Perioperative Oxygenation Targets in Adults
Purpose of Review
Oxygen therapy is administered liberally to give a margin of safety against life-threatening hypoxia; however, excessive supplementary oxygen may increase the risk of serious adverse events with a potential negative impact on both morbidity and mortality. This review focuses on the current evidence and emerging data relating to oxygen therapy in the perioperative setting.
Current controversies around evidence-based guidelines for perioperative oxygen therapy present a serious challenge for anesthetists. Recommendations vary from very high fractions of inspired oxygen for prevention of wound infections to targeting normoxemia for prevention of organ dysfunction. The relevance of emerging evidence of increased mortality with liberal oxygen therapy in acutely ill adults to the predominantly elective surgical population is unclear. However, recent data indicate that evidence to support liberal oxygen to prevent wound infections is frail, and so the potential that liberal oxygen therapy might cause harm is of particular concern.
While optimal oxygenation targets are a matter of debate, defining upper limits of acceptable arterial oxygenation perioperatively in surgical patients to reduce tissue injury induced by hyperoxemia is a reasonable approach.
KeywordsOxygenation Oxygen toxicity Surgery Anesthesia Recovery room Intensive care unit
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Bodil S. Rasmussen is the chief investigator for the HOT-ICU trial, which is a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing a higher versus a lower oxygenation target in critically ill patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure acutely admitted to the intensive care unit.
Daniel Frei declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Olav L. Schjørring is the coordinating investigator of the aforementioned HOT-ICU trial.
Christian S. Meyhoff is the chief investigator for the VIXIE trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing perioperative oxygen fractions; site investigator in the HOT-ICU trial; co-author of several Cochrane reviews about oxygen therapy; and he was the primary investigator of the PROXI trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing perioperative oxygen fractions.
Paul J. Young is the chief investigator for the ICU-ROX trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing conservative oxygen therapy with standard oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated adults, and is the senior investigator for the HOT ROX trial, a feasibility study comparing restrictive oxygen, standard oxygen, and liberal oxygen in adults undergoing major surgery.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 8.•• Staehr-Rye AK, Meyhoff CS, Scheffenbichler FT, Vidal Melo MF, Gätke MR, Walsh JL, et al. High intraoperative inspiratory oxygen fraction and risk of major respiratory complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(1):140–9 Posthoc analysis of the PROXI study with focus on major pulmonary complications. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.•• Chu DK, Kim LH, Young PJ, Zamiri N, Almenawer SA, Jaeschke R, et al. Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;391(10131):1693–705 Published in 2018 the largest systematic review of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy in acutely ill adults. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.• Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276–e87 The much debated 2016 WHO guidelines with a recommendation to use high inspiratory fraction of oxygen to prevent surgical site infection. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.•• Myles PS, Carlisle JB, Scarr B. Evidence for compromised data integrity in studies of liberal peri-operative inspired oxygen. Anaesthesia. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14584 Evidence for compromised data integrity in the studies of the 2016 WHO guidelines.
- 16.•• de Jonge S, Egger M, Latif A, Loke YK, Berenholtz S, Boermeester M, et al. Effectiveness of 80% vs 30-35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(3):325–34 A 2019 update of WHO guidelines of surgical site prevention. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ó Brian D, Nickson C, Pilcher DV, Udy AA. Early hyperoxia in patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Neurocrit Care 2018:29(3):443–451.Google Scholar
- 26.•• Roffe C, Nevatte T, Sim J, Bishop J, Ives N, Ferdinand P, et al. Effect of routine low-dose oxygen supplementation on death and disability in adults with acute stroke: the stroke oxygen study randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(12):1125–35 Largest RCT of oxygen therapy in patients with stroke. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Schjørring O, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Keus E, Laake J, et al. Handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) – protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing a lower versus a higher oxygenation target in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2019; [Ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 31.•• Young PJ, Mackle DM, Bailey MJ, Beasley RW, Bennett VL, Deane AM, et al. Intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX): results of the pilot phase. Crit Care Resusc. 2017;19(4):344–54 The ICU-ROX study is completed and the results are expected soon. Google Scholar
- 35.Wetterslev J, Meyhoff CS, Jorgensen LN, Gluud C, Lindschou J, Rasmussen LS. The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD008884.Google Scholar
- 56.• Dunham AM, Grega MA, Brown CH 4th, McKhann GM, Baumgartner WA, Gottesman RF. Perioperative low arterial oxygenation is associated with increased stroke risk in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):38–43 Increased risk of stroke with low perioperative oxygenation in cardiac surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 58.•• Smit B, Smulders YM, de Waard MC, Boer C, Vonk AB, Veerhoek D, et al. Moderate hyperoxic versus near-physiological oxygen targets during and after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Crit Care. 2016;20:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1240-6 The largest RCT of oxygen therapy in cardiac surgery. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.• Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, Donati A, Rinaldi L, Marudi A, et al. Effect of conservative vs conventional oxygen therapy on mortality among patients in an intensive care unit: the oxygen-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1583–9 The largest published RCT on oxygen therapy in ICU patients (prematurely stopped). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Young PJ, Beasley RW, Capellier G, Eastwood GM, Webb SA, Group ACT, et al. Oxygenation targets, monitoring in the critically ill: a point prevalence study of clinical practice in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Resusc. 2015;17(3):202–7.Google Scholar
- 66.Helmerhorst HJ, Schultz MJ, van der Voort PH, Bosman RJ, Juffermans NP, de Wilde RB, et al. Effectiveness and clinical outcomes of a two-step implementation of conservative oxygenation targets in critically ill patients: a before and after trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(3):554–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar