How Do We Know? Comparisons of Existing Datasets for Overseas Surgical Missions
Purpose of Review
Over five billion people lack access to safe surgery when they need it. Short-term surgical missions from high-resource countries are a popular strategy to try and address this deficit. Each year, thousands of providers spend billions of dollars participating in short-term surgical missions. These missions are poorly characterized in aggregate. In this exercise, we performed reviews of two databases in an attempt to identify and characterize short-term surgical missions to Uganda. The first, a traditional search of the medical literature. The second, an unorthodox search of the internet. We compare the results of each in terms of motive, trip length, operations performed, surgery type, country of origin, evidence of teaching, recurring missions, and year of mission.
We found only one article in the academic literature that fits our criteria. We found 43 individual organizations responsible for 129 individual trips in our internet search. These are characterized in this paper.
The medical literature contains few traces of short-term surgical trips in Uganda. The internet contains many traces. These traces are rich in both qualitative and quantitative data. It is possible to mine, organize, and evaluate this data to better understand what is happening on the ground in Uganda and potentially the rest of the world.
KeywordsMedical mission Humanitarian mission Surgical mission Surgical trip Medical aid Surgical aid
We would like to acknowledge the help received in conducting our Uganda internet search and databasing from the following: Diane Ellis, MD; Abigail Runnels; and Emily Stuart, BS.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Andrea N. Davis, Lily Gutnik, F. Arran Seiler, and Sean Runnels declare they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.• Dusseldorp J, Hodges A, Patel A, Marchac A, Firmin F. Reconstruction of punitive ear amputations in Uganda: a unique surgical burden of disease. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1196–8 The article identified in our academic literature review that reported a short-term surgical mission. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.•• Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624 A summary of global unmet surgical needs with proposed solutions to achieve health, welfare, and economic development goals. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.• Shrime MG, Sleemi A, Ravilla TD. Charitable platforms in global surgery: a systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and role training. World J Surg. 2015;39(1):10–20 A systematic review of charitable organizations and surgical care in developing areas. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Uganda factbook 2018, [cited; Available from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ug.html.
- 8.Human development reports (obtained 2018), [cited; Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/UGA.
- 14.Harris MJ. We need more reports of Global Health Anesthesia articles. Anesthesiology. 2015;124:1–269.Google Scholar