Advertisement

Current Surgery Reports

, 6:16 | Cite as

How to Teach Surgical Residents during Damage Control Surgery

  • Lisa L. Schlitzkus
  • Brett H. Waibel
  • Paul J. Schenarts
Trauma Surgery (J. Diaz, Section Editor)
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Damage control can be difficult to teach. Residents have few operative trauma experiences. During damage control situations, the resident’s education may be lost in the stressful and fast, paced operating room due to patient care taking priority. Fortunately, there are numerous other opportunities to teach this important concept outside of the operating room.

Recent Findings

Damage control can be taught in a three step cycle from war games to intraoperative teaching during a crisis and ending with an after action review. This process is also applicable to other intraoperative crises and acute medical conditions such as a code event.

Summary

This manuscript describes multiple opportunities for education both in and outside the operating room when during the stressful moment, patient care takes priority.

Keywords

Damage control Resident education War games Intraoperative teaching After action review 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Guidelines

Conflict of interest

Lisa L. Schlitzkus, Brett H. Waibel, and Paul J. Schenarts declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Napolitano LM, Biester TW, Jurkovich GJ, Buyske J, Malangoni MA, Lewis FR Jr. Members of the Trauma, Burns and Critical Care Board of the American Board of Surgery. General surgery resident rotations in surgical critical care, trauma, and burns: what is optimal for residency training? Am J Surg. 2016;212(4):629–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The American Board of Surgery Booklet of Information Surgery. Available at https://www.absurgery.org/xfer/BookletofInfo-Surgery.pdf. Accessed on 9 Apr 2018.
  3. 3.
    Young JS, Dubose JE, Hedrick TL, Conaway MR, Nolley B. The use of “war games” to evaluate performance of students and residents in basic clinical scenarios: a disturbing analysis. J Trauma. 2007;63(3):556–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feanny MA, Scott BG, Mattox KL, Hirshberg A. Impact of the 80-hour work week on resident emergency operative experience. Am J Surg. 2005;190(6):947–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drake FT, Van Eaton EG, Huntington CR, Jurkovich GJ, Aarabi S, Gow KW. ACGME case logs: surgery resident experience in operative trauma for two decades. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1500–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammond J. Simulation in critical care and trauma education and training. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004;10(5):325–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hedrick TL, Young JS. The use of “war games” to enhance high-risk clinical decision-making in students and residents. Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):843–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlitzkus LL, Schenarts KD, Schenarts PJ. Is your residency program ready for Generation Y? J Surg Educ. 2010;67(2):108–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    •Tainter CR, Wong NL, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Bittner EA. The “Flipped Classroom” Model for Teaching in the Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2017;32(3):187–96. This pilot study provides a concise overview of the advantages of the flipped classroom.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tainter CR, Wong NL, Bittner EA. Innovative strategies in critical care education. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):550–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeffree RL, Clarke RM. Ten tips for teaching in the theatre tearoom: shifting the focus from teaching to learning. World J Surg. 2010;34:2518–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boor K, Scheele F, van der Vleuten CP, Teunissen PW, den Breejen EM, Scherpbier AJ. How undergraduate clinical learning climates differ: a multi-method case study. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):1029–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lake FR, Ryan G. Teaching on the run tips 2: educational guides for teaching in a clinical setting. Med J Aust. 2004;180:527–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eckstrom E, Homer L, Bowen JL. Measuring outcomes of a one-minute preceptor faculty development workshop. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:410–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Lifelong learning at work. BMJ. 2008;336:667–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spencer J, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ. 1999;318:1280–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mazmanian PE, Davis DA. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. JAMA. 2002;288:1057–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brigley S, Young Y, Littlejohns P, McEwen J. Continuing education for medical professionals: a reflective model. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73:23–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parsell G, Bligh J. Contract learning, clinical learning and clinicians. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72:284–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learner- centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med. 2003;78:893–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brookfield SD. Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parker SH, Flin R, McKinley A, Yule S. Factors influencing sturgeons’ intraoperative leadership: video analysis of unanticipated events in the operating room. World J of Surg. 2014;38(1):4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Doumouras AG, Engels PT. Early crisis nontechnical skill teaching in residency leads to long-term skill retention and improved performance during crises: a prospective, nonrandomized controlled study. Surgery. 2017;162(1):174–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ••Butvidas LD, Anderson CI, Balogh D, Basson MD. Disparities between resident and attending surgeon perceptions of intraoperative teaching. Am J Surg. 2011;201(3):385–9. This study compares attending and residents’ recall of positive and negative intraoperative teaching experiences and demonstrates that while each agree on the effectiveness of various methods, the frequency of these opportunities based on recall is highly variable.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vollmer CM Jr, Newman LR, Huang G, Irish J, Hurst J, Horvath K. Perspective on intraoperative teaching: divergence and convergence between learner and teacher. J Surg Educ. 2011;68:485–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rose JS, Waibel BH, Schenarts PJ. Disparity between resident and faculty surgeons’ perceptions of preoperative preparation, intraoperative teaching, and postoperative feedback. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(6):459–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cox SS, Swanson MS. Identification of teaching excellence in operating room and clinical settings. Am J Surg. 2002;183:251–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vikis EA, Mihalynuk TV, Pratt DD, Sidhu RS. Teaching and learning in the operating room is a two-way street: resident perceptions. Am J Surg. 2008;195(5):594–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Claridge JA, Calland JF, Chandrasekhara V, Young JS, Sanfey H, Schirmer BD. Comparing resident measurements to attending surgeon self-perceptions of surgical educators. Am J Surg. 2003;185:323–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A Leader’s Guide to After-Action Reviews. Training Circular 25-20, United States Army. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/army/tc_25-20/tc25-20.pdf Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  31. 31.
    Waibel BH, Rotondo MF. Damage control surgery: it’s evolution over the last 20 years. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39(4):314–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schwarz R. The “Sandwich Approach” Undermines Your Feedback. Harvard Business Review, April 19, 2013. https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-sandwich-approach-undermin. Accessed 9 Apr 2018. This article describes the failures of the “Sandwich Approach” and an alternative approach with a case scenario.
  33. 33.
    Von Bergen CW, Bressler MS, Campbell K. The sandwich feedback method: not very tasty. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/141831.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  34. 34.
    An Illustrated Guide to the Feedback Sandwich—Tasty or Bitter? http://www.businesszone.co.uk/blogs/knowledgetrain/project-management-21st-century/illustrated-guide-feedback-sandwich-tasty-or-bi. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.
  35. 35.
    Wood, A. The Feedback Sandwich—Tasty or Bitter? In: Project Community. May 7, 2013. Available at http://projectcommunityonline.com/the-feedback-sandwich-tasty-or-bitter.html. Accessed 9 Apr 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa L. Schlitzkus
    • 1
  • Brett H. Waibel
    • 1
  • Paul J. Schenarts
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of MedicineOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations