Advertisement

Modelling the Enablers of Workforce Agility in IoT Projects: A TISM Approach

  • Madhukar Patil
  • M. SureshEmail author
Original Research
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

IoT projects can be categorized as high technology with an extremely dynamic product development lifecycle. To be a leader under such conditions, organizations need to focus priorities on achieving shorter product development cycle along with organization agility and workforce agility. Many researchers have tried to identify the enablers that affect workforce agility in different segments, but none has really looked into the IoT project environment. In this paper, efforts are taken to model the enablers of workforce agility in IoT projects and to understand the interrelationship among enablers using total interpretive structural modelling. The current study makes an attempt to provide a hierarchical structure representing the driving enablers and the dependent enablers and to give the order of enablers with respect to influence on workforce agility. Results indicate that employee proactivity, innovativeness, resiliency skills and ownership or self-motivation bring agility in the workforce. These enablers help employees to act in all decision-making situations to achieve IoT organization goals faster.

Keywords

Agility Internet of Things projects Project agility Total interpretive structural modelling Workforce agility 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

We declare we do not have any conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, P., Conboy, K., & Wang, X. (2009). ‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile systems development research. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 281–284.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, U., Mangla, A., & Sagar, M. (2016). Company-cause-customer: Interaction architecture. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 307–319.Google Scholar
  3. Bag, S. (2017). Identification of green procurement drivers and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling. The Journal of Business Perspective, 17(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
  4. Balaji, M., & Arshinder, K. (2016). Modeling the causes of food wastage in Indian perishable food supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 114, 153–167.Google Scholar
  5. Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M., & Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce agility: The new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
  6. Dubey, R., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
  7. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T., & Wamba, S. F. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management: Framework and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
  8. Dyer, L., & Ericksen, J. (2006). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace agility through workforce scalability. CAHRS Working Paper Series, 06-12.Google Scholar
  9. Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. A. (1998). From human resource strategy to organizational effectiveness: Lessons from research on organizational agility. CAHRS working paper series, 125.Google Scholar
  10. Dyer, L., & Shafer, R. A. (2003). Dynamic organizations: Achieving marketplace and organizational agility with people. CAHRS working paper series, 27.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 65–73.Google Scholar
  12. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.Google Scholar
  13. Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework. International Journal of Production Research, 36(5), 1223–1247.Google Scholar
  14. Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 87–105.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, V., Kapur, P. K., & Kumar, D. (2016). Modelling and measuring code smells in enterprise applications using TISM and two-way assessment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 7(3), 332–340.Google Scholar
  16. Hosein, Z. Z. (2012). The role of emotional intelligence on workforce agility in the workplace. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3), 48.Google Scholar
  17. Isenberg, M.-A., Werthmann, D., Morales-Kluge, E., & Scholz-Reiter, B. (2011). The role of the Internet of Things for increased autonomy and agility in collaborative production environments. In Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., & Michahelles, F. (Eds.) Architecturing the internet of things (pp. 195–228). Berlin: Springer. ISBN: 9783642191572.Google Scholar
  18. Jayalakshmi, B., & Pramod, V. R. (2015). Total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 63–85.Google Scholar
  19. Khatwani, G., Singh, S. P., Trivedi, A., & Chauhan, A. (2015). Fuzzy-TISM: A fuzzy extension of TISM for group decision making. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  20. Kisielnicki, J. (2014). Project management in research and development. Foundations of Management, 6(3), 57–70.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.Google Scholar
  22. Luo, Z., Dubey, R., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Explaining environmental sustainability in supply chains using graph theory. Computational Economics, 52(4), 1257–1275.Google Scholar
  23. Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52–59.Google Scholar
  24. Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014). Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 113–130.Google Scholar
  25. McCann, J., & Selsky, J. W. (2012). Mastering turbulence: The essential capabilities of agile and resilient individuals, teams and organizations. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Miragliotta, G., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2012). Internet of Things: Smart present or smart future. Politecnico di Milano, Italy: Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering.Google Scholar
  27. Muduli, A. (2013). Workforce agility: A review of literature. IUP Journal of Management Research, 12(3), 55.Google Scholar
  28. Patri, R., & Suresh, M. (2017). Modelling the enablers of agile performance in healthcare organization: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 251–272.Google Scholar
  29. Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  30. Prasad, U. C., & Suri, R. K. (2011). Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 12(3–4), 31–39.Google Scholar
  31. Qin, R., & Nembhard, D. A. (2015). Workforce agility in operations management. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 20(2), 55–69.Google Scholar
  32. Rajesh, R. (2017). Technological capabilities and supply chain resilience of firms: A relational analysis using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 161–169.Google Scholar
  33. Ren, J., Yusuf, Y. Y., & Burns, N. D. (2003). The effects of agile attributes on competitive priorities: A neural network approach. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(6), 489–497.Google Scholar
  34. Sagar, M., Bora, S., Gangwal, A., Gupta, P., Kumar, A., & Agarwal, A. (2013). Factors affecting customer loyalty in cloud computing: A customer defection-centric view to develop a void-in-customer loyalty amplification model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(3), 143–156.Google Scholar
  35. Sandeepa, S., & Chand, M. (2018). Analysis of flexibility factors in sustainable supply chain using Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (T-ISM) technique. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 6(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  36. Sehgal, V., Sagar, M., & Shankar, R. (2016). Modelling of key success factors for mobile virtual network operators in Indian telecommunication market. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1314–1338.Google Scholar
  37. Shafer, R. A., Dyer, L., Kilty, J., Amos, J., & Ericksen, J. (2001). Crafting a human resource strategy to foster organizational agility: A case study. Human Resource Management, 40(3), 197–211.Google Scholar
  38. Sheffield, J., & Lemétayer, J. (2013). Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 459–472.Google Scholar
  39. Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460.Google Scholar
  40. Shibin, K. T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M., & Wamba, S. F. (2016). Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modelling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 171–188.Google Scholar
  41. Sindhwani, R., & Malhotra, V. (2017). A framework to enhance agile manufacturing system: A total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 467–487.Google Scholar
  42. Singh, A. K., & Sushil, (2013). Modelling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(3), 250–275.Google Scholar
  43. Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil, (2014). Modelling drivers of adapt for effective strategy execution. The Learning Organization, 21(6), 369–391.Google Scholar
  44. Sushil, (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.Google Scholar
  45. Sushil, (2017a). Modified ISM/TISM process with simultaneous transitivity checks for reducing direct pair comparisons. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 331–351.Google Scholar
  46. Sushil, (2017b). Multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives using integrated TISM–IRP with a big data framework. Production Planning & Control, 28(11–12), 999–1010.Google Scholar
  47. Sushil, (2018a). Incorporating polarity of relationships in ISM and TISM for theory building in information and organization management. International Journal of Information Management, 43(December), 38–51.Google Scholar
  48. Sushil, (2018b). How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models? Annals of Operations Research, 270(1–2), 473–487.Google Scholar
  49. Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modelling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, 81–87.Google Scholar
  50. Worldwide IoT forecast. (2015–2020). IDC # 256397, https://www.idc.com/infographics/IoT/ATTACHMENTS/IoT.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  51. Yadav, N., & Sushil (2014). Total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of strategic performance management for Indian telecom service providers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(4), 421–445.Google Scholar
  52. Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2016). Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 321–340.Google Scholar
  53. Yadav, M., Rangnekar, S., & Bamel, U. (2016). Workplace flexibility dimensions as enablers of organizational citizenship behavior. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
  54. Yeravdekar, S., & Behl, A. (2017). Benchmarking model for management education in India: A total interpretive structural modelling approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(3), 666–693.Google Scholar
  55. Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 33–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amrita School of BusinessCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations