Advertisement

Role of Frailty and Comorbidity in Determination of Operability for Patients With Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Erik T. Interval
  • Nicholas Whitenack
  • Aru PanwarEmail author
HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer (W Lydiatt, Section Editor)
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer
  2. Topical Collection on HEAD & NECK: Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To review the role of frailty and comorbidities in determining operability and associated outcomes in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Recent Findings

Frailty and comorbidity have been linked to multiple adverse outcome measures including risk of mortality, surgical complications, length of stay, intensity of care needs, discharge disposition, risk of readmission, and cost of healthcare delivery. There are diverse objective and validated measures of comorbidity and frailty. Addition of comorbidity and objective frailty measurements has been demonstrated to improve predictive power of nomograms and clinical staging systems for patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The use of predictive tools that assess frailty may contribute to shared decision making, realistic expectations, and facilitation of appropriate level of care. While emerging literature supports the role of prehabilitation, there is paucity of data in support of such interventions for patients afflicted by oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Summary

Frailty assesses operability beyond anatomic resectability and incorporates key determinants of physical, nutritional, and cognitive well-being. Objective measurements of frailty predict meaningful outcomes following surgery for cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx. This paper suggests that clinicians should objectively and routinely assess frailty, which may facilitate patient counseling, improved risk stratification, informed decision making, and further research to elucidate relationship of frailty with outcomes in head and neck specific populations.

Keywords

Frailty Outcomes Comorbidity Head and neck cancer Oral cancer Oropharyngeal cancer 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    He W, Goodkind D, Kowal PR. An aging world: 2015. 2016. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/demo/P95-16-1.html. Accessed 15 June 2018.
  2. 2.
    Muss HB. Cancer in the elderly: a societal perspective from the United States. Clin Oncol. 2009;21:92–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2008.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–56.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeber JE, Copeland LA, Hosek BJ, Karnad AB, Lawrence VA, Sanchez-Reilly SE. Cancer rates, medical comorbidities, and treatment modalities in the oldest patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;67:237–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Partridge JSL, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing. 2012;41:142–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCarter K, Baker AL, Britton B, Wolfenden L, Wratten C, Bauer J, et al. Smoking, drinking, and depression: comorbidity in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Cancer Med. 2018;7:2382–90.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Argiris A, Brockstein BE, Haraf DJ, Stenson KM, Mittal BB, Kies MS, et al. Competing causes of death and second primary tumors in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1956–62.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beynon RA, Lang S, Schimansky S, Penfold CM, Waylen A, Thomas SJ, et al. Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking at diagnosis of head and neck cancer and all-cause mortality: results from head and neck 5000, a prospective observational cohort of people with head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:1114–27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paleri V, Narayan R, Wight RG. Descriptive study of the type and severity of decompensation caused by comorbidity in a population of patients with laryngeal squamous cancer. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:517–21.  https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215041615281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:24–35.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0912217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dahlstrom KR, Bell D, Hanby D, Li G, Wang L-E, Wei Q, et al. Socioeconomic characteristics of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma according to tumor HPV status, patient smoking status, and sexual behavior. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:832–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/, based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018.
  13. 13.
    Genther DJ, Gourin CG. Effect of comorbidity on short-term outcomes and cost of care after head and neck cancer surgery in the elderly. Head Neck. 2015;37:685–93.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ragin CCR, Taioli E. Survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to human papillomavirus infection: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1813–20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dayyani F, Etzel CJ, Liu M, Ho C-H, Lippman SM, Tsao AS. Meta-analysis of the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on cancer risk and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-2-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hubbard RE, Story DA. Patient frailty: the elephant in the operating room. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(Suppl 1):26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Syddall H, Cooper C, Martin F, Briggs R, Aihie Sayer A. Is grip strength a useful single marker of frailty? Age Ageing. 2003;32:650–6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afg111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hwang K, Lee JP, Yoo SY, Kim H. Relationships of comorbidities and old age with postoperative complications of head and neck free flaps: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1627–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saçak B, Akdeniz ZD, Certel F, Kocaaslan FND, Tuncer B, Çelebiler Ö. Risk assessment for free tissue transfers: is old age a determining factor? J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:856–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erichsen JE. Causes of death after operations. In: The science and art of surgery, being a treatise on surgical injuries, diseases, and operations, 2nd ed. September 1856.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robinson TN, Walston JD, Brummel NE, Deiner S, Brown CH 4th, Kennedy M, et al. Frailty for surgeons: review of a National Institute on Aging Conference on Frailty for Specialists. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:1083–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183:104–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173:489–95.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    ACS Risk Calculator—Home Page. https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/. Accessed 17 Jun 2018.
  28. 28.
    Piccirillo JF. Importance of comorbidity in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2010;125:2242–602.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200004000-00011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Piccirillo JF, Lacy PD, Basu A, Spitznagel EL. Development of a new head and neck cancer-specific comorbidity index. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1172–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.10.1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Habbous S, Chu KP, Harland LTG, la Delfa A, Fadhel E, Sun B, et al. Validation of a one-page patient-reported Charlson comorbidity index questionnaire for upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2013;49:407–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, Burchenal JH. Karnofsky Palliative Performance Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. 1948.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t60198-000.
  32. 32.
    Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–56.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JSM, Olde Rikkert MGM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10:104–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:738–43.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.7.738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Theou O, Brothers TD, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Operationalization of frailty using eight commonly used scales and comparison of their ability to predict all-cause mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1537–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dedivitis RA, Castro MA, Aires FT, Bohn-Pfuetzenreiter NP, Pfuetzenreiter EG, Ribeiro DA. Comorbidity measurement in patients with oral cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:P151–2 Presentation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Paleri V, Wight RG, Silver CE, Haigentz M Jr, Takes RP, Bradley PJ, et al. Comorbidity in head and neck cancer: a critical appraisal and recommendations for practice. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:712–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.•
    Nieman CL, Pitman KT, Tufaro AP, Eisele DW, Frick KD, Gourin CG. The effect of frailty on short-term outcomes after head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:102–10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26735 This is a retrospective review which assesses frailty, utilizing the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator, in a large national database of head and neck cancer patients. The authors show that 7.4% of the patients are frail, and frailty is associated with discharge disposition, in-hospital death, complications, length of stay, and cost. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hollenbeak CS, Kulaylat AN, Mackley H, Koch W, Schaefer EW, Goldenberg D. Determinants of Medicare costs for elderly patients with oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141:628–35.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abt NB, Richmon JD, Koch WM, Eisele DW, Agrawal N. Assessment of the predictive value of the modified frailty index for Clavien-Dindo grade IV critical care complications in major head and neck cancer operations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:658–64.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen MM, Orosco RK, Harris JP, Porter JB, Rosenthal EL, Hara W, et al. Predictors of readmissions after head and neck cancer surgery: a national perspective. Oral Oncol. 2017;71:106–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baskin RM, Zhang J, Dirain C, Lipori P, Fonseca G, Sawhney R, et al. Predictors of returns to the emergency department after head and neck surgery. Head Neck. 2018;40:498–511.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cramer JD, Patel UA, Samant S, Shintani Smith S. Discharge destination after head and neck surgery: predictors of discharge to postacute care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;155:997–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816661514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.•
    Wachal B, Johnson M, Burchell A, Sayles H, Rieke K, Lindau R, et al. Association of modified frailty index score with perioperative risk for patients undergoing total laryngectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143:818–23.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0412 This is a retrospective study of NSQIP data for patients who underwent total laryngectomy. The index utilized was the modified frailty index. An MFI score of 3 or higher had a higher rate of complications, and frail status was predictive of length of stay and discharge disposition. Interestingly, most patients (84.3%) had an MFI of 2 or less, suggesting that many frail patients are being selected against laryngectomy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Joo Y-H, Cho K-J, Park J-O, Kim S-Y, Kim M-S. Surgical morbidity and mortality in patients after microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43:502–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    • Adams P, Ghanem T, Stachler R, Hall F, Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I. Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:783–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3969 This is a retrospective study using the NSQIP database evaluating the impact of frailty on morbidity and mortality of head and neck cancer patients. Patients with an mFI of 4 out of 11 or higher had an increase in mortality from 0.2 to 11.9%. Similarly, complications were also shown to increase with increasing frail score. This study thereby provides more data regarding the impact of frailty on morbidity and mortality. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Szturz P, Vermorken JB. Treatment of elderly patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Front Oncol. 2016;6:199.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baijal G, Gupta T, Hotwani C, Laskar SG, Budrukkar A, Murthy V, et al. Impact of comorbidity on therapeutic decision-making in head and neck cancer: audit from a comprehensive cancer center in India. Head Neck. 2012;34:1251–4.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen J-H, Yen Y-C, Yang H-C, Liu SH, Yuan SP, Wu LL, et al. Curative-intent aggressive treatment improves survival in elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high comorbidity index. Medicine. 2016;95:e3268.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Juarez JE, Choi J, St John M, Abemayor E, TenNapel M, Chen AM. Patterns of care for elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:767–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Corrêa GTB, Bandeira GA, Cavalcanti BG, Santos FBG, Rodrigues Neto JFR, Guimarães ALS, et al. Analysis of ECOG performance status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: association with sociodemographical and clinical factors, and overall survival. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:2679–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1386-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Omura G, Ando M, Saito Y, Kobayashi K, Yamasoba T, Asakage T. Comorbidity as predictor poor prognosis for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with major surgery. Head Neck. 2016;38:364–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang JR, Habbous S, Espin-Garcia O, Chen D, Huang SH, Simpson C, et al. Comorbidity and performance status as independent prognostic factors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2016;38:736–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hathaway B, Johnson JT, Piccirillo JF, Snyderman CH, Wagner RL, Labriola S, et al. Chemoradiation for metastatic SCCA: role of comorbidity. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1893–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200111000-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Coatesworth AP, Tsikoudas A, MacLennan K. The cause of death in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116:269–71.  https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215021910726.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    de Cássia Braga Ribeiro K, Kowalski LP, de O Latorre M d RD. Perioperative complications, comorbidities, and survival in oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:219–28.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.2.219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pugliano FA, Piccirillo JF, Zequeira MR, Fredrickson JM, Perez CA, Simpson JR. Symptoms as an index of biologic behavior in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;120:380–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70279-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Amin MB, Edge S, Greene FL, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. Berlin: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Culié D, Benezery K, Chamorey E, Ettaiche M, Fernandez J, Poissonnet G, et al. Salvage surgery for recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: post-operative oncologic and functional outcomes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135:1323–9.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2015.1066935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    L’Esperance HE, Kallogjeri D, Yousaf S, Piccirillo JF, Rich JT. Prediction of mortality and morbidity in head and neck cancer patients 80 years of age and older undergoing surgery. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:871–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee C-C, Ho H-C, Su Y-C, Chen P-C, Yu C-H, Yang C-C. Comparison of different comorbidity measures for oral cancer patients with surgical intervention: a longitudinal study from a single cancer center. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016;43:322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Panwar A, Wang F, Lindau R, et al. Prediction of discharge destination following laryngectomy. Unpublished results, personal communication, 6/20/2018. 2018.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chaudhary H, Stewart CM, Webster K, Herbert RJ, Frick KD, Eisele DW, et al. Readmission following primary surgery for larynx and oropharynx cancer in the elderly. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:631–41.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Oozeer NB, Benbow J, Downs C, Kelly C, Welch A, Paleri V. The effect of comorbidity on quality of life during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:268–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Muller MJ, Heiligers MLCH, de Bree R, Aaronson NK, et al. Quality of life and functional status in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: pretreatment values of a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:651–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0249-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–81.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1011024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Thiagarajan S, Babu TPS, Chakraborthy S, Patil VM, Bhattacharjee A, Balasubramanian S. Head and neck cancer in geriatric patients: analysis of the pattern of care given at a tertiary cancer care center. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52:387–90.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.176734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Maggiore R, Zumsteg ZS, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Trevino KM, Gajra A, Korc-Grodzicki B, et al. The older adult with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: knowledge gaps and future direction in assessment and treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:868–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Porceddu SV, Haddad RI. Management of elderly patients with locoregionally confined head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e274–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30229-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.3.M255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Minnella EM, Carli F. Prehabilitation and functional recovery for colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:919–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cabilan CJ, Hines S, Munday J. The effectiveness of prehabilitation or preoperative exercise for surgical patients: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13:146–87.  https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, Carli F, Gramlich L, Culos-Reed N, et al. Effects of nutritional prehabilitation, with and without exercise, on outcomes of patients who undergo colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:391–410.e4.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Boujibar F, Bonnevie T, Debeaumont D, Bubenheim M, Cuvellier A, Peillon C, et al. Impact of prehabilitation on morbidity and mortality after pulmonary lobectomy by minimally invasive surgery: a cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:2240–8.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.03.161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    VanderWalde NA, Deal AM, Comitz E, Stravers L, Muss H, Reeve BB, et al. Geriatric assessment as a predictor of tolerance, quality of life, and outcomes in older patients with head and neck cancers and lung cancers receiving radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:850–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pottel L, Lycke M, Boterberg T, Pottel H, Goethals L, Duprez F, et al. Serial comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly head and neck cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy identifies evolution of multidimensional health problems and is indicative of quality of life. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;23:401–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Perri F, Ionna F, Pavone E, Longo F, Caponigro F. Treatment approaches in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Anti Cancer Agents Med Chem. 2013;13:1383–90.  https://doi.org/10.2174/18715206113136660355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Neve M, Jameson MB, Govender S, Hartopeanu C. Impact of geriatric assessment on the management of older adults with head and neck cancer: a pilot study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7:457–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2016.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    • Brugel L, Laurent M, Caillet P, Radenne A, Durand-Zaleski I, Martin M, et al. Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on survival, function, and nutritional status in elderly patients with head and neck cancer: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (EGeSOR). BMC Cancer. 2014;14:427.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-427 This is a large randomized trial of patients 70 years of age or older which is still collecting data. Once the results are out, this can provide much-needed high quality evidence on the benefit of a comprehensive geriatric assessment, involvement of a geriatrician on the team, and selection of who may benefit. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik T. Interval
    • 1
  • Nicholas Whitenack
    • 2
  • Aru Panwar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer CenterNebraska Methodist HospitalOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryCreighton University Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations