Does Regulatory Flexibility Affect Risk Disclosures in Annual Report?
Flexibility is often defined in terms of autonomy of actions, freedom of expression, balancing in competing opposites and agility in actions. Such flexibility assumes greater significance in the dynamic system in which business operates. In this mutually reinforcing system, Indian regulators have accorded flexibility to companies to decide the nature, type, tone and time orientation of risk disclosures (in annual reports) based on their competitive position. Accordingly, the paper strives to ascertain how this regulatory flexibility is leveraged by Indian companies. For the purpose, content analysis and textual analysis are employed on over 4000 annual reports of NIFTY500 companies, covering a period 10-year period from 2005 to 2015. In tune with agency theory, proprietary cost theory, duality theory and contingency theory, the findings indicate that companies that are in a better competitive position tend to make greater and more comprehensive risk disclosures. The results are robust at company level, industry level and sectoral level. Further, the results unambiguously reflect how this flexibility affected the strategic decision making during the time of global financial crisis. Amidst calls for increasing regulations, particularly in the domain of disclosures, these findings clearly highlight the need for regulatory flexibility in decisions that have strategic implications for firms.
KeywordsAnnual report Clause 49 Competitive position Content analysis Flexibility India Risk disclosure Textual analysis
- Armstrong, A., Jia, X., & Totikidis, V. (2005). Parallels in private and public sector governance. Centre for International Corporate Governance Research, Victoria University, Melbourne. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/948/1. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
- Bennett, N., & Lemoine, J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2389563.
- Dougherty, S. M., Herd, R., & Chalaux, T. (2009). What is holding back productivity growth in India. Journal: Economic Studies OECD. ISSN 1995-2848 OECD.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publication.Google Scholar
- Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). (2016). Various publications. www.icai.org/new_category.html?. Accessed 3 Apr 2017.
- Jain, P. K., Singh, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2013). Financial management practices. In an empirical study of Indian corporates. New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
- Janssen, M. C. W., & Roy, S. (2011). Strategic disclosure and signalling of product quality with price competition. In 38th EARIE conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1–3.Google Scholar
- Jorion, P. (2001). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mishra, P., Mohit, D., & Parimal, (2011). Market concentration in Indian manufacturing sector: Measurement issues. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(49), 76–80.Google Scholar
- Patten, K., Whitworth, B., & Fjermestad, J. (2005). Leading IT flexibility: Anticipation, agility and adaptability. In 11th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2005, Omaha, Nebraska, USA, August 11–14.Google Scholar
- Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
- Sushil, (2000). Concept of systemic flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 1(1), 77–80.Google Scholar
- Sushil, (2001). SAP-LAP framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2(1), 51–55.Google Scholar
- Sushil, (2005). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
- Sushil, (2008). The concept of a flexible enterprise. In Proceedings of GLOGIFT, 08, June 14–16, 2008, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar