–1405.Google Scholar
  15. Callan, D. E., & Schweighofer, N. (2008). Positive and negative modulation of word learning by reward anticipation. Human Brain Mapping, 29(2), 237–248.Google Scholar
  16. *Carver, C. S. (2018). Control theory, goal attainment, and psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 29(3), 139–144.Google Scholar
  17. *Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2008). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Castro-Sánchez, M., Zurita-Ortega, F., Chacón-Cuberos, R., López-Gutiérrez, C., & Zafra-Santos, E. (2018). Emotional intelligence, motivational climate and levels of anxiety in athletes from different categories of sports: Analysis through structural equations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 894–908.Google Scholar
  19. Changizi, M. A., & Hall, W. G. (2001). Thirst modulates a perception. Perception, 30(12), 1489–1502.Google Scholar
  20. Cheng, B. H., & McCarthy, J. M. (2018). Understanding the dark and bright sides of anxiety: A theory of workplace anxiety. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(5), 537–550.Google Scholar
  21. *Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Positive affect versus reward: Emotional and motivational influences on cognitive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 279–290.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, A. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2017). Implementation intentions. Prospective Memory (pp. 81–97). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. *Custers, R., Eitam, B., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Conscious and unconscious processes in goal pursuit. In H. Aarts & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. Goal-directed behavior (pp. 231–266). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. *Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2016). The mechanics of motivated reasoning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 133–147.Google Scholar
  25. *Felin, T., Koenderink, J., & Krueger, J. I. (2017). Rationality, perception, and the all-seeing eye. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1040–1059.Google Scholar
  26. *Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 242–254.Google Scholar
  27. *Fishbach, A., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2012). How feedback influences persistence, disengagement, and change in goal pursuit. In H. Aarts & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. Goal-directed behavior (pp. 203–230). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fujita, K., & MacGregor, K. E. (2012). Basic goal distinctions. In H. Aarts & A. J. Elliot (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. Goal-directed behavior (pp. 85–114). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fujiwara, T. (2016). Potential and Challenges for Start-ups in Japan’s Biotech Industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(4), 417–424.Google Scholar
  30. *Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482.Google Scholar
  31. *Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2011a). Attentional consequences of pregoal and postgoal positive affects. Emotion, 11(6), 1358–1372.Google Scholar
  32. *Gable, P. A., Browning, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2016). Affect, motivation, and cognitive scope. In T. S. Braver (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive psychology. Motivation and cognitive control (pp. 164–187). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  33. *Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2011b). Attentional consequences of pre-goal and post-goal positive affects. Emotion, 11(6), 1358–1372.Google Scholar
  34. Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The moral pop-out effect: Enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli. Cognition, 132(1), 22–36.Google Scholar
  35. Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577–591.Google Scholar
  36. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2012). Goal pursuit. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 208–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224–236.Google Scholar
  38. *Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–294.Google Scholar
  39. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.Google Scholar
  40. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 970–985.Google Scholar
  41. *Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. *Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., et al. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198–212.Google Scholar
  43. *Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 301–320.Google Scholar
  44. *Hart, W., & Gable, P. A. (2013). Motivating goal pursuit: The role of affect motivational intensity and activated goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 922–935.Google Scholar
  45. *Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Motivation and action: Introduction and overview. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2008). Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 387–402.Google Scholar
  47. Hofmann, W., Kotabe, H. P., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). Desire and desire regulation. In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 61–81). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. *Hofmann, W., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). The psychology of desire. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. *Hofmann, W., & Van Dillen, L. (2012). Desire: The new hot spot in self-control research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 317–328.Google Scholar
  50. Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. (2013). Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 310–319.Google Scholar
  51. *Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–134.Google Scholar
  52. Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190–204.Google Scholar
  53. Jena, L. K., & Memon, N. Z. (2018). Does workplace flexibility usher innovation? A moderated mediation model on the enablers of innovative workplace behavior. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, K. E., Thompson, J., Hall, J. A., & Meyer, C. (2018). Crisis (hostage) negotiators weigh in: The skills, behaviors, and qualities that characterize an expert crisis negotiator. Police Practice and Research, 19(5), 472–484.Google Scholar
  55. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932–944.Google Scholar
  57. Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 54–68.Google Scholar
  58. *Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  59. *Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.Google Scholar
  60. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93–105.Google Scholar
  61. Miele, D. B., & Scholer, A. A. (2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  62. *Moberly, N. J., & Watkins, E. R. (2009). Negative affect and ruminative self-focus during everyday goal pursuit. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 729–740.Google Scholar
  63. *Morewedge, C. K., Giblin, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2014). The (perceived) meaning of spontaneous thoughts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1742–1754.Google Scholar
  64. Mukherjee, T., & Bhal, K. T. (2011). Can we talk about emotional flexibility? Cognitive emotional regulation strategies as moderator of the relationship between emotional labor and self esteem. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(1–2), 47–58.Google Scholar
  65. O’Callaghan, C., Kveraga, K., Shine, J. M., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Bar, M. (2017). Predictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder. Consciousness and Cognition, 100(47), 63–80.Google Scholar
  66. Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Self-regulation: Principles and tools. In G. Oettingen & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The Jacobs Foundation series on adolescence. Self-regulation in adolescence (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Oettingen, G., & Reininger, K. M. (2016). The power of prospection: Mental contrasting and behavior change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 591–602.Google Scholar
  68. Ogbonnaya, C., Daniels, K., & Nielsen, K. (2017). How incentive pay affects employee engagement, satisfaction, and trust. Harvard Business Review. Google Scholar
  69. *Orehek, E., Bessarabova, E., Chen, X., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2011). Positive affect as informational feedback in goal pursuit. Motivation and Emotion, 35(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  70. *Panno, A., Lauriola, M., & Figner, B. (2013). Emotion regulation and risk taking: Predicting risky choice in deliberative decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 27(2), 326–338.Google Scholar
  71. *Papies, E. K., Pronk, T. M., Keesman, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). The benefits of simply observing: Mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 148–155.Google Scholar
  72. Piansoongnern, O. (2016). Chinese leadership and its impacts on innovative work behavior of the Thai employees. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  73. *Picó-Pérez, M., Radua, J., Steward, T., Menchón, J. M., & Soriano-Mas, C. (2017). Emotion regulation in mood and anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of fMRI cognitive reappraisal studies. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 79, 96–110.Google Scholar
  74. *Ryan, R. M. (Ed.). (2012). Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–155.Google Scholar
  76. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770.Google Scholar
  77. *Staudinger, M. R., Erk, S., Abler, B., & Walter, H. (2009). Cognitive reappraisal modulates expected value and prediction error encoding in the ventral striatum. Neuroimage, 47(2), 713–725.Google Scholar
  78. *Suri, G., Shine, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2018). Why do we do what we do? The Attention–Readiness–Motivation framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(4), e12382.Google Scholar
  79. Sushil, (2017). Small steps for a giant leap: Flexible organization. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 273–282.Google Scholar
  80. *Van der Stigchel, S., Imants, P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Positive affect increases cognitive control in the antisaccade task. Brain and Cognition, 75(2), 177–181.Google Scholar
  81. van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Stroebe, W., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2011). Implementation intentions as goal primes: Boosting self-control in tempting environments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 551–565.Google Scholar
  82. von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–492.Google Scholar
  1. Yee, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2018). Interactions of motivation and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 83–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations