CT Dynamics: The Shift from Morphology to Function
- 734 Downloads
CT has historically been a static imaging modality, but the human body is in constant motion. The need to visualize the underlying physiology has driven CT to capture functional information as well. CT dynamics can be acquired using several different acquisition techniques on both conventional and high-end scanners. Dynamic joints, dynamic CTA, perfusion, and dynamic lungs are all emerging applications of CT dynamics. The use of dynamic CT can yield key diagnostic information not available from static scans.
KeywordsComputed tomography Dynamic volume CT Dual source CT 320-row CT Dynamic imaging
Since its beginnings as solely a neurological imaging device, the number of applications of CT imaging has expanded tremendously. Currently, CT has applications for every anatomical region and nearly every physiological process. CT technology has seen both gradual improvements and breakthrough advances driven by accuracy and sensitivity as well as in speed and economic efficiency. The use of CT has steadily increased by more than threefold since 1993 to over 70 million scans per year . By and large, however, CT has traditionally been used as a modality that produces static images of morphology with high spatial resolution and good soft tissue contrast.
Static anatomic information has always been used to infer the underlying physiology and function. One good example of this is in coronary angiography where the physiologic significance of a lesion is determined wholly by its degree of stenosis: a morphologic metric. However, landmark clinical trials such as COURAGE  and the FAME I  and FAME II [4••] trials have shown that such metrics are inadequate. COURAGE showed that the outcome of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) driven solely by anatomical measures was no better than for patients who received no surgical intervention but were treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT). Subsequently, the FAME trials showed that using fractional flow reserve (FFR), a functional metric, to drive PCI led to a significant reduction in hospitalization and urgent revascularization compared to the OMT group. In order to realize this kind of higher precision imaging, earlier diagnosis, and direct impacts on patient therapy, there is currently a shift in the nature of CT applications from morphology to function. This shift in CT clinical applications towards the imaging of function has opened up a new paradigm in clinical imaging: CT dynamics.
The human body is an inherently dynamic machine. Whether examining the flow of blood through the vessels and perfusing into tissue, the expansion and contraction of the lungs, the movement of the vocal cords, or the flexion and extension of the wrist, the body is in constant motion. The clinical ability to capture that motion and monitor the anatomic and physiologic changes over time can add significant information to the diagnostic process. Dynamic joint instabilities, myocardial wall motion abnormalities, and blood flow measurements all require the imaging of volumetric anatomy over time.
Modern, commercially-available CT scanners offer several methods for acquiring dynamic CT data: low pitch helical, helical shuttle, and dynamic volume imaging. Each acquisition method provides certain advantages and limitations in the collection of data.
One of the simplest ways to acquire dynamic data with a conventional helical scanner, the low-pitch helical approach can be employed for any anatomy where the motion is periodic and the anatomy returns to the same spatial position each cycle. By moving the table slowly enough to capture the same anatomy throughout its cyclical motion, it is possible to re-sort the projections from multiple different detector rows to reconstruct a given section of anatomy at any arbitrary time point in its cycle. Early work with this approach focused solely on imaging the coronary arteries [8, 9, 10, 11], while more recent studies have used this approach with respiratory gating in the lungs .
The main advantage of low-pitch helical scanning is that it can be used on any multidetector row helical scanner. The technical requirements fall on the reconstruction algorithm, however, and there is a significant tradeoff in radiation dose since the technique relies on selecting the relevant projections from an overabundance of data. Also, when the assumption of periodicity is broken, the reconstructed images can contain blurring and artifacts.
With the helical shuttle technique, the same section of anatomy is scanned periodically with a helical acquisition, typically back and forth through the anatomy . With this type of acquisition, large sections of anatomy can be captured over time. The trade-off, however, is that the volumetric temporal resolution is poor, degrading as the scan distance increases. Therefore, it is not possible to capture the rapid motion of the heart, lungs, or joints with this technique. Recently however, some groups have used this technique to capture multiple phases of vascular contrast flow . It is worth noting that with this technique the absolute phase of motion varies along the length of the acquisition. That is, the difference between the temporal phase at the start of the imaging volume and the end increases with increasing scan distance.
The most direct way to measure dynamic motion, especially of rapidly moving anatomy, is by repeated scanning without table motion. This can be accomplished with any modern CT scanner, although the technique is limited by the craniocaudal or z-axis coverage of the system. For example, most 64-row systems can cover approximately 4 cm of anatomy dynamically. Other systems have greater anatomic coverage with 8 and even 16 cm of anatomy being acquired in a single rotation without table motion [15, 16]. The volume scan mode allows the imaged volumes to be interrogated dynamically with temporal uniformity, i.e., the entire volume is imaged at the same temporal phase . The trade-offs with the wider volume systems are an increase in scatter at the detector and the necessity of image reconstruction to handle the cone beam acquisition geometry.
Clinical Applications of Dynamic CT
With these acquisition modes, CT has now become a robust modality for the visualization of the human body in motion. A number of new clinical applications have arisen with the increasing use of dynamic CT: musculoskeletal kinematics (MSK), dynamic CTA, CT perfusion, and other exams with anatomic motion. With each application, the dynamic nature of CT plays an important role. Some applications, like MSK, require high volumetric temporal sampling, while others, like perfusion, may be adaptable to lower sampling rates.
While the earliest work in CT imaging of joint mechanics was conducted by Stanford et al. and Shapeero et al. [22, 23] on the electron beam scanner, early MDCT feasibility work by Tay et al. [24, 25] employed a cadaveric wrist attached to a periodic motion device and scanned with a low helical pitch and retrospective gating. While this work showed the potential of the imaging of joint motion with CT, later work by members of the same group concluded that the imperfect periodicity inherent in patient imaging produces banding artifacts with the retrospective technique . In this subsequent work, this team examined dynamic imaging of the cadaveric wrist without table motion. They showed that the dynamic imaging did not rely on periodic motion and eliminated the banding artifacts. While the longitudinal coverage for this study was only 38.4 mm, Leng et al. found this to be sufficient for evaluation of scapholunate instability where the main focus is on the proximal carpal bones.
Kalia et al. [27•] first reported on the technical feasibility of dynamic joint imaging with a wide detector CT scanner. Using a 256 detector-row prototype system with 12.8 cm of longitudinal coverage, they dynamically evaluated both the knee and the wrist in vivo. Three volunteers underwent bilateral knee imaging for patellofemoral evaluation and three others underwent bilateral wrist imaging for both supination-pronation and radioulnar deviation. The investigators found that the image quality was rated as “good” in all cases with some artifacts noted. Furthermore, the ability to depict normal joint motion was rated with the highest rating of “well depicted” for all joints examined. They concluded that the wide-detector dynamic evaluation of dynamic joints was feasible and showed good potential for evaluation of pathomechanics including patellofemoral maltracking, carpal instability, and chronic distal radioulnar joint instability. This work was followed up using a 320 detector-row system with 16 cm of longitudinal coverage by Halpenny et al.  looking specifically at scapholunate instability in a patient. They demonstrated the ability to measure the increase in the scapholunate distance during the motion that caused the patient the most pain.
Recently, Wassilew et al.  looked at the dynamic assessment of femoroacetabular impingement and subluxation in 30 patients using the 320 detector-row scanner. They compared the results with interoperative findings and found that the dynamic CT had a high degree of accuracy and was a new option for visualizing morphology and impingement prior to surgery. The main limitation of this approach was noted to be its increased radiation dose over static, diagnostic CT of the same region.
Bent et al. [32•] were the first to report on volumetric dynamic CTA evaluating its utility in the characterization of endoleaks following fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (f-EVAR). The report argues that while DSA is the gold standard in these cases, it is a challenging procedure due to the high number of arterial puncture sites and contrast injections, as well as carrying a high radiation dose. The group used a 320-detector row system, scanning dynamically and continuously for 18 s with a 0.5 s rotation time. They were able to clearly demonstrate a type III endoleak in their patient and argued that such a demonstration would not be possible with a static CTA exam.
Brouwer et al.  described dynamic CTA evaluation of shunting lesions such as AVMs and DAVFs using the 320-detector row scanner. They generated 22 time points from the CT data for each case, and used the initial time point as the subtraction mask. The resulting data were compared to standard catheter angiography (CA) in the same patients. They showed comparable diagnostic ability between CA and dynamic CTA for these cases demonstrating early venous filling, cortical venous reflux, and a benign DAVF. Simultaneous visualization of all cranial vascular territories was noted using CT compared to the selective vessel injections possible with CA. An advantage of CT is that it allows the visualization of the anatomy and function from any angle in post-processing where CA views must be determined during the procedure. The maximum radiation dose for CT was reported to be 5.1 mSv. In a follow-up study, Willems et al.  demonstrated high correlation between dynamic CTA and CA in the detection of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in a small cohort of 17 patients. They found the main limitations of 4D-CTA were in the accurate estimation and identification of some of the angioarchitectural details such as underestimation of the nidus size and misinterpretation of indirect feeding through pial collaterals. Ultimately, they found 4D-CTA to be sufficient to accurately diagnose and classify the shunt. In a separate study, Willems et al.  also describe the ability of 4D-CTA to identify and classify DAVFs in a cohort of 11 patients. They found the technique to be robust unless the patient had a small, slow-flow DAVF in which case the pathology might be missed. Finally, Krings et al.  reported on the flow dynamics of an intracavernous aneurysm and evaluate the aneurysm’s pulsatility using dynamic CT. They postulated that the focal pulsations were associated with the subsequent growth of the aneurysm in the region that showed pulsatility.
Recently, Meinel et al.  reported on time-resolved angiography using a dual-source scanner in a multi-phase helical shuttle exam using a technique previously described by Sommer [38•]. In this study, they scanned 14 patients with known or suspected aortic dissection using six reconstructed time phases covering 48 cm. The time between each phase was 6 s. They demonstrated the difference in enhancement time between the true and false lumen and the oscillation of the dissection membrane, difficult to visualize without dynamics. The average radiation dose was 27.7 mSv. Sommer et al.  used a similar scanning technique to detect and classify endoleaks compared to contrast enhanced ultrasound. In a cohort of 54 patients, they acquired 12 helical phases of 27 cm with 2.5 s between each phase. They showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting and classifying primarily type I and type II endoleaks with an average radiation dose of 14.6 mSv. In a similar study, Lehmkuhl et al. examined the rate of type I and type II endoleak detection with no reference standard using, rather, a metric of diagnostic confidence. They found that endoleaks were more likely to be found in the dynamic scan which contained phases that were not typically acquired in a standard biphasic CTA exam.
Barfett et al.  used dynamic volume CT in a phantom to show the feasibility of measuring blood flow directly. Using a method from conventional angiography , the group compared the bolus profiles at two locations within a cadaveric vessel. They noted that the dynamic CT technique holds advantages over both Doppler ultrasound and phase contrast MRI in that it is rapid, user independent, and can potentially measure the flow in small vessels that are inaccessible to ultrasound. However, this technique is limited by the need for a reasonable distance between the bolus measurements to correspond to the precision of the temporal measurements, as well as by the sensitivity to different phases of the cardiac cycle.
Dynamic Airways and Lungs
While static CT has a large number of applications in the lungs and airways, the dynamic motion of this anatomy has historically been inferred from one or more scans . While earlier studies by Lee et al.  looked at tracheomalacia during forced expiration with a static helical scan , Wagnetz et al.  did a similar study with dynamically acquired volume CT in six patients with a suspicion of tracheomalacia. They imaged for either 4.5 or 6.5 s from the end of inspiration through the forceful expiration phase. By scanning dynamically, they found that the peak airway collapse did not occur synchronously; rather, the distal trachea had peak collapse at 2–3 s into expiration where the proximal trachea showed peak collapse at 3–4 s. They reported a maximum radiation dose of 8.2 mSv for this study. In another airway study, Low et al.  examined abnormal laryngeal function in patients with difficult to treat asthma. They imaged the larynx dynamically during normal breathing over the course of 1 respiratory cycle. They found abnormal narrowing in the vocal cords in 50 % of the asthmatic patients compared to a cohort of healthy volunteers. The maximum dose for the dynamic study was reported to be 2 mSv.
Nearly any anatomy in motion can be imaged with dynamic CT. There is increased diagnostic information available over and above static imaging by repeatedly interrogating the anatomy during motion. Through the use of dynamic axial, low-pitch helical, shuttle mode, or wide volume scanning, anatomic dynamics can be captured and visualized with most modern CT systems. There are, however, a few caveats and limitations to the employment of these dynamic acquisitions.
One challenge is the radiation dose associated with repeated scanning of the same anatomy. Since dose is cumulative, every imaging phase multiplies the amount of energy absorbed by the patient. This is typically mitigated by using scan techniques that result in static images that are noisy and of lower quality than the standard diagnostic technique. With contrast enhanced studies, the use of a lower tube potential, typically 80 or 100 kV, can also lower the dose . Furthermore, with the increase in iterative reconstruction and time-domain filtering techniques , the image quality of the reduced dose dynamic acquisitions can be greatly improved. Finally, as with all imaging, there are specific indications that benefit from a dynamic scan and others that do not, so care should be taken to use dynamic CT where it is most warranted.
There are even a few challenges inherent in the physiology and kinesiology of the body. For example, the field of dynamic MSK diagnostics is an emerging clinical field and the understanding about what “normal” motion is and what its boundaries are may not be completely known. Furthermore, many MSK pathologies are exacerbated by or only manifest under weight-bearing conditions. Simulating this can be difficult in most CT scanners, although one dedicated design has been proposed . Similarly, for myocardial perfusion imaging, pharmacological stress agents must be employed to image the heart during hyperemia. Creating or simulating these situations can add to the challenge of dynamic imaging with CT.
Another challenge with dynamic CT is the sheer volume of image data that is generated by these techniques. A 20 phase perfusion scan with 320 images per volume is over 6000 images. Therefore, the PACS systems, analysis packages, and infrastructure need to be prepared to handle larger volumes of data when dynamic scanning is involved. Furthermore, the software used to create these 4D images must reflect this new way of looking at form and function, and produce intuitive ways of managing and presenting this data to the reading clinician.
Ultimately, when used for the proper clinical indications, dynamic CT can be a useful and robust part of a diagnostic algorithm. Minimizing acquisition technique, reducing kV where appropriate, and employing iterative reconstruction and time-domain filtering provides a strong foundation for routine dynamic imaging. Furthermore, dynamic imaging plays a direct role in the effort to build patient-specific models of normal organ and body function . CT will continue its expansion into the imaging of physiology and kinesiology. In this role, CT dynamics will be a cornerstone of functional imaging applications and will provide new insights into clinical diagnoses and improve patient care.
R Mather is an employee of Toshiba Medical Research Institute USA, Inc.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance; •• Of major importance
- 4.•• De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.Google Scholar
Landmark trial showing that functional information (pressure drop across a lesion by FFR) can provide a better metric to drive therapy (PCI) than anatomic information (stenosis by conventional cath)
- 27.• Kalia V, Obray RW, Filice R, et al. Functional joint imaging using 256-MDCT: technical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:W295–9. The first report on area detector CT imaging of joints in motion.Google Scholar
The first report on area detector CT imaging of joints in motion
- 32.• Bent CL, Jaskolka JD, Lindsay TF, Tan K. The use of dynamic volumetric CT angiography (DV-CTA) for the characterization of endoleaks following fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (f-EVAR). J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:203–6. Google Scholar
One of the first reports on the use of dynamic volume CT angiography. Shows that dynamic assessment of endoleaks can improve characterization.
- 38.• Sommer WH, Clevert DA, Bamberg F, et al. Time-resolved computed tomography imaging of the aorta: a feasibility study. J Thorac Imaging. 2010;25:161–7.Google Scholar
Demonstrated feasibility of helical shuttle to produce time-resolved CTA over a wide area.
- 47.Schramm P, Schellinger PD, Klotz E, et al. Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours’ duration. Stroke. 2004;35:1652–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Dabaneh H, Guerrero W, Wilson K, et al. Observation of Mean Transit Time (Mtt) perfusion maps on a 320-Detector Row CT Scanner and its potential application in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2011;2:115.Google Scholar
- 60.Katada Y, Shukuya T, Kawashima M, et al.: A comparative study between arterial spin labeling and CT perfusion methods on hepatic portal venous flow. Jpn J Radiol. 2012 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 68.• Ohno Y, Koyama H, Matsumoto K, et al. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with quantitative first-pass 320-detector row perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 2011;258:599–609.Google Scholar
The first study of dynamic volume perfusion in the lung. Showed ability of perfusion to identify malignant nodules.
- 82.George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the ct angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:829–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar