Advertisement

Current Ophthalmology Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 84–89 | Cite as

The Role of Systemic Risk Factors in Diabetic Retinopathy

  • Elizabeth AtchisonEmail author
  • Andrew Barkmeier
Open Access
Diabetic Retinopathy: Medical and Surgical Therapies (Jorge Fortun, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Diabetic Retinopathy: Medical and Surgical Therapies

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is an increasingly common medical issue in the United States. The risk of developing the disease or having the disease progress is caused by many systemic health factors. This article examines the existing literature on the links between glycemic control, arterial hypertension, high cholesterol and hyperlipidemia, obesity, inflammatory markers, sleep-disordered breathing, and exercise with risk of diabetic retinopathy development and prevention. The literature shows benefit for good glycemic and blood pressure control. The effects of cholesterol, and lipid control, inflammatory markers, sleep-disordered breathing, obesity, and exercise are less well established.

Keywords

Diabetic retinopathy Hypertension Obesity Cholesterol Exercise Sleep-disordered breathing 

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (diabetes) is a group of conditions in which elevation and dysregulation of blood glucose levels result from either decreased production of insulin or systemic resistance to insulin’s effects. It is a large health burden in the United States with over 22 million Americans (7 %) carrying the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus [1]. The prevalence of diabetes is expected to increase so that a quarter to a third of all Americans will be diabetic by 2050 [2]. The economic cost of treating diabetes is over 176 billion dollars a year in the United States, over 20 % of which is spent on the ophthalmic complications [1]. In 2005, there were an estimated 5.5 million people over the age of 40 with diabetic retinopathy, and this number is predicted to rise to 16 million by 2050. The corresponding numbers for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy were 1.2 million in 2005, and would be 3.4 million by 2050 [3].

Although there are an increasing number of treatments for diabetic retinopathy, the best method of minimizing its impact is prevention of ocular complications. Insulin resistance, which often precedes type 2 diabetes, is a component of the metabolic syndrome. Those with diabetes are more likely to have other components of the metabolic syndrome including abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, prothrombotic state, and a proinflammatory state [4]. Having one or more of these components of the metabolic syndrome has been associated with a higher risk of diabetic complications, including retinopathy [5].

Diabetes is a chronic condition and managing the disease can be a substantial burden to patients. Although primary care physicians and endocrinologists are at the forefront of managing the disease, ophthalmologists are in a unique position to help motivate patients to control their disease. The time of diagnosis of diabetic eye disease can be a pivotal moment in the patients’ lives. A threat of vision loss can be a critical wake-up call for patients to invest in habits that will maintain their overall health and the health of their eyes. Familiarity with how systemic health conditions impact diabetic eye disease can help the ophthalmologist educate patients on these habits. Such education at a critical moment can be the catalyst a patient needs to pursue lifelong healthier habits. This article examines the effects that these additional systemic health conditions and management have on diabetic eye disease.

Glycemic control

The effects of blood glucose control on the clinical course of diabetes have been well documented and those with well-controlled blood sugars are at significantly lower risk for microvascular complications [6]. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial, patients who were randomized to an intensive blood sugar control regimen with a target hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) level of <6.0 % had a significantly lower rate of progression for their diabetic retinopathy compared to those with a target level of 7.0–7.9 % (7.3 vs 10.4 % progression) [7]. This level of risk reduction was also found in a Cochrane Review on intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetics [8]. For every 10 % reduction in HbA1c, there is an associated 42 % decrease in the risk of retinopathy progression. For every 10 % increase in Hba1c, the risk of retinopathy progression increased by 64 % [9]. This study echoed previous studies, which also found a decreased retinopathy risk with tighter blood glucose control [10, 11]. The beneficial effects of tight blood glucose control appear to last for years as similarly managed patients in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Trial (EDIC) extension to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) had a significantly lower risk of retinopathy progression if they were previously randomized to intensive insulin therapy vs. conventional therapy (39 vs 56 % progression over 3 years) [12•].

Pancreas transplantation is a relatively new therapy for diabetes. It can have dramatic effects on blood sugars, with many patients achieving a euglycemic state. There have been case reports of stabilization and even regression of diabetic retinopathy after pancreas transplantation [13, 14].

Controversy has surrounded the potential ocular effects of thiazolidinediones, a class of medications used to control blood sugar. Systemically, they have been associated with peripheral edema refractory to diuretics and ophthalmologic case series have suggested that they may also contribute to diabetic macular edema [15, 16]. The ACCORD trial, however, included a pre-specified analysis comparing rates of macular edema with or without exposure to these drugs and saw no effect [17].

In summary, there is strong evidence that better glycemic control leads to a large reduction in the risk of development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Controversy remains regarding the ideal HbA1c target for diabetics. The ACCORD trial used a HbA1c goal <6.0 %, whereas the ADVANCE trial used a goal of <6.5 % [7]. The American Diabetes Association recommends a goal <7.0 %.

Arterial Hypertension

Hypertension is the most common modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the United States. About 20 % of adults under age 60 and 65 % of adults over 60 in the United States meet the criteria for diagnosis which is systolic blood pressure over 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure over 90 mmHg [18]. Diabetics are particularly susceptible to the effects of hypertension with respect to their risk for developing cardiovascular disease. There are multiple hypotheses for why this may be, with a combination of several being, most likely to represent the full picture. One mechanism implicates interactions between hormonal control of blood sugar levels and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) at multiple levels and in both directions; those with diabetes have elevation of the RAS leading to hypertension, and those with hypertension have increased rates of developing diabetes. Pharmacologic blockade of the RAS both reduces the risk of diabetes development in hypertensive patients and decreases the risk of hypertension in previously normotensive diabetics [19]. A meta-analysis showed that those on RAS inhibitors had about 7 % decreased risk of retinopathy , a 5 % decreased risk of progression of diabetic retinopathy, and an increased probability of regression of their diabetic retinopathy. The same meta-analysis showed that diabetics on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors had a statistically significant decreased risk of diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy progression, and an increased probability of regression. Interestingly, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were only associated with a decreased incidence of retinopathy [20].

The combination of diabetes and hypertension is associated with an increased mortality rate, largely due to cardiovascular disease. Diabetics with adequate blood pressure control have only 70 % risk of mortality and those with poorly controlled hypertension have almost double the risk of death from cardiovascular disease as those diabetics with good blood pressure control [21]. Not surprisingly, having both hypertension and diabetes increases a patient’s risk of retinal disease. Studies have shown that the relative risk of diabetic retinopathy for diabetics also having hypertension is 1.7 [21, 22, 23]. One study found that for every 10 mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure, there was a 1.23 times increased risk of diabetic retinopathy and 1.19 times increased risk of vision-threatening retinopathy [24]. Interestingly, the same study identified a decreased risk profile with increasing diastolic blood pressure. For every 10 mmHg increase in diastolic blood pressure, there was a 0.71 relative risk of diabetic retinopathy and 0.65 relative risk of vision-threatening retinopathy [24]. Effective treatment of hypertension (goal blood pressure less than 150/85) has been shown to reduce the rate of worsening of diabetic retinopathy by 34 % over 7.5 years [22, 25]. Additionally, such efforts at decreasing blood pressure in hypertensive diabetics lowered the risk of vision loss of three lines or more by 47 %. A Cochrane Review found that there was a beneficial effect on treatment of elevated blood pressure to prevent diabetic retinopathy but not for slowing its progression [26]. Notably, the ACCORD trial did not find a significant difference in the rates of diabetic retinopathy progression between those undergoing intensive blood pressure control (goal systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg) and standard management (goal <140 mmHg).

Control of blood pressure to a level of <140/90 is recommended under the Joint National Committee 8 regulations [27]. Best current evidence from the ophthalmology literature does not suggest any benefit to altering this recommendation for patients with confirmed diabetic retinopathy.

High Cholesterol and Hyperlipidemia

Elevated serum cholesterol and lipid levels are a known component of the metabolic syndrome. Their well-documented link to cardiovascular events and cardiovascular deaths, as well as the beneficial effects of intervention on these risk factors, has led to regular primary care dyslipidemia screening for diabetic patients. Studies have linked elevated serum cholesterol and lipid levels to an increased risk of long-term vision loss in diabetic retinopathy. One study found an average baseline cholesterol level of 244 in those who had a persistent drop in vision to 5/200 or worse compared to 228 in those who did not develop such loss [28].

In a large meta-analysis, diabetics with macular edema have been found to have higher levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, and serum triglycerides [29••]. Elevated cholesterol and lipid levels have also been linked to higher rates of hard retinal exudates. Compared to those with a cholesterol level <200 mg/dL, those with a cholesterol level ≥240 mg/dL were twice as likely to have hard retinal exudates. A similar doubling of risk was seen for those with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL compared to those with <130 mg/dL. There was a slightly more modest effect in those with very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of >61 mg/dL—1.84 times in terms of the risk compared to those with <18 mg/dL [28]. The effects of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides in this study were modest and not statistically significant. Other studies have not found an effect of cholesterol on risk of diabetic eye disease [24, 30].

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are a common treatment for high cholesterol. Interestingly, their use prior to diabetes diagnosis has been associated with a significantly decreased rate of development of diabetic retinopathy [31] and its use in patients with existing retinopathy has been linked to better average visual acuity improvement [32]. Fibrates are another class of medications used to treat hyperlipidemia. In the ACCORD trial, those placed on a fenofibrate had a lower rate of progression of diabetic retinopathy (6.5 vs 10.2 %) [7]. Another study also found that those on a fenofibrate had a lower rate of chance of needing laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy than those on a placebo [33].

Control of serum cholesterol and lipids is associated with a lower rate of complications from diabetic eye disease. Monitoring and treatment of serum lipids to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) guidelines of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL is a reasonable goal [34]. Fibrate medications may offer additional retinal benefits for diabetic patients and further investigation is warranted regarding the ideal role for these drugs in managing patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Obesity

There is a strong link between obesity and diabetes. Those with class 3 obesity (body mass index >40) have a 5 times higher chance of developing diabetes than normal weight individuals [35].

Increased body mass index has been linked to an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy [36]. However, not all studies have confirmed an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy in obese diabetics or those with a higher body mass index. Some studies have even found the reverse to be true, that body mass index and obesity have a protective effect [37, 38, 39]. There has been suggestion that the link between body mass index and diabetic retinopathy may be clouded by inclusion of those with type 1 or juvenile diabetes, who likely have a different metabolic risk profile [37].

The waist-to-hip ratio has been identified as a marker for abdominal obesity and has been linked to significantly higher rates of diabetic retinopathy [40, 41]. In one study, those in the highest tertile of waist-to-hip ratio had 40 times the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy. Interestingly, even increased neck and waist circumference have been linked to both increased risk of and higher severity of diabetic retinopathy [41].

Obesity is an integral part of the metabolic syndrome and weight management should be encouraged in diabetics. The effect of bariatric surgery on diabetic retinopathy is not yet fully defined but appears to be unpredictable and may even be associated with worsening of existing diabetic retinopathy after surgery [42, 43].

Inflammatory markers

Inflammatory markers have been associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer. They have also been associated with diabetic retinopathy. Those with both mild and severe diabetic retinopathy were shown to have significantly higher levels of CRP than their diabetic counterparts without diabetic retinopathy [36, 44]. Elevated CRP has been associated with elevated risk of clinically significant macular edema and retinal hard exudates [39, 44]. Although currently there are no recommendations for monitoring systemic inflammatory markers in diabetics, this represents an interesting area for future research.

Sleep-disordered breathing

Sleep-disordered breathing or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repeated upper airway obstructions leading to blood oxygen desaturation and sleep disruption. It is highly related to obesity and is an increasingly recognized source of morbidity. In one study, 86 % of obese diabetic patients qualified for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea on overnight oximetry monitoring [45]. The intermittent hypoxia associated with OSA has been linked to oxidative stress at the endothelial level leading to vascular dysfunction and angiogenesis [46]. It is not surprising then that OSA has been associated with a higher rate of diabetic retinopathy [47, 48]. Makers of more severe OSA have also been linked to higher rates of neovascularization of the angle in those with diabetic retinopathy [49]. Studies have not found a link between sleep-disordered breathing and macular edema [50]; however, it has been linked to poor response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents [51••].

Exercise

There are known metabolic advantages to physical activity. It is not surprising then that an increase of 10 min a day in moderate to vigorous activity was associated with a 75 % reduction in risk of developing diabetic retinopathy and an increase of 20 min is associated with a 94 % reduction for women [52]. This study did not find a statistically significant effect for men. A study of how people used their leisure time found an effect of both the intensity of leisure time activity and how often physical activity leisure time occured. Low intensity leisure time physical activity was associated with a 1.49 times higher risk of diabetic retinopathy. Low-frequency leisure time physical activity is associated with a 2.58 increased rate of diabetic retinopathy [53]. Current physical activity recommendations for adult Americans are 150 min of at least moderate physical activity every week.

Conclusion

In conclusion, patients’ risks of diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy progression are dramatically affected by his or her overall systemic health. This underscores the importance of open communication with primary care providers to ensure that these health issues are being addressed. It also highlights the opportunity ophthalmologists and other eye care provers have to educate patients about the importance of overall good health and potentially provide additional motivation to strive for better management of other systemic health concerns.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by unrestricted grants from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc, New York.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Disclosure

Elizabeth Atchison and Andrew Barkmeier declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Economic costs of diabetes in the. U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):1033–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, et al. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010;8:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saaddine JB, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, et al. Projection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005–2050. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1740–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program. (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa LA, Canani LH, Lisboa HR, et al. Aggregation of features of the metabolic syndrome is associated with increased prevalence of chronic complications in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2004;21(3):252–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Davis MD, et al. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(3):233–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hemmingsen B, Lund SS, Gluud C, et al. Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:008143.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44(8):968–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(4):647–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reichard P, Nilsson BY, Rosenqvist U. The effect of long-term intensified insulin treatment on the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(5):304–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Lachin JM, White NH, Hainsworth DP, et al. Effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes: 18 years of follow-up in the DCCT/EDIC. Diabetes 2015;64(2):631–42. This is a continuation of the landmark Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, which established the lower rate of microvascular complications for intensive glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Previous follow up studies showed the effect of “metabolic memory” where the effects of the intensive glucose management persisted through 10 years of follow up. This extension showed that 18 years after the trial both groups have the same yearly incidence of diabetic microvascular complications, likely due to better glycemic control in the former conventional treatment group.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearce IA, Ilango B, Sells RA, Wong D. Stabilisation of diabetic retinopathy following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(7):736–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shipman KE, Patel CK. The effect of combined renal and pancreatic transplantation on diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:531–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colucciello M. Vision loss due to macular edema induced by rosiglitazone treatment of diabetes mellitus. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(9):1273–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryan EH Jr, Han DP, Ramsay RC, et al. Diabetic macular edema associated with glitazone use. Retina. 2006;26(5):562–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ambrosius WT, Danis RP, Goff DC Jr, et al. Lack of association between thiazolidinediones and macular edema in type 2 diabetes: the ACCORD eye substudy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(3):312–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Navar-Boggan AM, Pencina MJ, Williams K, et al. Proportion of US adults potentially affected by the 2014 hypertension guideline. JAMA. 2014;311(14):1424–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou MS, Schulman IH. Prevention of diabetes in hypertensive patients: results and implications from the VALUE trial. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5(1):361–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang B, Wang F, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of RAS inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(4):263–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walraven I, Mast MR, Hoekstra T, et al. Real-world evidence of suboptimal blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2015;33:2091–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raum P, Lamparter J, Ponto KA, et al. Prevalence and cardiovascular associations of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy: Results from the Gutenberg Health Study. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong TY, Cheung N, Tay WT, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1869–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zheng Y, Lamoureux EL, Lavanya R, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in migrant Indians in an urbanized society in Asia: the Singapore Indian eye study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):2119–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jin P, Peng J, Zou H, et al. A five-year prospective study of diabetic retinopathy progression in chinese type 2 diabetes patients with “well-controlled” blood glucose. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Doe DV, Wang X, Vedula SS, et al. Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD006127.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Armstrong C. JNC8 guidelines for the management of hypertension in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(7):503–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chew EY, Klein ML, Ferris FL 3rd, et al. Association of elevated serum lipid levels with retinal hard exudate in diabetic retinopathy. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Report 22. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(9):1079–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    •• Das R, Kerr R, Chakravarthy U, Hogg RE. Dyslipidemia and diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1820–7. This meta-analysis examined prospective randomized control trials to determine if there was an effect of dyslipidemia on diabetic macular edema, as suggested by some earlier cohort and case-control studies. They did not find such a link.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, et al. The association of atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors, and retinopathy in adults with diabetes : the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(7):1225–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG. Statin use before diabetes diagnosis and risk of microvascular disease: a nationwide nested matched study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(11):894–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sen K, Misra A, Kumar A, Pandey RM. Simvastatin retards progression of retinopathy in diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002;56(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Keech AC, Mitchell P, Summanen PA, et al. Effect of fenofibrate on the need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1687–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Talbert RL. Role of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult treatment panel III guidelines in managing dyslipidemia. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003;60(13 Suppl 2):S3–8; quiz S25.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nguyen NT, Magno CP, Lane KT, et al. Association of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome with obesity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):928–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cekic S, Cvetkovic T, Jovanovic I, et al. C-reactive protein and chitinase 3-like protein 1 as biomarkers of spatial redistribution of retinal blood vessels on digital retinal photography in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2014;14(3):177–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Is obesity related to microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes? The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(6):650–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raman R, Rani PK, Gnanamoorthy P, et al. Association of obesity with diabetic retinopathy: Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SN-DREAMS Report no. 8). Acta Diabetol. 2010;47(3):209–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lim LS, Tai ES, Mitchell P, et al. C-reactive protein, body mass index, and diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4458–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Porta M, Sjoelie AK, Chaturvedi N, et al. Risk factors for progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diabetologia. 2001;44(12):2203–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dirani M, Xie J, Fenwick E, et al. Are obesity and anthropometry risk factors for diabetic retinopathy? The diabetes management project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4416–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomas RL, Prior SL, Barry JD, et al. Does bariatric surgery adversely impact on diabetic retinopathy in persons with morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes? A pilot study. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(2):191–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Varadhan L, Humphreys T, Walker AB, et al. Bariatric surgery and diabetic retinopathy: a pilot analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22(3):515–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Muni RH, Kohly RP, Lee EQ, et al. Prospective study of inflammatory biomarkers and risk of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(4):514–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Foster GD, Sanders MH, Millman R, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea among obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1017–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dewan NA, Nieto FJ, Somers VK. Intermittent hypoxemia and OSA: implications for comorbidities. Chest. 2015;147(1):266–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shiba T, Sato Y, Takahashi M. Relationship between diabetic retinopathy and sleep-disordered breathing. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(6):1017–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rudrappa S, Warren G, Idris I. Obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy, independent of conventional risk factors and novel biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(12):1535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shiba T, Takahashi M, Hori Y, et al. Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and iris and/or angle neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(4):604–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mason RH, West SD, Kiire CA, et al. High prevalence of sleep disordered breathing in patients with diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2012;32(9):1791–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    •• Nesmith BL, Ihnen M, Schaal S. Poor responders to bevacizumab pharmacotherapy in age-related macular degeneration and in diabetic macular edema demonstrate increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea. Retina 2014;34(12):2423–30. This study found that those patients who responded poorly to anti-VEGF therapy had a higher risk of obstructive sleep apnea. This suggests that such patients should undergo screening for obstructive sleep apnea.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Loprinzi PD, Brodowicz GR, Sengupta S, et al. Accelerometer-assessed physical activity and diabetic retinopathy in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(8):1017–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Waden J, Forsblom C, Thorn LM, et al. Physical activity and diabetes complications in patients with type 1 diabetes: the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):230–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations