Advertisement

Suggesting a “Three-Ball Cycle” Theory on International Emergency Management and its Application in Korea

  • Kyoo-Man HaEmail author
Original Research
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

This study proposes a “three-ball cycle” theory to the field of international emergency management and then applies it to Korea for the ultimate goal of contributing to the expansion of emergency management principles. Here, qualitative content analysis supported by multiple perspectives and metaphors has been utilized as a major methodology. Three-ball cycle theory refers to the circulation of the (a) rugby-ball phase, (b) the soccer-ball phase, and (c) the play-ball phase. As an illustrative case, this paper analyzes the Korean emergency management principles via six major emergencies, namely fire, flood accompanied by typhoon, food contamination, cyber attack, special events like accidents or catastrophes, and suicide. The major finding is that the international community needs to utilize the three-ball cycle theory as a new emergency management principle. Accordingly, Korea should change its current practice of adhering to the one- or two-ball cycle theory and resort to implementing the three-ball cycle theory.

Keywords

Emergency management principles Major emergencies Metaphors Three-ball cycle theory Transnational emergency management 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he does not have any conflict of interests with this manuscript.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(2), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyce, J. K. (2000). Let them eat risk? Wealth, rights and disaster vulnerability. Disasters, 24(3), 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britton, N. (2002). A new emergency management for the new millennium? Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 16(4), 44–54.Google Scholar
  4. Burningham, K., Fielding, J., & Thrush, D. (2008). ‘It’ll never happen to me’: Understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters, 32(2), 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burstrom, L. (2014). Patient safety in the emergency department: Culture, waiting, and outcomes of efficiency and quality. Doctoral degree dissertation (Ph.D. in Medicine), Uppsala University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  6. Camidge, D. R., Stockton, D. L., Frame, S., Wood, R., & Bateman, D. N. (2007). Hospital administrations and deaths relating to deliberate self-harm and accidents within 5 years of a cancer diagnosis: A national study in Scotland, UK. British Journal of Cancer, 96, 752–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, C. (2005). Agencies under fire for disaster recovery plans. Eweek, (September 26), 37.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, H.-J., Lee, H.-J., & Lee, K.-W. (2005). A study on convention planning factors: Focused on special events (in Korean). Korean Journal of Convention Studies, 5(2), 155–174.Google Scholar
  9. Choi, J. J.-H., & Park, J.-S. (2010). A study on the integrated access control model to minimize data leaks in corporations (in Korean). Korean Journal of Police Administration, 38, 317–357.Google Scholar
  10. Clinton, W. J. (2006). Lessons learned from tsunami recovery: Key propositions for building back better. http://www.conflictrecovery.org/bin/Clinton-Building_Back_Better.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2018.
  11. Coleman, L. (2006). Frequency of man-made disasters in the 20th century. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Comfort, L. K. (2005). Risk, security and disaster management. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Consoli, S. M., Dantchev, N., Vergnaud, S., & Lemonge, C. (2009/2010). Consultation-liaison and emergency psychiatry. International Journal of Mental Health, 38(4), 39–55.Google Scholar
  15. Delagi, R. (2003). EMS planning for special events. FireEMS, (November/December), 59–62.Google Scholar
  16. Donahue, A. K. & Tuohy, R. V. (2006). Lessons we don’t learn: a study of the lessons of disasters, why we repeat them, and how we can learn them. Homeland Security Affairs, 2(2). https://www.hsaj.org/articles/167. Accessed 27 July, 2018.
  17. Dwyer, J. (2009). Preparing for the unthinkable. Presidency, 12(1), 38–41.Google Scholar
  18. El-Masri, S., & Tipple, G. (2002). Natural disaster, mitigation and sustainability: The case of developing countries. International Planning Studies, 7(2), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2018). Pythagoreanism. https://www.britannica.com/science/Pythagoreanism. Accessed 2 December 2018.
  20. Foropon, C., & McLachlin, R. (2013). Metaphors in operations management theory building. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(2), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gasaway, R. B. (2010). Understanding fireground command: Making decisions under stress. http://www.fireengineering.com/content/dam/fe/online-articles/documents/FEU/FEUgasaway.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2018.
  22. Gerber, S. (2004). Thunderstorms can turn into rainbows if proper planning is taken. Parks & Recreation, 53–55.Google Scholar
  23. Gnoni, M. G., & Saleh, J. H. (2017). Near-miss management systems and observability-in-depth: handling safety incidents and accident precursors in light of safety principles. Safety Science, 91, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta, V. K. (2009). Strategic framework for managing forces of continuity and change in risk management of banks in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(2), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ha, K.-M. (2017). Three-domain model for disaster management framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(4), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holt, J. (2010). Safety: Our actions must match our values. Fire Engineering, 163, 103–109.Google Scholar
  27. Hong, C.-H., & Cho, D.-H. (2008). Comparative analysis of the prerequisite items applicable to the HACCP in livestock processing plants (in Korean). Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety, 23(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
  28. Jeon, Y.-S. (2010). A study on the history and activities of public security police in Korea (in Korean). Korean Journal of Police Studies, 7, 23–45.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, A. W., & Phillips, A. (2016). Voluntary business engagement in climate change: A study of the climatewise principles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA). (2018). Homepage of KISA (in Korean). http://www.kisa.or.kr/main.jsp. Accessed 2 July 2018.
  31. Korzeniewicz, R. P., & Casullo, M. E. (2009). Responding to disaster: Two logics of demands and the politics of hybridity. Social Movement Studies, 8(2), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuzyk, R. (2007). Serving through disaster. Library Journal, 132, 26–29.Google Scholar
  33. Lambert, K. C. (2010). Critical thought for the fire service. Fire Engineering, 163, 89–96.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, H.-S., & Kwon, J.-H. (2010). The evaluation of the Korean military suicide prevention program (in Korean). The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 22(3), 653–672.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Korea Food and Drug Administration (MFDS). (2018). Homepage of MFDS (in Korean). http://www.mfds.go.kr/index.do. Accessed 24 August 2018.
  36. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). (2018). Homepage of MOHW (in Korean). http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/index.jsp. Accessed 22 July 2018.
  37. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS). (2018). Homepage of MOIS (in Korean). http://www.mois.go.kr/frt/a01/frtMain.do. Accessed 28 June 2018.
  38. National Intelligence Service (NIA). (2018). Homepage of NIA (in Korean). http://www.nis.go.kr/main.do. Accessed 1 August 2018.
  39. Neumayer, E., & Plumperw, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nigam, R., Su, Z., Elaidaoui, N., & Karuranga, E. (2009). Subsidiaries of developed country multinationals in an emerging country: A cultural perspective. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Shea, W. T., & Jaffe, J. M. (2004). Letter from president, bell labs, and president, bell labs advanced technologies. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 9(2), fmv–fmvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rozema, J. G., & Bond, A. J. (2015). Framing effectiveness in impact assessment: Discourse accommodation in controversial infrastructure development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency (SMPG). (2018). Homepage of SMPG (in Korean). http://www.smpa.go.kr/home/homeIndex.do?menuCode=www. Accessed 14 June 2018.
  44. Sharma, M. K., Sushil, & Jain, P. K. (2010). Revisiting flexibility in organizations: Exploring its impact on performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(3), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinclair, H., Doyle, E. E., & Johnston, D. M. (2012). Assessing emergency management training and exercises. Disaster Prevention and Management, 21(4), 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Staley, L. (2008). Labor’s ag minister picking up where coalition failed. Institute of Public Affairs Review, 60(1), 8.Google Scholar
  47. Statistics Korea. (2018). Homepage of Statistics Korea (in Korean). http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/index.action. Accessed 17 July 2018.
  48. Sushil, (2012a). Multiple perspectives of flexible systems management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sushil, (2012b). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sushil (2017) Theory Building using SAP-LAP Linkages: An Application in the Context of Disaster Management, Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2425-3
  51. Tiwari, A. K., Tiwari, A., Samuel, C., & Bhardwaj, P. (2013). Procurement flexibility as a tool for supplier selection in disastrous environments. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(4), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walshe, R. A., & Stancioff, C. E. (2018). Small island perspectives on climate change. Island Studies Journal, 13(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waters, M. (2010). Redefining and preparing for “water emergencies”. Fire Engineering, 163, 103–108.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, S. (2008). Rethinking the nature of disaster: From failed instruments of learning to a post-social understanding. Social Forces, 87(2), 1115–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2016). Modeling post-disaster challenges of humanitarian supply chains: A TISM approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yoo, I.-S. (2015). Disaster planning in Korea (in Korean). Hanyang Medical Reviews, 35, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zani, S. J. (2003). Traumatic disaster and titanic recuperation. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 3(31), 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zessin, K.-H. (2006). Emerging diseases: A global and biological perspective. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B, 53(s1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Environmental and Safety InstituteInje UniversityGimhae CityKorea

Personalised recommendations