Advertisement

Current Anesthesiology Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 100–109 | Cite as

Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Advances

  • Karen R. BoretskyEmail author
Pediatric Anesthesia (J Lerman, Section Editor)
  • 56 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pediatric Anesthesia

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To present recent developments in pediatric regional anesthesia (RA) including safety, complications, special populations, evidence-based trends, and ultrasound guidance. The data presented should be used to improve outcomes of children receiving RA.

Recent Findings

Current data demonstrates a very low occurrence of serious complications and validates the use of GA for block placement in children. Fewer neuraxial blocks are performed in favor of peripheral blocks as the use of ultrasound guidance has made new blocks possible and old blocks better and safer. Neonates and infants have more RA options. Adjuvant medications and ambulatory catheters increase the duration of RA and facilitate cost-effective, low-risk hospital discharge. The local anesthetic systemic toxicity checklist reinforces new guidelines.

Summary

Increasing pediatric-specific RA data shows increased analgesic choices and improving patient care. Large well-designed studies to precisely define the risks and benefits and appropriate applications of novel ideas and technologies are needed.

Keywords

Pediatric Regional anesthesia Local anesthetics Acute pain 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Karen R. Boretsky declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Bosenberg A. Benefits of regional anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;28(8):684–5 Overview of basic pediatric regional anesthesia from a beloved expert.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):248–73 Outlines increasingly important concepts of multi-modal therapy from the highest sources.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, Orliaguet G, Courrèges P. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(12):1061–9 Landmark data collection study in pediatric regional anesthesia for safety analysis.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Walker BJ. Complications in pediatric regional anesthesia. An analysis of more than 1,000.000 blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anaesthesia Network. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(4):721–32 Most recent landmark data collection study in pediatric regional anesthesia for safety analysis with over 100,000 children.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    • Vecchione T, Zurakowski D, Boretsky K. Thoracic paravertebral nerve blocks in pediatric patients: safety and clinical experience. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(6):1588–90 In-depth analysis of safety and applications of paravertebral nerve blocks.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Gurnaney H, Kraemer FW, Maxwell L, Muhly WT, Schleelein L, Ganesh A. Ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children and adolescents: a longitudinal 8-year single center study. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(3):621–7 Single-center study looking at a stable, ongoing ambulatory catheter program.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Long JB, Joselyn AS, Bhalla T, Tobias JD, De Oliveira GS, Suresh S. The use of neuraxial catheters for postoperative analgesia in neonates: a multicenter safety analysis from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(6):1965–70.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Lonnqvist PA, De Oliveira GS, De Leon Casasola O, et al. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommendations on local anesthetics and adjuvants dosage in pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):211–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    •• Taicher BM, Routh JC, Eck JB, Ross SS, Wiener JS, Ross AK. The association between caudal anesthesia and increased risk of postoperative surgical complications in boys undergoing hypospadias repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(7):688–94 Study reveals a surprising association between caudal analgesia and urologic complications after hypospadias repair.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    •• Taenzer AH, Walker BJ, Bosenberg AT, Martin L, Suresh S, Polaner DM, et al. Asleep versus awake: does it matter?: Pediatric regional block complications by patient state: a report from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(4):279–83 Study specifically addresses the question of safety of performing RA with patients asleep.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gurnaney H, Muhly WT, Kraemer FW, Cucchiaro G, Ganesh A. Safety of pediatric continuous interscalene block catheters placed under general anesthesia: a single center’s experience. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(3):377–83.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taenzer A, Walker B, Bosenberg A, Krane E, Martin L, Polaner D, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks under general anesthesia in children: is this safe practice?: A report from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(6):502–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    •• Gitman M, Barrington MJ. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: a review of recent case reports and registries. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):124–30 First study to identify risk factors for LAST in infants and children.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu RN, Houck CS, Casta A, Blum RH. Institutional policy changes to prevent cardiac toxicity associated with bupivacaine penile blockade in infants. A A Case Rep. 2016;7(3):71–5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groban L, Deal DD, Vernon JC, James RL, Butterworth J. Cardiac resuscitation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(1):37–43.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stewart J, Kellett N, Castro D. The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):412–6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    •• Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Fettiplace MR, Gitman M, Memtsoudis SG, Mörwald EE, et al. The third American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine practice advisory on local anesthetic systemic toxicity: executive summary 2017. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):113–23 Very recent update on the understanding of LAST with revisions to guidelines for treatment treatment.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hiller DB, Di Gregorio G, Ripper R, Kelly K, Massad M, Edelman L, et al. Epinephrine impairs lipid resuscitation from bupivacaine overdose: a threshold effect. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(3):498–505.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Presley JD, Chyka PA. Intravenous lipid emulsion to reverse acute drug toxicity in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(5):735–43.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• Fettiplace MR, Weinberg G. The mechanisms underlying lipid resuscitation therapy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):138–49 Outlines current understanding of the mechanism of ILE for the treatment of LAST.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    •• Neal JM, Woodward CM, Harrison TK. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine checklist for managing local anesthetic systemic toxicity: 2017 version. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):150–3 An excellent checklist for treatment of LAST.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rochette A, Dadure C, Raux O, Troncin R, Mailhé P, Capdevila X. A review of pediatric regional anesthesia practice during a 17-year period in a single institution. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(9):874–80.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsui BCH, Berde CB. Caudal analgesia and anesthesia techniques in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;18:283–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schnabel A, Poepping DM, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of clonidine as additive for caudal regional anesthesia: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21:1219–30.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Trifa M, Tumin D, Tobias JD. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for caudal anesthesia and analgesia in children. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(7):836–47 Nice meta-analysis of studies on perineural administration of dexmedatomidine, the newest addition to the LA adjuvants.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brummett CM, Norat MA, Palmisano JM, Lydic R. Perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with bupivacaine enhances sensory and motor blockade in sciatic nerve block without inducing neurotoxicity in rat. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:502–11. 55.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Konakci S, Adanir T, Yilmaz G, Rezanko T. The efficacy and neurotoxicity of dexmedetomidine administered via the epidural route. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:403–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vranken JH, Troost D, De Haan P, Pennings FA, Van Der Vegt MH, Dijkgraaf MGW, et al. Severe toxic damage to the rabbit spinal cord after intrathecal administration of preservative-free S(+)-ketamine. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:813–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pehora C, Pearson AME, Kaushal A, Crawford MW, Johnston B. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve block. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017, Issue 11. Art. No: CD011770.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Lam DKM, Corry GN, Tsui BCH. Evidence for the use of ultrasound imaging in pediatric regional anesthesia: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(2):229–41 Identifies the benefits of adding ultrasound guidance to RA.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bosenberg AT. Innovative peripheral nerve blocks facilitated by ultrasound guidance. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(8):684–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oberndorfer U, Marhofer P, Bösenberg A, Willschke H, Felfernig M, Weintraud M, et al. Ultrasonographic guidance for sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:797–801.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dolan J, Lucie P, Geary T, Smith M, Kenny GNC. The rectus sheath block: accuracy of local anesthetic placement by trainee anesthesiologists using loss of resistance or ultrasound guidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(3):247–50.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(4):289–99.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsui BCH, Suresh S. Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents: a review of current literature and its application in the practice of neuraxial blocks. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(3):719–28.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lundblad M, Lönnqvist PA, Eksborg S, Marhofer P. Segmental distribution of high-volume caudal anesthesia in neonates, infants, and toddlers as assessed by ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(2):121–7.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Keplinger M, Marhofer P, Klug W, Reiter B, Stimpfl T, Kettner SC, et al. Feasibility and pharmacokinetics of caudal blockade in children and adolescents with 30–50 kg of body weight. Paediatr Anaesth. 26(11):1053–9.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sinskey JL, Vecchione TM, Ekstrom BG, Boretsky K. Benefits of ultrasound imaging for placement of caudal epidural blockade in 3 pediatric patients. A A Pract. 2018;10(11):307–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kelleher S, Boretsky K, Alrayashi W. Images in anesthesiology: use of ultrasound to facilitate neonatal spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):561.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Miller BR. Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block in pediatric patients using a long-axis, in-plane needle technique: a report of three cases. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(12):1261–4.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kelleher S, Boretsky K. Use of ultrasound to facilitate placement of spinal anesthetic in a 1.5 kg infant. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):561.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boretsky K, Visoiu M, Bigeleisen P. Ultrasound-guided approach to the paravertebral space for catheter insertion in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(12):1193–8.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fredrickson MJ, Seal P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for neonatal abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(3):469–72.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tognù A, Cauli V, De Simone N, Aurini L, Manfrini M, Bonarelli S. In-plane ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block using catheter-over-needle technique in a 14-month-old baby. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(4):538–41.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gaudet-Ferrand I, De La Arena P, Bringuier S, Raux O, Hertz L, Kalfa N, et al. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in children: a new technique of ultrasound-guided transperineal approach. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(1):53–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hernandez MA, Vecchione T, Boretsky K. Dermatomal spread following posterior transversus abdominis plane block in pediatric patients: our initial experience. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(3):300–4.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Eastburn E, Hernandez MA, Boretsky K. Technical success of the ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block in older children and adolescents for hip arthroscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(11):1120–4.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Neubrand TL, Roswell K, Deakyne S, Kocher K, Wathen J. Fascia iliaca compartment nerve block versus systemic pain control for acute femur fractures in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30(7):469–73.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shariat AN, Hadzic A, Xu D, Shastri U, Kwofie K, Gandhi K, et al. Fascia iliaca block for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(3):201–5.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sandeman DJ, Bennett M, Dilley AV, Perczuk A, Lim S, Kelly KJ. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):882–6.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Curley G, McDonnell JG, Laffey JG. Ipsilateral transversus abdominis plane block provides effective analgesia after appendectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 111(4):998–1003.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lapmahapaisan S, Tantemsapya N, Aroonpruksakul N, Maisat W, Suraseranivongse S. Efficacy of surgical transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief following abdominal surgery in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(6):614–20.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lorenzo AJ, Lynch J, Matava C, El-Beheiry H, Hayes J. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane vs surgeon administered intraoperative regional field infiltration with bupivacaine for early postoperative pain control in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2014;192(1):207–13.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    •• Støving K, Rothe C, Rosenstock CV, Aasvang EK, Lundstrøm LH, Lange KHW. Cutaneous sensory block area, muscle-relaxing effect, and block duration of the transversus abdominis plane block: a randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(4):355–62 Key study showing the lack of predictable dermatomal coverage with TAP blocks paving the way for QL blocks.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Blanco R, McDonnell JG. Optimal point of injection: the quadratus lumborum type I and II blocks. http://www.respond2articles.com/ANA/ forums/post/1550.aspx. 2013. Accessed 17 Jan 2019.
  56. 56.
    • Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Quadratus lumborum block: analgesic effects and chronological ropivacaine concentrations after laparoscopic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:146–50 Demonstrates analgesic duration of 24+ hours for QL block.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Öksüz G, Bilal B, Gürkan Y, Urfalioǧlu A, Arslan M, Gişi G, et al. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block in children undergoing low abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(5):674–9.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(6):757–62.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    La Colla L, Ben-David B, Merman R. Quadratus lumborum block as an alternative to lumbar plexus block for hip surgery: a report of 2 cases. A A Case Rep. 2017;8(1):4–6.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    El-Boghdadly K, Elsharkawy H, Short A, Chin KJ. Quadratus lumborum block nomenclature and anatomical considerations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(4):548–9.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tsui BCH, Fonseca A, Munshey F, McFadyen G, Caruso TJ. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019;53(September 2018):29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;47:47–9.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    • Ueshima H. Pneumothorax after the erector spinae plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2018;48:12 First major complication for ESP block.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Naja ZM, Ziade FM, Kamel R, El-Kayali S, Daoud N, El-Rajab MA. The effectiveness of pudendal nerve block versus caudal block anesthesia for hypospadias in children. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1401–7.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kendigelen P, Tutuncu AC, Emre S, Altindas F, Kaya G. Pudendal versus caudal block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:610–5.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Saavedra-Belaunde JA, Soto-Aviles O, Jorge J, Escudero K, Vazquez-Cruz M, Perez-Brayfield M. Can regional anesthesia have an effect on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing distal hypospadia surgery? J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):45e1–4.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chelly JE, Clark LD, Gebhard RE, Raw RM, Atchabahian A. Consensus of the orthopedic anesthesia, pain, and rehabilitation society on the use of peripheral nerve blocks in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(1):69–74.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    • Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, Enneking FK. Executive summary: regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;35(1):102–5 Nice collection of all the data on bleeding complications associated with RA.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    • Hohn A, Trieschmann U, Franklin J, Machatschek J-N, Kaufmann J, Herff H, et al. Incidence of peri-operative paediatric cardiac arrest: influence of a specialised paediatric anaesthesia team. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;36(1):55–63 Study demonstrates continued increased risk of perioperative complications associated with age < 12 months.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Westerkamp AC, De Geus AF, Molenbuur B, Meyer P, Wietasch JKG, Struys MMRF, et al. Comparing peri-operative complications of paediatric and adult anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35(4):280–8.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Morton NS, Errera A. APA national audit of pediatric opioid infusions. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(2):119–25.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chidambaran V, Olbrecht V, Hossain M, Sadhasivam S, Rose J, Meyer MJ. Risk predictors of opioid-induced critical respiratory events in children: naloxone use as a quality measure of opioid safety. Pain Med (United States). 2014;15(12):2139–49.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ikonomidou C, Bosch F, Miksa M, Bittigau P, Vöckler J, Dikranian K, et al. Blockade of NMDA receptors and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Science. 1999;283(5398):70–4.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, Benshoff ND, Dikranian K, Zorumski CF, et al. Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci. 2003;23(3):876–82.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J, Katusic SK, Barbaresi WJ, Mickelson C, et al. Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):796–804.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    •• Davidson AJ, Disma N, De Graaff JC, Withington DE, Dorris L, Bell G, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10015):239–50 Study showing no increased risk of neurotoxicity in infants exposed to a single short GA compared to SA but more hypotensive episodes.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Soriano SG, Vutskits L, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hemmings HC. Thinking, fast and slow: highlights from the 2016 BJA seminar on anaesthetic neurotoxicity and neuroplasticity. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(3):443–7.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Crosby G, Davis PJ. General anesthesia in infancy is associated with learning disabilities - or not. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(6):1270–2.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jones LJ, Craven PD, Lakkundi A, Foster JP, Badawi N. Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in early infancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD003669.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Williams RK, Adams DC, Aladjem EV, Kreutz JM, Sartorelli KH, Vane DW, et al. The safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia for surgery in infants: the Vermont infant spinal registry. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:67–71.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Puncuh F, Lampugnani E, Kokki H. Use of spinal anaesthesia in paediatric patients: a single centre experience with 1132 cases. Pediatr Anesth. 2004;14:564–7.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mueller CM, Sinclair TJ, Stevens M, Esquivel M, Gordon N. Regional block via continuous caudal infusion as sole anesthetic for inguinal hernia repair in conscious neonates. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017;33(3):341–5.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Davidson AJ, Morton NS, Arnup SJ, De Graaff JC, Disma N, Withington DE, et al. Apnea after awake regional and general anesthesia in infants: the general anesthesia compared to spinal anesthesia study-comparing apnea and neurodevelopmental outcomes, a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(1):38–54.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lerman J, Strong HA, LeDez KM, Swartz J, Rieder MJ, Burrows FA. Effects of age on the serum concentration of α1-acid glycoprotein and the binding of lidocaine in pediatric patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;46(2):219–25.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mazoit JX. Local anesthetics and their adjuncts. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(1):31–8.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Gunter JB. Benefit and risks of local anesthetics in infants and children. Pediatr Drugs. 2002;4(10):649–72.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tsui BCH, Boretsky K, Berde C. Maximum recommended dosage of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(8):895–6.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    • Veneziano GTJ. Chloroprocaine for epidural anesthesia in infants and children. Pediatr Anesthesiol. 2017;27:581–90 Excellent summary of chloroprocaine use in infants and young children for epidurals.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Muhly WT, Gurnaney HG, Kraemer FW, Ganesh A, Maxwell LG. A retrospective comparison of ropivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine continuous thoracic epidural analgesia for management of postthoracotomy pain in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(11):1162–7.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Boretsky KR, Bardain S, Jennings R, Zurakowski D, Dodson B, Waisel D. Survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterms resuscitated with different oxygen fractions. Pediatrics. 2015;25(11):1151–7.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cladis FP, Litman RS. Transient cardiovascular toxicity with unintentional intravascular injection of 3% 2-chloroprocaine in a 2-month-old infant. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(1):181–3.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hernandez MA, Boretsky K, Polaner D. Chloroprocaine: local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a 9-month infant with paravertebral catheter. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(6):665–6.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Joshi G, Beck D, Emerson R, Halaszynski T, Jahr J, Lipman A, … Sinatra R. Defining new directions for more effective management of surgical pain in the United States: highlights of the inaugural Surgical Pain Congress™. Am Surg. n.d.;80(3):219-228.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Visoiu M, Joy LN, Grudziak JS, Chelly JE. The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:1141–8.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    •• Harbaugh CM, Lee JS, Hu HM, McCabe SE, Voepel-Lewis T, Englesbe MJ, et al. Persistent opioid use among pediatric patients after surgery. Pediatrics. 2018;141(1):e20172439.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-2439 Horrifyingly high incidence of persistent opioid use after first exposure in the perioperative period.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    •• Brummett CM, Waljee JF, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe MJ, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in us adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):e170504. Published online April 12, 2017. Corrected on January 9, 2019. Reinforces the results of the Harbough study. Again, a horrifyingly high incidence of persistent opioid use after first exposure in the perioperative period.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R Hadzic A, Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, et al. The second ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Executive Summary 2015 Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):401–30.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    •• Walker BJ, Noonan KJ, Bosenberg AT. Evolving compartment syndrome not masked by a continuous peripheral nerve block: evidence-based case management. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(4):393–7 Evidence of timely diagnosis of ACS with continuous PNBs in place.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ivani G, Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Lonnqvist PA, Krane E, et al. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine joint committee practice advisory on controversial topics in pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):526–32.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    •• Livingston KS, Glotzbecker MP, Shore BJ. Pediatric acute compartment syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(5):358–64 Excellent state-of-the-art review of pediatric acute compartment syndrome.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    • Badhe S, Baiju D, Elliot R, Rowles J, Calthorpe D. The “silent” compartment syndrome. Injury. 2009;40(2):220–2 Evidence that compartment syndrome can ocassionally present without a significant pain component.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Boretsky K, Cody S. Chapter 25: pediatrics-orthopedic surgery. In: Anderson, Wilson, Rosenblatt, editors. Decision-making in orthopedic and regional anesthesiology: a case-based approach; 2015. p. 74–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston Childrens HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations