Advertisement

Maritime Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 385–397 | Cite as

A vision at sea: women in fisheries in the Azores Islands, Portugal

  • Alison Laurie NeilsonEmail author
  • Rita São Marcos
  • Kas Sempere
  • Laurinda Sousa
  • Clarisse Canha
Research

Abstract

In the Azores, the work of women in fisheries has been invisible and undervalued for decades. This article presents a historical review of the hidden roles of these women and how they gained a place within the fishing community through the creation of associations and participatory research collaborations. This article reviews the relationships between scientists, government and fishers, which has been variable over time. This article contributes to the growing family of concepts describing the invisibility of women in fisheries in both policy and academic circles. It contributes to understanding how participatory research and collaborative policymaking have evolved and faced challenges in the Azores region, adding empirical work to these concepts. It explores the way that women fishers have been embraced at times through the government’s support to create fishing associations, but excluded at other times, via the specific consultation practices of the decision-makers. Participatory action research helped build opportunities for the women to be seen as fishers by the public as well as acknowledged within official circles, and to gain confidence, strengthen self-esteem and gender consciousness. This work explores how economic crisis and a prioritizing of scientific expertise over community knowledge and participation have reduced women’s engagement in governance, effectively muting their voices and opportunity to contribute. It is an example for keeping both a gendered and a practitioner-expert perspective on research and policy on fisheries.

Keywords

Azores Gender Knowledge Power Participation SS fisheries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the people who participated in multiple ways over the course of the research discussed in this article. We also wish to thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments which helped to improve the paper.

Funding information

This work was supported by EQUAL, a European Community Initiative Programme (2002-2003) for the“Mudança de Maré” project; Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, FCT) IF/01084/2013/CP1164/CT0001; SFRH/BD/131478/2017; Strategic Project (UID/SOC/50012/2019); the Regional Director for Science and Technology, Regional Secretary for Education and Science, Autonomous Region of the Azores DRCT-FRCT M2.1.2/I/007/2008; M3.2.2/I/020/2011; Iniciativas de Cooperação Bilateral - EEAGrants | Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian #201896.

References

  1. Almeida, Maria. 2018. Women mayors in Portugal: A case study in political representation and citizenship. Revista de Sociologia e Política 26 (68): 27–42.Google Scholar
  2. Baldacchino, Godfrey, and Eduardo Costa Duarte Ferreira. 2013. Competing notions of diversity in archipelago tourism: Transport logistics, official rhetoric and inter-island rivalry in the Azores. Island Studies Journal 8 (1): 84–104.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, Fikret, Johan Colding, and Carl Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10 (5): 1251–1262.Google Scholar
  5. Boal, Augusto. 1995. The rainbow of desire—the Boal method of theatre and therapy (A. Jackson, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bulhão Pato, Carlos, Alison Laurie Neilson, and Laurinda Sousa. 2011. Exploring the wealth of coastal fisheries: Listening to community voices, 21 -24 October 2011 Angra do Heroísmo & Ponta Delgada, Portugal, Final Report. http://conferencewealthofcoastalfisheriespt.blogspot.pt/
  7. Canha, Clarisse. 2012 October 31. Vozes da crise. Mulheres na pesca. Voz Marítimos. Acoriano Oriental, p. 17. retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/pt/document/view/12925349/31-10-2012-18073-voz-dos-maritimos-geral-pagina-16-ccrs
  8. Canha, Clarisse. 2015. O trabalho da UMAR nos Açores. Percurso feminista dos direitos das mulheres e a igualdade. Boletim do Núcleo Cultural da Horta 24: 93–110.Google Scholar
  9. Canha, Clarisse, and Maria José Raposo. 2006. Inclusão percursos para a igualdade, IPI. Uma experiência de valorização em Rabo de Peixe e São Mateus. Mulheres. Seu papel e saberes nas comunidades piscatórias, nos Açores. Ponta Delgada: UMAR-Açores.Google Scholar
  10. Chapin, Francis F. 1992. Channels for change: Emigrant tourists and the class structure of Azorean migration. Human Organisation 51 (1): 44–52.Google Scholar
  11. Coelho, Ana. 2017 May 29. Associação Sete Mares: Mulheres lideram projecto para valorizar a pesca e quem nela trabalha. Atlântico Expresso no page numbers. retrieved from https://pescazores.com/associacao-sete-mares-mulheres-lideram-projecto-para-valorizar-a-pesca-e-quem-nela-trabalha/
  12. Da Silva, Emanuel. 2012. Making and masking difference: Multiculturalism and sociological tensions in Toronto’s Portuguese Canadian market. Portuguese Studies Review 20 (2): 78.Google Scholar
  13. Daw, Tim M. 2008. How Fishers Count. Engaging with fishers’ knowledge in fisheries science and management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
  14. Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonne S. Lincoln. 2003. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Dias, Nelson, ed. 2014. 25 Years of participatory budgeting worldwide. São Brás de Alportel, Portugal: In Loco Association.Google Scholar
  16. Dias, Nelson, and Giovanni Allegretti. 2009. The variable geometry of participatory budgeting: Which lessons from the new Portuguese Explosion? In Learning democracy by doing: Alternative practices in citizenship education and participatory democracy, eds. Katherine Daly, Daniel Schugurensky and Kristina Lopes. 623–637. Toronto ON: University of Toronto, Transformative Learning Centre: Toronto.Google Scholar
  17. FAO. 2015. Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome, Italy: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/i4356en/I4356EN.pdf
  18. Ferreira, Pedro Daniel, Joaquim Luís Coimbra, and Isabel Menezes. 2012. ‘Diversity within diversity’: Exploring connections between community participation and citizenship. Journal of Social Science Education 11 (3): 120–134.Google Scholar
  19. Frangoudes, Katia. 2011. Women’s contribution in small-scale fisheries in the European Union. In World small-scale fisheries contemporary visions, ed. Ratana Chuenpagdee, 101–115. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Frangoudes, Katia. 2013. Women in fisheries: A European perspective. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  21. Frangoudes, Katia. 2018. Developing the inclusion of gender dimension in European fisheries sector. In In I International forum for socioeconomics of fisheries, 22-23 March 2018. Praia da: Vitória, Portugal.Google Scholar
  22. Frangoudes, Katia, and Siri Gerrard. 2018. (En)Gendering change in small-scale fisheries and fishing communities in a globalized world. Maritime Studies 17: 117–124.Google Scholar
  23. Frangoudes, Katia, and Joan O’Doherty. 2006. Legal recognition of women’s contributions in fisheries and aquaculture in the European Union. In Global symposium on Gender and Fisheries, 7th Asian Fisheries Forum, 1-2 December-2004 139–148. Penang, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  24. Garrido, Álvaro. 2018. As pescas em Portugal. Lisbon: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.Google Scholar
  25. Gerrard, Siri. 1983. ‘Kvinner i fiskeridistrikter – fiskerinæringas bakkemannskap.’  (Women in fishery districts – the shore crew of the fishery industry) - In Bjørn Hersoug (red.). 1983: Kan fiskerinæringa styres? (Can the fishing industry be governed?). Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
  26. Gerrard, Siri. 1995. When women take the lead: Changing conditions for women ́s activities, roles and knowledge in North Norwegian fishing communities. Social Science Information 34 (4): 593–631.Google Scholar
  27. Guerin, Benoît. 2017. Understanding grassroots factors that enable the small-scale fishing segment to influence fisheries management in the south western waters of the European Union. Analysis of field interviews, January Report. European Commission Funding FISH. www.cc-sud.eu/index.php/en/swwac/our-projects
  28. Gustavsson, Madeleine, and Mark Riley. 2018. Women, capitals and fishing lives: Exploring gendered dynamics in the Llŷn Peninsula small-scale fishery (Wales, UK). Maritime Studies 17 (2): 223–231.Google Scholar
  29. Harper, Sarah, and Danika Kleiber. 2016. Counting on women. Yemaya 51: 2–3.Google Scholar
  30. Harper, Sarah, Dirk Zeller, Melissa Hauzer, Daniel Pauly, and Rashid Sumaila Ussif. 2013. Women and fisheries: Contribution to food security and local economies. Marine Policy 39: 56–63.Google Scholar
  31. Harper, Sarah, Charlotte Grubb, Margot Stiles, and Ussif Rashid Sumaila. 2017. Contributions by women to fisheries economies: Insights from five maritime countries. Coastal Management 45 (2): 91–106.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, Sherick, Julie L. Pennington, and Sara Makris. 2012. Translating autoethnography across the AERA standards: Toward understanding autoethnographic scholarship as empirical research. Educational Researcher 41 (6): 209–219.Google Scholar
  33. INE, Instituto Nacional de Estatística. 2012. Censos 2011 Resultados Definitivos - Região Autónoma dos Açores. Lisbon: INE.Google Scholar
  34. James, Richard. 2012. Social inclusion in a globalised higher education environment: The issue of equitable access to university in Australia. In Social inclusion and higher education, eds. Tehmina N. Basit, and Sally Tomlinson, 83–107. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jentoft, Svein, Ratana Chuenpagdee, Alida Bundy, and Robin Mahon. 2010. Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy 34 (6): 1315–1321.Google Scholar
  36. Kincheloe, Joe L., and Kenneth Tobin. 2009. The much exaggerated death of positivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education 4 (3): 513–528.Google Scholar
  37. Kleiber, Danika Lynn, Leila M. Harris, and Amanda C. J. Vincent. 2015. Gender and small-scale fisheries: A case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries 16: 547–562.Google Scholar
  38. Liswood, Laura. 2019. Women’s voices must be heard in the battle to save the ocean. www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/womens-voices-must-be-heard-in-the-battle-to-save-the-ocean/
  39. MacAlister Elliott and Partners Ltd. 2002. Report of the role of women in the fisheries sector. Final Report. Series No. 1443/R/03/A, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/sites/fisheries/files/docs/body/mainreport_en.pdf
  40. Menini, Elisabetta, Firdaous Halim, Daniela Gabriel, Juan Luis Suarez de Vivero, Helena Calado, Fabiana Moniz, and Mario Caña Varona. 2018. Geopolitical framework of the Macaronesia region. GPS Azores project: Ponta Delgada.Google Scholar
  41. Monfort, Marie Christine. 2015. Fishing out the invisible. Samudra Report 71: 31–34.Google Scholar
  42. Moreira, Claudio, and Marcelo Diversi. 2014. The coin will continue to fly: Dismantling the myth of the lone expert. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14 (4): 298–302.Google Scholar
  43. Msomphora, Mbachi Ruth. 2016. The role of science in fisheries management in Europe: From mode 1 to mode 2. Maritime Studies 15: 3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-016-0042-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neilson, Alison Laurie. 2018. Collaboration between community and university for social issues in the fishing community. In I International forum for socioeconomics of fisheries, 22-23 March 2018. Praia da Vitória, Portugal.Google Scholar
  45. Neilson, Alison Laurie, and Rita São Marcos. 2016a. Casting nets for social inclusion: Weaving partnerships across the sea - Final Report, 21. Coimbra: Centre for Social Studies.Google Scholar
  46. Neilson, Alison Laurie, and Rita São Marcos. 2016b. Civil participation between private and public spheres: The island sphere and fishing communities in the Azores archipelago. Island Studies Journal 11: 585–600.Google Scholar
  47. Neilson, Alison Laurie, and Rita São Marcos. 2019. Relational ontologies and hybridity: Fishing for empathy between Azorean fishers and scientists. Marine Policy 105: 30–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neilson, Alison Laurie, Carlos de Bulhão Pato, and Laurinda Sousa. 2012. A short reflection on research and fishing cultures performing knowledge together. Maria Scientia 2: 73–82.Google Scholar
  49. Neilson, Alison Laurie, Rosalina Gabriel, Ana Moura Arroz, and Enésima Mendonca. 2014. Perspectives about the sea in the Azores: Respecting narratives that sustain inshore fishing communities. In Social issues in sustainable fisheries management, ed. Julie Urquhart, Tim G. Acott, David Symes, and Minghua Zhao, 319–338. Amsterdam: MARE and Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Nóbrega, Teresa (Director). 2006. Repórter Açores: Pescadoras da Terra e do Mar [Television broadcast]. Ponta Delgada, Açores: Rádio Televisão Portuguesa-Açores. Available at: http://videos.sapo.pt/yT6cAhytVrqlMcejdZMj
  51. Phillipson, Jeremy, and David Symes. 2015. Finding a middle way to develop Europe’s fisheries dependent areas: The role of fisheries local action groups. Sociologia Ruralis 55 (3): 343–359.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pielke, Roger A., Jr. 2007. The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pinkerton, Evelyn, and Reade Davis. 2015. Neoliberalism and the politics of enclosure in North American small-scale fisheries. Maritime Policy 61: 303–312.Google Scholar
  54. Porter, Marilyn. 1985. “She Was Skipper of the Shore-Crew:” Notes on the History of the Sexual Division of Labour in Newfoundland. Labour / Le Travail 15:105.Google Scholar
  55. Power, Nicole Gerarda. 2000. Women processing workers as knowledgeable resource users: Connecting gender, local knowledge, and development in the Newfoundland fishery. In Finding our sea legs. Linking fishery people and their knowledge with science and management, ed. Barbara Neis and Lawrence Felt, 206–223. St. John’s: ISER books.Google Scholar
  56. Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury. 2008. The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Rocha, J.A. Oliveira, and Joaquim Filipe Araujo. 2007. Administrative reform in Portugal: Problems and prospects. International Review of Administrative Sciences 73: 583–596.Google Scholar
  58. Rocklin, Delphine. 2016. State of the art in small-scale fisheries. In Small-scale fisheries of the world, ed. Ratana Chuenpagdee and Delphine Rocklin, 8. St. John’s, NL: TBTI Publication Series.Google Scholar
  59. Salmi, Pekka, and Kirsi Sonck-Rautio. 2018. Invisible work, ignored knowledge? Changing gender roles, division of labor, and household strategies in Finnish small-scale fisheries. Maritime Studies 17 (2): 213–221.Google Scholar
  60. Sempere, Kas, and Rogéria Sousa. 2008. As mulheres na pesca nos Açores. Estamos cá. Existimos. Ponta Delgada: UMAR-Açores.Google Scholar
  61. Silva, Luís. 2015. Foucault in the landscape: Questioning governmentality in the Azores. Landscape Research 4 (4): 397–410.Google Scholar
  62. Symes, David. 2014. Finding solutions: Resilience theory and Europe’s small-scale fisheries. In Social issues in sustainable fisheries management, ed. Julie Urquhart, Tim G. Acott, David Symes, and Minghua Zhao, 23–41. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  63. Tavares, Orlanda, Vasco Lança, and Alberto Amaral. 2017. Academic Inbreeding in Portugal: Does insularity play a role? Higher Education Policy 30.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0029-1.Google Scholar
  64. Tomás, Licínio Vicente. 2008. Crisscrossing destinies: A look at the work of generations of Azorean women. In Women and work in the Azores and the immigrant communities, ed. Rosa Maria Neves Simas, 1087–1100. Ponta Delgado: UMAR-Açores.Google Scholar
  65. Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2014. Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 811–818.Google Scholar
  66. Urfalino, Philippe. 2010. Deciding as bringing deliberation to a close. Social Science Information 49 (1): 111–140.Google Scholar
  67. Yodanis, Carrie L. 2000. Constructing gender and occupational segregation: A study of women and work in fishing communities. Qualitative Sociology 23 (3): 267–290.Google Scholar
  68. Zhao, Minghua, Marilyn Tyzack, Rodney Anderson, and Estera Onoakpovike. 2013. Women as visible and invisible workers in fisheries: A case study of Northern England. Marine Policy 37: 69–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social Studies, CESUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Christian Aid InternationalLondonUK
  3. 3.UMAR-AçoresPonta DelgadaPortugal

Personalised recommendations