Current Surgery Reports

, 2:35

Use of Molecular Markers for Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules to Optimize Surgical Management

MINIMALLY INVASIVE ENDOCRINE SURGERY (H CHEN, SECTION EDITOR)
  • 374 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Minimally Invasive Endocrine Surgery

Abstract

The management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology has traditionally been diagnostic thyroidectomy. However most nodules are benign, and for nodules that demonstrate histologic malignancy, two-stage thyroidectomy may be necessary. Molecular markers have emerged as an adjunct to preoperative FNAB cytology evaluation that can improve diagnostic accuracy. In this review, we discuss the latest methodologies and review diagnostic performance parameters of recent molecular marker techniques.

Keywords

Thyroid nodule Thyroid cancer Thyroidectomy Molecular markers Mutation testing Indeterminate biopsy Surgical management MicroRNA Rearrangements 

Introduction

Ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) are the diagnostic tests currently used in thyroid nodule evaluation with the goal of accurately identifying malignancy. Thyroid cancer is rarely missed when cytology is classified as benign utilizing the six-tiered Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [1]. However, 20–25 % of FNAB cytology results are classified into one of the indeterminate Bethesda categories: atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), follicular neoplasm (FN) or suspicious for FN, and suspicious for malignancy [2]. In a recent meta-analysis of 4,212 nodules with cytohistological correlation, the risk of malignancy in the AUS/FLUS, FN, and suspicious categories was 16, 26, and 75 %, respectively [3]. Although repeat FNAB may be helpful in nodules with lower risk AUS/FLUS FNAB results, histology is often necessary for conclusive diagnosis.

Follicular-variant papillary thyroid cancer (FV-PTC) and follicular carcinoma (FTC) are the most common malignancies associated with indeterminate FNAB results [4••, 5, 6, 7], and both are difficult to diagnose even by histology [8, 9]. FTC requires capsular and/or vascular invasion, which is not readily apparent on FNAB cytology analysis. FVPTC is the second most common variant of PTC and is associated with the multifocal and heterogeneous distribution of the characteristic nuclear features (elongation, enlargement, chromatin clearing, intranuclear grooves, and inclusions) [9]. FVPTC is most frequently the source of false-negative FNAB cytology results and intraoperative frozen section analysis [10, 11]. To further complicate interpretation of diagnostic testing, interobserver variability is up to 30 % among expert thyroid pathologists [12].

Total or near-total thyroidectomy is the recommended definitive procedure for differentiated thyroid cancer >1 cm [2], which results in permanent hypothyroidism yet is associated with a low complication rate particularly when performed by high-volume surgeons [13, 14]. The alternative surgical approach is diagnostic lobectomy, which has a lower rate of postoperative morbidity and may preserve euthyroidism; however, completion thyroidectomy (i.e., two-stage surgery) is necessary if histologic cancer is confirmed.

To improve preoperative diagnostic discrimination within the indeterminate cytology category, a number of adjunct imaging modalities have been studied. Nodule features on US that are associated with malignancy include marked hypoechogenicity, taller-than-wide shape, microcalcifications, an irregular or spiculated margin, and mostly solid composition [15]. In a series of 180 indeterminate FNAB results with a high histologic malignancy rate of 51 %, the presence of ≥2 suspicious US features was associated with a 72 % risk of cancer [16]. On the other hand, 18F-FDG-PET/CT did not appear to add any diagnostic benefit in 56 nodules with indeterminate FNAB results and a 22 % malignancy rate [17]. Elastography uses US to quantify nodule compressibility by measuring shear wave propagation through the nodule [18], and it can identify malignancy with sensitivity of 80 % and specificity of 91 % [19]. Although this modality has not yet been tested in nodules with indeterminate FNAB cytology, its noninvasiveness is appealing for routine clinical use. Another noninvasive imaging technique is resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy (REIS), which measures electrical conductivity and capacitance differences in malignant compared to non-malignant adjacent tissue. In a recent pilot study, REIS was feasible and predicted malignant nodules with a sensitivity of 85 % and a modest specificity of 61 % [20]. However, additional study is still necessary before the technique's suitability for widespread use can be determined.

Frozen section evaluation has also been a traditional method of intraoperative pathologic evaluation in an attempt to achieve appropriate definitive initial surgery. However, with current high yield diagnostic testing including routine preoperative US-guided FNAB, the utility has diminished [21, 22], and it rarely productively alters surgical management [23]. Although practice patterns and some clinical scenarios may still direct its use, the diagnostic limitations and high costs do not support routine utilization during initial thyroid lobectomy [24, 25].

Molecular markers have emerged as a useful preoperative diagnostic adjunct, although there is currently no single test that can meet all three goals of preoperative nodule evaluation: (1) reliably identifying those nodules likely to be benign, (2) not missing significant malignancies, and (3) directing the optimal definitive initial surgical procedure.

Protein-Based Markers

Immunocytochemical (ICC) analysis of markers expressed in PTC can be helpful in risk stratifying indeterminate FNAB results, is less costly than other forms of marker testing, and uses resources that are readily available in any pathology laboratory. The three most commonly used markers are cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), galectin-3 (Gal-3), and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1), all of which have higher expression in differentiated thyroid cancers compared to benign lesions. In a recent meta-analysis, HBME-1 was the most studied ICC marker, although Gal-3 had the highest sensitivity (85 %) and specificity (90 %) for malignancy [26•]. Gal-3 as an adjunct to FNAB cytology was evaluated in a multi-institutional study including 465 FNAB samples that were classified as Thy3 (FN or suspected FN) by the British Thyroid Association Guidelines [27] with a 28 % malignancy rate [28]. False-negative staining occurred in 9 % and included FVPTC, FTC, oncocytic-variant FTC, and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer. False-positive staining occurred in 25 % with an overall accuracy of 88 % [28]. Thus, using Gal-3 ICC analysis alone to exclude cancer or guide surgery is likely insufficient.

Using panels with more than one marker may increase the utility of ICC. In a small series of 115 indeterminate FNAB specimens evaluated by HBME-1 and CK-19, there were no false-negative ICC results. However, four false-positive cases occurred, and specificity was 85 %. Moreover, inconclusive ICC results were obtained in 38 % of FNAB specimens, further limiting the described technique [29]. Additional limitations of ICC are that accurate results are reliant on obtaining enough cells by FNAB, and the test is best performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded preparations, which are not the current standard method for routine cytology smears used for diagnosis.

MicroRNA Expression Analysis

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small, non-coding, single-strand RNAs that can regulate gene expression. Dysregulation of miRNA has been associated with a number of human malignancies including leukemia, glioblastoma, breast cancer, and melanoma [30]. Differential miRNA expression can be seen in thyroid malignancies, is associated with histologic subtypes, may vary by tumor aggressiveness, and can be detected in FNAB specimens. miRNA expression patterns have been evaluated recently in FVPTC and FTC, the two histologies most often associated with indeterminate FNAB results. Dysregulation of miR-885-5p, -221, and -574-3p was identified in conventional and oncocytic FTC compared to normal thyroid tissue, and in a preliminary series of 19 FNAB specimens, analysis of these miRNAs was able to diagnose FTC with 100 % accuracy [31]. In another study of miRNA expression patterns using microarray analysis, FVPTC compared to classic PTC was characterized by dysregulation of miR-125a, -3p, -1271, and -153 [32].

miRNA analysis of thyroid lesions was evaluated by Nikiforova et al. [33] by initial screening of 62 benign and malignant thyroid lesions with an assay of 158 human miRNAs, and differential expression patterns were observed according to histology. Furthermore, varying patterns were present among histologic subtypes and in tumors with different oncogenic mutations. When 13 FNAB specimens were evaluated using a panel of seven selected miRNAs (miR-187, -221, -222, -146b, -155, -224, and -197) and expression patterns correlated to histology, upregulation of three or more miRNAs was predictive of malignancy with 100 % specificity, 88 % sensitivity, and 98 % accuracy [33]. miRNA expression that could further augment diagnostic FNAB analysis has been further explored in three studies (Table 1). Each of the studies (including the initial study by Nikiforova et al.) used a different miRNA panel, although miR-146b, miR-221, and miR-222 were evaluated in two of the three studies [34, 35, 36]. Thus far in these small studies, microRNA analysis shows some promise in improving preoperative diagnostic discrimination, but whether these markers will readily translate into cost-effective routine use remains to be seen in larger prospective studies.
Table 1

Analysis of miRNA expression patterns in indeterminate FNAB results

 

miRNA panel identified by screening?

miRNAs evaluated in FNAB specimens

No. of indeterminate FNAB specimens

Malignancy rate (%)

Spec

Sens

Acc

Keutgen et al. [35]

y

-222, -328, -197, -21

72

31

86

100

90

Shen et al. [34]

y

-146b, -221, -187, -30d

30a

37

78

89

85

Mazeh et al. [36]

n

-21, -31, -146b, -187, -221, -222

12

75

100

89

90

aOnly results in the atypia of undetermined significance were included in the study

Multigene Expression Panels

Identifying gene expression patterns to differentiate benign from malignant nodules has been another studied methodology with mixed results. In a novel approach, immunohistochemical analysis was used in 173 thyroid specimens to evaluate the protein expression of ten genes, and a three-gene panel with pronounced differential expression in malignant tumors (HMGA2, MRC2, SFN) was identified and analyzed in 95 FNAB specimens by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [37]. Indeterminate cytology was present in a subset of 27 FNAB specimens, and the three-gene panel predicted malignancy with 60 % sensitivity, 91 % NPV, 96 % specificity, and 75 % PPV [37].

To improve the NPV in of FNAB testing, >240,000 gene and exon transcripts were screened in 178 thyroid samples, and the expression of 167 genes was further identified as being able to reclassify nodules with indeterminate cytology as potentially benign. The initial validation cohort included only 24 indeterminate FNAB samples, and a specificity of 73 % and sensitivity of 100 % were observed [38]. The performance of the commercially available gene-expression classifier (GEC) was recently evaluated in a study of 265 nodules with indeterminate FNAB results and compared to histology [39••]. The rate of histologic malignancy was 32 %, and the panel had a sensitivity of 92 %, NPV 93 %, specificity 52 %, and PPV 47 %. A total of 7/85 (8 %) malignancies were missed by the GEC panel; 4 were papillary (size range 0.6–1.2 cm), 2 were FVPTC (size range 1–3 cm), and 1 was a 3.5-cm oncocytic carcinoma [39••]. In the subset of nodules with AUS/FLUS and FN cytology results, the NPV was 95 and 94 %, respectively. Thus, the GEC panel reduced but did not altogether eliminate the risk of malignancy. Furthermore, the panel did not decrease the malignancy risk to being equal to a benign FNAB result, which was 3.7 % in a meta-analysis with cytohistological correlation [3]. An unreliable NPV of 85 % was reported in nodules with suspicious FNAB results, precluding GEC use for nodules with these cytology results. Moreover, the overall high false-positive rate of 53 % prevents use of GEC results to help guide appropriate surgical management [39••].

Genetic Mutations and Rearrangements

The gene mutations and rearrangements frequently associated with thyroid cancer can be readily identified in FNAB specimens. The most commonly tested gene alterations are in the MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways, which have both been implicated in thyroid carcinogenesis, and activating mutations in both of these pathways lead to downstream upregulation of tumor-promoting and cancer progression genes [40]. Mutations correlate to histology (Table 2) and can provide additional preoperative risk stratification [40, 41, 42]. Interestingly, FVPTC, which has morphologic features more consistent with PTC but biologic behavior that is often similar to FTC, shares gene alterations with both histologic types.
Table 2

Gene alterations in thyroid cancer

Thyroid tumor

Mutations

Papillary thyroid cancer

 Conventional

BRAF V600E, RAS, RET/PTC, PTEN mutation (rare)

 Follicular variant

RAS, BRAF K601E, TSHR, PAX8-PPARG, RET/PTC (rare),

 Tall cell variant

BRAF V6000E

Follicular thyroid cancer

RAS, PTEN deletion or mutation, PIK3-CA, TSHR, PAX8-PPARG

Poorly differentiated thyroid cancer

BRAF V600E, p53, RAS, CTNNB1, PIK3CA

Anaplastic thyroid cancer

ALK, p53, CTNNB1, AKT1, PIK3CA, RAS, BRAF V600E, PTEN mutation

Medullary thyroid cancer, sporadic

RAS, RET

BRAF V600E is the most common gene alteration in thyroid carcinogenesis and can be associated with up to 40–50 % of conventional PTC. When detected in FNAB specimens, BRAF V600E has >99 % PPV for PTC and may also be associated with the tall-cell variant subtype, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, recurrence, and disease-specific mortality [42, 43••]. The additional prognostic information gained from preoperative BRAF V600E testing can help guide surgical management, including whether or not to perform prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection, but this remains controversial [44]. BRAF K601E is the second most common BRAF mutation identified in thyroid cancer, but is more likely to be associated with FVPTC. In a recent study evaluating characteristics of 120 BRAF-positive indeterminate FNAB results, BRAF K601E was detected in ~50 % of the results classified as AUS/FLUS or FN, and the majority were FVPTC on histology [45].

RAS mutations are the most common gene alterations identified in indeterminate FNAB specimens and can include point mutations in N-, K-, and H-RAS hotspots in codons 12/13 and 61 [4••]. In one recent study of 63 FNAB specimens, when RAS was detected in preoperative FNAB cytology, histologic malignancy was present in 80–85 % of the nodules, and included either FVPTC (90 %) or FTC (10 %) [46]. Lymph node metastasis was rare, but bilateral multifocal disease was diagnosed in 50 %.

Because of the number of gene alterations involved in thyroid carcinogenesis, testing for a panel of mutations rather than a single gene provides the best sensitivity for adjunct diagnostic testing. In the initial two studies evaluating gene testing of FNAB specimens by Cantara et al. [47] and Nikiforov et al. [48], mutations were identified in 45 and 29 %, respectively, of cytology results classified as indeterminate inclusive of the suspicious category, and molecular testing added significant diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy. Nikiforov et al. then reported results from prospective mutation testing (BRAF, RAS mutations and PAX8-PPARG, RET/PTC 1 and 3 rearrangements) of a separate, consecutive series of 513 indeterminate FNAB results with cytologic, molecular, and histologic correlation. The malignancy rate was 24 %, and false-positive mutation testing results were rare (11 %) [4••]. Regardless of cytology category, the risk of malignancy was 100 % when BRAF, RET/PTC1, 3, or PAX8-PPARG was detected preoperatively. RAS positivity was the primary source of the 9/83 (11 %) false-positive testing results and was identified in 73 % of the mutation positive FNAB specimens. Overall, for indeterminate FNAB results, the MT panel had sensitivity of 61 %, NPV 89 %, specificity 98 %, and PPV 89 % [4••]. The high PPV and specificity allow accurate identification of indeterminate FNAB results that carry a high risk of cancer, and can be used to guide the appropriate extent of initial thyroidectomy and/or lymphadenectomy.

The added diagnostic utility of prospective mutation testing has been demonstrated in hypothetical decision tree modeling, which also confirmed that the added costs of preoperative mutation testing were offset by a reduction in two-stage thyroidectomy [49]. Furthermore, in analysis of patient outcomes after incorporation of prospective mutation testing, a 2.5-fold reduction in two-stage thyroidectomy for histologic clinically significant thyroid cancer (p < 0.001) was observed when FNAB results classified as AUS/FLUS or FN underwent preoperative mutation testing [50].

Although the risk of malignancy is lower with mutation-negative FNAB results, the risk is not yet low enough to eliminate the risk of malignancy altogether. Indeterminate FNAB results with negative mutation testing results are still associated with a 14 % risk of cancer, although this rate varies by cytology category. Next generation sequencing technology may allow for facile and cost-effective screening of more relevant mutations, and has been investigated for thyroid neoplasms. Accurate testing is possible in both paraffin-embedded and FNAB samples with concordance to conventional Sanger sequencing methods [51]. Using the Ion Torrent platform and an expanded 12-gene panel that includes 284 mutational hotspots, Nikiforova et al. [52•] were able to detect mutations in genes such as TSHR, PIK3CA, and p53. In addition, 2/27 conventional PTCs were noted to have coexistent BRAF V600E with p53 and/or PIK3CA, which are mutations more likely associated with aggressive variants. The identification of such multiple mutations may provide additional preoperative prognostic information that may further help guide surgical management.

A multimodality approach to thyroid nodule evaluation will likely lead to further improvements in preoperative risk stratification. For example, TSHR mRNA can be detected in peripheral blood and may be a marker of malignancy, particularly for FNAB results classified as FN. An elevated TSHR mRNA level >1 ng/μg was associated with 85 % accuracy in a study of 54 patients [53]. However, in an algorithm that also incorporated the nodule size (<3.5 cm or ≥3.5 cm) and number of suspicious US characteristics (hypervascularity, microcalcifications, irregular shape, and indistinct margins), the preoperative diagnostic discrimination using TSH mRNA increased to 91 % accuracy, 97 % sensitivity, 95 % NPV, 84 % specificity, and 88 % PPV [53]. In yet another study evaluating 230 FNAB samples classified as AUS/FLUS with negative mutation testing, there were no observed malignancies in 88 nodules <1.8 cm [54]. Whether or not combining different molecular tests selected according to high- and low-risk nodule features will also improve current algorithms remains also to be determined [40].

Conclusions

Molecular testing of indeterminate FNAB cytology augments diagnostic accuracy and improves thyroid nodule risk stratification. Current testing modalities cannot yet reliably exclude thyroid cancer and avoid missed malignancies; however, a variety of tests with high specificity are available that can help direct initial extent of surgery. Further studies are still needed with new techniques and multimodality algorithms that will allow discrimination of low- and high-risk nodules with indeterminate cytology and further optimize clinical decision-making.

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Linwah Yip has received grant funding from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, Rosai J, Merino MJ, Randolph G, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(6):425–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid N, Differentiated Thyroid C, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(4):333–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Carty SE, LeBeau SO, Ferris RL, et al. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):3390–7. This is the largest series of indeterminate FNABs prospectively evaluated with molecular diagnostic testing for a panel of genes and rearrangements, and test performance parameters are reported. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lew JI, Snyder RA, Sanchez YM, Solorzano CC. Fine needle aspiration of the thyroid: correlation with final histopathology in a surgical series of 797 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):188–94 (discussion 94–95).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith M, Pantanowitz L, Khalbuss WE, Benkovich VA, Monaco SE. Indeterminate pediatric thyroid fine needle aspirations: a study of 68 cases. Acta Cytol. 2013;57(4):341–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teixeira GV, Chikota H, Teixeira T, Manfro G, Pai SI, Tufano RP. Incidence of malignancy in thyroid nodules determined to be follicular lesions of undetermined significance on fine-needle aspiration. World J Surg. 2012;36(1):69–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suster S. Thyroid tumors with a follicular growth pattern: problems in differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(7):984–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Follicular neoplasms of the thyroid: view, biases, and experiences. Adv Anat Pathol. 2004;11(6):279–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Casey MB, Lam KY, Lohse CM, Asa SL, et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(10):1336–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehanna R, Murphy M, McCarthy J, O’Leary G, Tuthill A, Murphy MS, et al. False negatives in thyroid cytology: impact of large nodule size and follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1305–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elsheikh TM, Asa SL, Chan JK, DeLellis RA, Heffess CS, LiVolsi VA, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation among experts in the diagnosis of thyroid follicular lesions with borderline nuclear features of papillary carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(5):736–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Powe NR, Gordon TA, Udelsman R. The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 1998;228(3):320–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loyo M, Tufano RP, Gourin CG. National trends in thyroid surgery and the effect of volume on short-term outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(8):2056–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation: multicenter retrospective study. Radiology. 2008;247(3):762–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendez W, Rodgers SE, Lew JI, Montano R, Solorzano CC. Role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in predicting malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2487–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deandreis D, Al Ghuzlan A, Auperin A, Vielh P, Caillou B, Chami L, et al. Is (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT useful for the presurgical characterization of thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine needle aspiration cytology? Thyroid. 2012;22(2):165–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sebag F, Vaillant-Lombard J, Berbis J, Griset V, Henry JF, Petit P, et al. Shear wave elastography: a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(12):5281–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veyrieres JB, Albarel F, Lombard JV, Berbis J, Sebag F, Oliver C, et al. A threshold value in Shear Wave elastography to rule out malignant thyroid nodules: a reality? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3965–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng B, Tublin ME, Klym AH, Gur D. Classification of thyroid nodules using a resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy: a preliminary assessment. Thyroid. 2013;23(7):854–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin HS, Komisar A, Opher E, Blaugrund SM. Follicular variant of papillary carcinoma: the diagnostic limitations of preoperative fine-needle aspiration and intraoperative frozen section evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(9):1431–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCoy KL, Carty SE, Armstrong MJ, Seethala RR, Ohori NP, Kabaker AS, et al. Intraoperative pathologic examination in the era of molecular testing for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):546–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen H, Nicol TL, Udelsman R. Follicular lesions of the thyroid. Does frozen section evaluation alter operative management? Ann Surg. 1995;222(1):101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Udelsman R, Westra WH, Donovan PI, Sohn TA, Cameron JL. Randomized prospective evaluation of frozen-section analysis for follicular neoplasms of the thyroid. Ann Surg. 2001;233(5):716–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zanocco K, Heller M, Elaraj D, Sturgeon C. Cost effectiveness of intraoperative pathology examination during diagnostic hemithyroidectomy for unilateral follicular thyroid neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):702–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • de Matos LL, Del Giglio AB, Matsubayashi CO, de Lima Farah M, Del Giglio A, da Silva Pinhal MA. Expression of CK-19, galectin-3 and HBME-1 in the differentiation of thyroid lesions: systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:97. This article evaluates the three most commonly studied protein markers used in thyroid nodule diagnostics. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Physicians BTARCo. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer, 2nd Edition. 2007.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bartolazzi A, Orlandi F, Saggiorato E, Volante M, Arecco F, Rossetto R, et al. Galectin-3-expression analysis in the surgical selection of follicular thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytology: a prospective multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(6):543–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cochand-Priollet B, Dahan H, Laloi-Michelin M, Polivka M, Saada M, Herman P, et al. Immunocytochemistry with cytokeratin 19 and anti-human mesothelial cell antibody (HBME1) increases the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspirations: preliminary report of 150 liquid-based fine-needle aspirations with histological control. Thyroid. 2011;21(10):1067–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mazeh H. MicroRNA as a diagnostic tool in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Oncologist. 2012;17(8):1032–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dettmer M, Vogetseder A, Durso MB, Moch H, Komminoth P, Perren A, et al. MicroRNA expression array identifies novel diagnostic markers for conventional and oncocytic follicular thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(1):E1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dettmer MS, Perren A, Moch H, Komminoth P, Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN. Comprehensive microRNA expression profiling identifies novel markers in follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2013;23(11):1383–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nikiforova MN, Tseng GC, Steward D, Diorio D, Nikiforov YE. MicroRNA expression profiling of thyroid tumors: biological significance and diagnostic utility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1600–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shen R, Liyanarachchi S, Li W, Wakely PE Jr, Saji M, Huang J, et al. MicroRNA signature in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology applied to “atypia of undetermined significance” cases. Thyroid. 2012;22(1):9–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Keutgen XM, Filicori F, Crowley MJ, Wang Y, Scognamiglio T, Hoda R, et al. A panel of four miRNAs accurately differentiates malignant from benign indeterminate thyroid lesions on fine needle aspiration. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(7):2032–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mazeh H, Levy Y, Mizrahi I, Appelbaum L, Ilyayev N, Halle D, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules using micro ribonucleic acid amplification in residual cells obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):216–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Prasad NB, Kowalski J, Tsai HL, Talbot K, Somervell H, Kouniavsky G, et al. Three-gene molecular diagnostic model for thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2012;22(3):275–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chudova D, Wilde JI, Wang ET, Wang H, Rabbee N, Egidio CM, et al. Molecular classification of thyroid nodules using high-dimensionality genomic data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(12):5296–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    •• Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(8):705–15. This article describes the results from a multicenter study comparing gene expression classifier results to histologic findings in nodules with indeterminate FNAB. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xing M. Molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(3):184–99.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Romei C, Elisei R. RET/PTC translocations and clinico-pathological features in human papillary thyroid carcinoma. Front Endocrinol. 2012;3:54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN. Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(10):569–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    •• Xing M, Alzahrani AS, Carson KA, Viola D, Elisei R, Bendlova B, et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. JAMA. 2013;309(14):1493–501. A large multiinstitutional and international study of patients with BRAF V600E-positive PTC demonstrating associations between BRAF-positivity and disease-related mortality. Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Howell GM, Nikiforova MN, Carty SE, Armstrong MJ, Hodak SP, Stang MT, et al. BRAF V600E mutation independently predicts central compartment lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(1):47–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ohori NP, Singhal R, Nikiforova MN, Yip L, Schoedel KE, Coyne C, et al. BRAF mutation detection in indeterminate thyroid cytology specimens: underlying cytologic, molecular, and pathologic characteristics of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(4):197–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gupta N, Dasyam AK, Carty SE, Nikiforova MN, Ohori NP, Armstrong M, et al. RAS mutations in thyroid FNA specimens are highly predictive of predominantly low-risk follicular-pattern cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):E914–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cantara S, Capezzone M, Marchisotta S, Capuano S, Busonero G, Toti P, et al. Impact of proto-oncogene mutation detection in cytological specimens from thyroid nodules improves the diagnostic accuracy of cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1365–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nikiforov YE, Steward DL, Robinson-Smith TM, Haugen BR, Klopper JP, Zhu Z, et al. Molecular testing for mutations in improving the fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(6):2092–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yip L, Farris C, Kabaker AS, Hodak SP, Nikiforova MN, McCoy KL, et al. Cost impact of molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration biopsies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):1905–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yip L, Armstrong MJ, Silbermann A, McCoy KL, Stang MT, et al. A clinical algorithm for fine-needle aspiration molecular testing effectively guides the appropriate extent of initial thyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 2013. (accepted).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hadd AG, Houghton J, Choudhary A, Sah S, Chen L, Marko AC, et al. Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15(2):234–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    • Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Roy S, Durso MB, Nikiforov YE. Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2013. First study to use next generation sequencing to concisely perform multigene testing, and demonstrate feasibility of expanded gene panel testing.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Milas M, Shin J, Gupta M, Novosel T, Nasr C, Brainard J, et al. Circulating thyrotropin receptor mRNA as a novel marker of thyroid cancer: clinical applications learned from 1758 samples. Ann Surg. 2010;252(4):643–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mehta RS Carty SE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Coyne C, LeBeau SO, et al. Nodule size is an independent predictor of malignancy in mutation-negative nodules with follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology. Surgery. 2013;154(4):730–6; discussion 736–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Endocrine Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations