Interventional Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

  • Humberto G. RosasEmail author
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (D Fessell, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound


Rather than try and perform a comprehensive review of ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal intervention, this article is arranged to focus on specific topics by revisiting and discussing the practical ways of improving the commonly performed procedures including the treatment of De Quervain’s tenosynovitis and calcific tendinopathy in addition to addressing recent and newly developed procedures such as platelet-rich protein and ultrasound-guided nerve ablation.


Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Platelet-rich plasma Calcific tendinitis De Quervain’s tenosynovitis Greater trochanteric pain syndrome 


Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 26046 kb)


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Sabeti-Aschraf M, Lemmerhofer B, Lang S, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of the acromioclavicular joint infiltration: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:292–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bum Park Y, Ah Choi W, Kim YK, Chul Lee S, Hae Lee J. Accuracy of blind versus ultrasound-guided suprapatellar bursal injection. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:20–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sibbitt WL Jr, Kettwich LG, Band PA, et al. Does ultrasound guidance improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis and corticosteroid injection of the knee? Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41:66–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sibbitt WL Jr, Peisajovich A, Michael AA, et al. Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections? J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1892–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rutten MJ, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ, de Waal Malefijt MC. Injection of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa: blind or ultrasound-guided? Acta Orthop. 2007;78:254–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rousset P, Vuillemin-Bodaghi V, Laredo JD, Parlier-Cuau C. Anatomic variations in the first extensor compartment of the wrist: accuracy of US. Radiology. 2010;257:427–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson WT, Viegas SF, Coon TM, Stimpson KD, Frogameni AD, Simpson JM. Anatomical variations in the first extensor compartment of the wrist. A clinical and anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:923–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabrizio PA, Clemente FR. A variation in the organization of abductor pollicis longus. Clin Anat. 1996;9:371–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee JC, Healy JC. Normal sonographic anatomy of the wrist and hand. Radiographics. 2005;25:1577–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daenen B, Houben G, Bauduin E, Debry R, Magotteaux P. Sonography in wrist tendon pathology. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:462–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Leao L. Quervain’s disease; a clinical and anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958;40:1063–70.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    •• Mahakkanukrauh P, Mahakkanukrauh C. Incidence of a septum in the first dorsal compartment and its effects on therapy of de Quervain’s disease. Clin Anat. 2000;13:195–8. Key article in understanding the importance of identifying the septum in the first dorsal compartment and the effect on treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gousheh J, Yavari M, Arasteh E. Division of the first dorsal compartment of the hand into two separated canals: rule or exception? Arch Iran Med. 2009;12:52–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minamikawa Y, Peimer CA, Cox WL, Sherwin FS. De Quervain’s syndrome: surgical and anatomical studies of the fibroosseous canal. Orthopedics. 1991;14:545–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mirzanli C, Ozturk K, Esenyel CZ, Ayanoglu S, Imren Y, Aliustaoglu S. Accuracy of intrasheath injection techniques for de Quervain’s disease: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surgery Eur Vol. 2012;37:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey FJ, Harvey PM, Horsley MW. De Quervain’s disease: surgical or nonsurgical treatment. J Hand Surg. 1990;15:83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witt J, Pess G, Gelberman RH. Treatment of de Quervain tenosynovitis. A prospective study of the results of injection of steroids and immobilization in a splint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:219–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson BC, Manthey R, Brouns MC. Treatment of De Quervain’s tenosynovitis with corticosteroids. A prospective study of the response to local injection. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34:793–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sawaizumi T, Nanno M, Ito H. De Quervain’s disease: efficacy of intra-sheath triamcinolone injection. Int Orthop. 2007;31:265–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacMahon PJ, Eustace SJ, Kavanagh EC. Injectable corticosteroid and local anesthetic preparations: a review for radiologists. Radiology. 2009;252:647–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Dwek J, Pfirrmann C, Stanley A, Pathria M, Chung CB. MR imaging of the hip abductors: normal anatomy and commonly encountered pathology at the greater trochanter. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;13:691–704 vii. Key article detailing the normal anatomy and common pathology around the greater trochanter. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Segal NA, Felson DT, Torner JC, et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: epidemiology and associated factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:988–92.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    •• Long SS, Surrey DE, Nazarian LN. Sonography of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and the rarity of primary bursitis. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:1083–6. One of the first articles to discuss the primary pathology associated with greater trochanteric pain and demonstrate the relative lack of greater trochanteric bursitis in this patient population. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Labrosse JM, Cardinal E, Leduc BE, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection for the treatment of gluteus medius tendinopathy. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • McEvoy JR, Lee KS, Blankenbaker DG, del Rio AM, Keene JS. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections for treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: greater trochanter bursa versus subgluteus medius bursa. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W313–7. Article describes improved efficacy of image guided injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome if one targets the site of maximal tenderness and the greater trochanteric bursa overlying the gluteus medius tendon. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Balke M, Bielefeld R, Schmidt C, Dedy N, Liem D. Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: midterm results after arthroscopic treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:657–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gosens T, Hofstee DJ. Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: advances in imaging and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2009;11:129–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1582–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uhthoff HK, Loehr JW. Calcific Tendinopathy of the Rotator Cuff: pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5:183–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sorensen L, Teichert G, Skjodt T, Dichmann OL. Preoperative ultrasonographic-guided marking of calcium deposits in the rotator cuff facilitates localization during arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(Suppl 2):103–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leduc BE, Caya J, Tremblay S, Bureau NJ, Dumont M. Treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder by acetic acid iontophoresis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1523–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Daecke W, Kusnierczak D, Loew M. Long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:476–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang CJ, Yang KD, Wang FS, Chen HH, Wang JW. Shock wave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a prospective clinical study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:425–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rompe JD, Zoellner J, Nafe B. Shock wave therapy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;387:72–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    •• Comfort TH, Arafiles RP. Barbotage of the shoulder with image-intensified fluoroscopic control of needle placement for calcific tendinitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;(135):171–8. Key article describing image guided barbotage of calcific tendinitis. Changed the way we treated patients and demonstrated a much less invasive means of treating this particular entity. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    • del Cura JL, Torre I, Zabala R, Legorburu A. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle lavage in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: short- and long-term results. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W128–34. Article demonstrates good long term outcomes following image guided lavage of calcific tendonitis. Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Serafini G, Sconfienza LM, Lacelli F, Silvestri E, Aliprandi A, Sardanelli F. Rotator cuff calcific tendonitis: short-term and 10-year outcomes after two-needle us-guided percutaneous treatment–nonrandomized controlled trial. Radiology. 2009;252:157–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sconfienza LM, Bandirali M, Serafini G, et al. Rotator cuff calcific tendinitis: does warm saline solution improve the short-term outcome of double-needle US-guided treatment? Radiology. 2012;262:560–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jelsing EJ, Maida E, Smith J. A simple technique to restore needle patency during percutaneous lavage and aspiration of calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy. PM R. 2013;5:242–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Foster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, Gerhardt MB, Rodeo SA. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2259–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alsousou J, Thompson M, Hulley P, Noble A, Willett K. The biology of platelet-rich plasma and its application in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 2009;91:987–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hammond JW, Hinton RY, Curl LA, Muriel JM, Lovering RM. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma to treat muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1135–42.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hildebrand KA, Woo SL, Smith DW, et al. The effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on healing of the rabbit medial collateral ligament. An in vivo study. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:549–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lyras DN, Kazakos K, Verettas D, et al. The effect of platelet-rich plasma gel in the early phase of patellar tendon healing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:1577–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Virchenko O, Aspenberg P. How can one platelet injection after tendon injury lead to a stronger tendon after 4 weeks? Interplay between early regeneration and mechanical stimulation. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:806–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mishra A, Pavelko T. Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1774–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Peerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, Gosens T. Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:255–62. One of the early studies on PRP which was a double blind randomized controlled study. Also one of the first articles to demonstrate a positive effect of PRP. Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gosens T, Peerbooms JC, van Laar W, den Oudsten BL. Ongoing positive effect of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection in lateral epicondylitis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1200–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:144–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McShane JM, Nazarian LN, Harwood MI. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for treatment of common extensor tendinosis in the elbow. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1281–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Housner JA, Jacobson JA, Misko R. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for the treatment of chronic tendinosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1187–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Housner JA, Jacobson JA, Morag Y, Pujalte GG, Northway RM, Boon TA. Should ultrasound-guided needle fenestration be considered as a treatment option for recalcitrant patellar tendinopathy? A retrospective study of 47 cases. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:488–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Ultrasound guided sclerosis of neovessels in painful chronic Achilles tendinosis: pilot study of a new treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:173–5 discussion 6-7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Alfredson H, Ohberg L. Sclerosing injections to areas of neo-vascularisation reduce pain in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chan BP, Fu SC, Qin L, Rolf C, Chan KM. Supplementation-time dependence of growth factors in promoting tendon healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:240–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Liu Y, Kalen A, Risto O, Wahlstrom O. Fibroblast proliferation due to exposure to a platelet concentrate in vitro is pH dependent. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10:336–40 official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Liu SS, Ngeow JE, Yadeau JT. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia: a qualitative systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:47–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Leggett LE, Soril LJ, Lorenzetti DL, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for chronic low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19:e146–53.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kastler A, Aubry S, Barbier-Brion B, Jehl J, Kastler B. Radiofrequency neurolysis in the management of inguinal neuralgia: preliminary study. Radiology. 2012;262:701–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosas HG. Ultrasound Guided Neurolysis Utilizing Microwave Ablation Technology. Las Vegas: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Annual Convention; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations