Advertisement

Does Regulatory Flexibility Affect Risk Disclosures in Annual Report?

  • M. V. Shivaani
Original Research

Abstract

Flexibility is often defined in terms of autonomy of actions, freedom of expression, balancing in competing opposites and agility in actions. Such flexibility assumes greater significance in the dynamic system in which business operates. In this mutually reinforcing system, Indian regulators have accorded flexibility to companies to decide the nature, type, tone and time orientation of risk disclosures (in annual reports) based on their competitive position. Accordingly, the paper strives to ascertain how this regulatory flexibility is leveraged by Indian companies. For the purpose, content analysis and textual analysis are employed on over 4000 annual reports of NIFTY500 companies, covering a period 10-year period from 2005 to 2015. In tune with agency theory, proprietary cost theory, duality theory and contingency theory, the findings indicate that companies that are in a better competitive position tend to make greater and more comprehensive risk disclosures. The results are robust at company level, industry level and sectoral level. Further, the results unambiguously reflect how this flexibility affected the strategic decision making during the time of global financial crisis. Amidst calls for increasing regulations, particularly in the domain of disclosures, these findings clearly highlight the need for regulatory flexibility in decisions that have strategic implications for firms.

Keywords

Annual report Clause 49 Competitive position Content analysis Flexibility India Risk disclosure Textual analysis 

References

  1. Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(1), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar, M., & Mittal, R. K. (2010). Enterprise performance management and flexibility: Factors of effectiveness in upstream oil industry in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(4), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amran, A., Bin, A. M. R., & Hassan, B. C. H. M. (2009). Risk reporting: An exploratory study on risk management disclosure in Malaysian annual reports. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, A., Jia, X., & Totikidis, V. (2005). Parallels in private and public sector governance. Centre for International Corporate Governance Research, Victoria University, Melbourne. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/948/1. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, N., & Lemoine, J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389563.
  8. Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(1), 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishwas, S., & Dutta, S. (2015). Assessing market risk of Indian index funds. Global Business Review, 16(3), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabedo, J. D., & Tirado, J. M. (2004). The disclosure of risk in financial statements. Accounting Forum, 28(2), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure policies of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dougherty, S. M., Herd, R., & Chalaux, T. (2009). What is holding back productivity growth in India. Journal: Economic Studies OECD. ISSN 1995-2848 OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research: Academy of management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: Evidence from FTSE all share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30(3), 320–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elzahar, H., & Hussainey, K. (2012). Determinants of narrative risk disclosures in UK interim reports. Journal of Risk Finance, 13(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eppink, J. D. (1978). Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Planning, 11(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publication.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, J. W. (1972). Duality principles in the theory of cost and production—Revisited. International Economic Review, 13(1), 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greco, G. (2012). The management’s reaction to new mandatory risk disclosure: A longitudinal study on Italian listed companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(2), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofer, C. W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy Management Journal, 18(1), 784–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  25. Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes, J. S., & Pae, S. (2015). Discretionary disclosure, spillovers and competition. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). (2016). Various publications. www.icai.org/new_category.html?. Accessed 3 Apr 2017.
  28. Jain, P. K., Singh, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2013). Financial management practices. In an empirical study of Indian corporates. New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Janssen, M. C. W., & Roy, S. (2011). Strategic disclosure and signalling of product quality with price competition. In 38th EARIE conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1–3.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jia, J., Munro, L., & Buckby, S. (2016). A finer-grained approach to assessing the—quality (quantity and richness) of risk management disclosures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8–9), 770–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jorion, P. (2001). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Kanapathippillai, S., Johl, S. K., & Wines, G. (2016). Remuneration committee effectiveness and narrative remuneration disclosure. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 40, 384–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Li, N. (2010). Negotiated measurement rules in debt contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 1103–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2000). Risk management and reporting risk in the UK. Journal of Risk, 3(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosures in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(1), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorsch, J., & Lawrence, P. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luthans, F., & Ottemann, R. (1973). Motivation vs. learning approaches to organizational behaviour. Business Horizons, 16(6), 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marston, C., & Shrives, P. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. The British Accounting Review, 25(1), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milne, M., & Adler, R. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mishra, P., Mohit, D., & Parimal, (2011). Market concentration in Indian manufacturing sector: Measurement issues. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(49), 76–80.Google Scholar
  44. Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), 724–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., & Thomas, D. (2013). Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre- and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis periods. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30(1), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., & Danbolt, J. (2012a). The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(1), 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., Danbolt, J., & Thomas, D. A. (2012b). Voluntary corporate governance disclosures by post-apartheid South African listed corporations. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(1), 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2011). Risk-related disclosures by non-finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9), 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998). The impact of corporate attributes on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 33(5), 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patten, K., Whitworth, B., & Fjermestad, J. (2005). Leading IT flexibility: Anticipation, agility and adaptability. In 11th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2005, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, August 11–14.Google Scholar
  51. Roberts, N., & Stockport, G. J. (2009). Defining strategic flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(1), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ross, S. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan, C., & Ng, C. (2000). Public sector corporate governance disclosures: An examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
  55. Singh, S., Jain, P. K., & Yadav, S. S. (2012). Capital budgeting decisions: Evidence from India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 9(1), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singla, M., & Singh, S. (2018). Impact of institutional set-up on the responsiveness to change in a firm’s governance structure: A comparative study of public and private sector Enterprises in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stulz, R. M. (1996). Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sushil, (1997). Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sushil, (2000). Concept of systemic flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1(1), 77–80.Google Scholar
  60. Sushil, (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(1), 51–55.Google Scholar
  61. Sushil, (2005). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
  62. Sushil, (2008). The concept of a flexible enterprise. In Proceedings of GLOGIFT, 08, June 1416, 2008, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  63. Sushil, (2012a). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sushil, (2012b). Flexibility maturity model: Possibilities and directions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 75–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sushil, (2015). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sushil, (2016). The inflexibility of technology. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(4), 341–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sushil, & Stohr, E. A. (2014). The concept of a flexible enterprise. India: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues-Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verrecchia, R. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(1), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 97–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verrecchia, R. E., & Clinch, G. (1997). Competitive disadvantage and discretionary disclosure in industries. Australian Journal of Management, 22(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Management NagpurNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations