Current and Future Perspectives in Robotic Endovascular Surgery
Purpose of Review
Endovascular robotic surgery remains a little known entity in the general medical community shrouded with misconception and intrigue. However, with continued evolution of robotic technology, it will inevitably become an integral part of the future vascular surgery practice.
Receiving 501(k) clearance for use in peripheral vascular interventions from the US Food and Drug Administration in February 2018, the Corindus CorPath® GRX is the latest advancement in endovascular robotics. With seven motors controlled from a remote workstation, its ability to control guidewire and catheter motion with precise calculated movements confers favorable patient outcomes, while the inherent reduction in radiation exposure and ergonomic stress reduces occupational hazards for the surgeon. Nonetheless, the endovascular robotic transformation is not poised to stop there. Novel technological advances in shape memory alloys and fiber Bragg grating sensors have already set the stage for future endovascular robotic design.
Endovascular robotics remains on the cutting edge of surgical technology. Although further investigations are necessary to succinctly outline the indications and applications, the benefits and future potential are clear.
KeywordsRobotic endovascular surgery Robotic vascular surgery Vascular robotics Endovascular robotics Robot-assisted vascular surgery CorPath
Compliance with Ethical Guidelines
Conflict of interest
Ahmed K. Ghamraoui and Joseph J. Ricotta II declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Indes JE, Pfaff MJ, Farrokhyar F, Brown H, Hashim P, Cheung K, et al. Clinical outcomes of 5358 patients undergoing direct open bypass or endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Therapy. 2013;20(4):443–55. https://doi.org/10.1583/13-4242.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ricotta JJ. Endovascular intravascular robotics: ready for prime time. Endovasc Today. 2015;14(8):77–80.Google Scholar
- 5.Andreassi MG, Piccaluga E, Guagliumi G, Del Greco M, Gaita F, Picano E. Occupational health risks in cardiac catheterization laboratory workers. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4):e003273. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.115.003273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Klein LW, Tra Y, Garratt KN, Powell W, Lopez-Cruz G, Chambers C, et al. Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(5):913–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1596–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Saliba W, Cummings JE, Oh S, Zhang Y, Mazgalev TN, Schweikert RA, et al. Novel robotic catheter remote control system: feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture and endocardial catheter navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(10):1102–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00556.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.• Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmar P, Deutschmann H, Hafner F, Rief P et al. Feasibility and safety of robotic peripheral vascular interventions: results of the RAPID Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2058–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.002. Feasibility study that resulted in FDA approval of Corindus CorPath for peripheral vascular interventions. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cochennec F, Kobeiter H, Gohel M, Marzelle J, Desgranges P, Allaire E, et al. Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Endovasc Therapy. 2015;22(2):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602815573228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Hamady M, Cheshire N. Tortuous iliac systems—a significant burden to conventional cannulation in the visceral segment: is there a role for robotic catheter technology? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(10):1369–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2012.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Weisz G. Robotic PCI technologies. Cardiac Interv Today. 2017;11(5):31–4.Google Scholar
- 33.Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M, Driesman M, Chu A, Patterson J, et al. Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(12):1704–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.•• Lu YH, Mani K, Panigrahi B, Hajari S, Chen CY. A shape memory alloy-based miniaturized actuator for catheter interventions. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018;9(3):405–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-018-0369-7.demonstrates feasibility of shape memory alloy guidewires in vascular model.
- 38.•• He C, Wang S, Zuo S. A linear stepping endovascular intervention robot with variable stiffness and force sensing. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(5):671–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1722-x. Demonstrates feasibility of robotic fiber Bragg grating force sensors in vascular model. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, Virmani N, Walker S, O’Malley M, et al. Electromagnetic tracking of flexible robotic catheters enables “assisted navigation” and brings automation to endovascular navigation in an in vitro study. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(4):1274–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Guo S, Wu J, Xiao N, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Li G et al., editors. A novel vibrating device for the interventional surgical Robotic System. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA); 2017 6–9 Aug. 2017.Google Scholar