A Rotational Hardening Model Capturing Undrained Failure in Anisotropic Soft Clays

  • Yanni Chen
  • Ferdinando Marinelli
  • Giuseppe BuscarneraEmail author
Original Paper


Induced anisotropy is known to play a major role in the undrained strength of clays, especially in case of weakly consolidated deposits. This paper discusses undrained failure in soft clays in light of material stability principles. For this purpose, a strain-hardening elastoplastic model widely used to study undrained instability in isotropic soils is enhanced to account for stress-induced anisotropy. A versatile yield function able to flexibly control the shape of the elastic domain is augmented through a hardening variable related to the evolving fabric, while rotational hardening is used to replicate the reorientation of the surface as a function of the loading history. Parametric analyses are used to illustrate the model capabilities, and instability indices for undrained failure are derived in analytical form. Finally, the model performance is tested against experimental evidence available for two widely tested soils: soft Chicago clay and Boston blue clay. The analyses illustrate how the proposed model allows an accurate representation of soil responses under extension and compression paths. In addition, it enables the identification of undrained failure resulting from the monotonic growth of shear stresses, as well as from a post-peak strength decay.


Induced anisotropy Constitutive modeling Non-associativity Rotational hardening Undrained failure 



This work was supported by Grant No. CMMI-1351534 awarded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGrow-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood MD (1990) Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oda M (1972) Initial fabrics and their relations to mechanical properties of granular material. Soils Found 12(1):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshimine M, Ishihara K, Vargas W (1998) Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand. Soils Found 38(3):179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oda M, Nemat-Nasser S, Konishi J (1985) Stress-induced anisotropy in granular masses. Soils Found 25(3):85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohta H, Hata S (1971) In: Proceedings of the Japan society of civil engineers, vol 1971. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, pp 117–124Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dafalias YF (1986) An anisotropic critical state soil plasticity model. Mech Res Commun 13(6):341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pestana JM, Whittle AJ, Gens A (2002) Evaluation of a constitutive model for clays and sands: part II-clay behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26(11):1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wheeler SJ, Näätänen A, Karstunen M, Lojander M (2003) An anisotropic elastoplastic model for soft clays. Can Geotech J 40(2):403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li XS, Dafalias YF (2002) Constitutive modeling of inherently anisotropic sand behavior. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(10):868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu H (1998) CASM: a unified state parameter model for clay and sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 22(8):621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen Y, Yang Z (2017) A family of improved yield surfaces and their application in modeling of isotropically over-consolidated clays. Comput Geotech 90:133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dafalias YF, Manzari MT, Papadimitriou AG (2006) Saniclay: simple anisotropic clay plasticity model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30(12):1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dafalias Y, Taiebat M (2013) Anatomy of rotational hardening in clay plasticity. Géotechnique 63(16):1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dafalias Y, Taiebat M (2014) Rotational hardening with and without anisotropic fabric at critical state. Géotechnique 64(6):507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nova R (1994) Controllability of the incremental response of soil specimen subjected to arbitrary loading programmes. J Mech Behav Mater 5:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buscarnera G, Whittle A (2013) Model prediction of static liquefaction: the influence of initial state on potential instabilities. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(3):420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lagioia R, Puzrin A, Potts D (1996) A new versatile expression for yield and plastic potential surfaces. Comput Geotech 19(3):171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nova R, Castellanza R, Tamagnini C (2003) A constitutive model for bonded geomaterials subject to mechanical and/or chemical degradation. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 27(9):705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mihalache C, Buscarnera G (2014) Mathematical identification of diffuse and localized instabilities in fluid-saturated sands. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38(2):111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mihalache C, Buscarnera G (2014) Is wetting collapse an unstable compaction process? J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buscarnera G, Dattola G, di Prisco C (2011) Controllability, uniqueness and existence of the incremental response: a mathematical criterion for elastoplastic constitutive laws. Int J Solids Struct 48(13):1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roscoe KH, Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1958) On the yielding of soils. Géotechnique 8(1):22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roscoe K, Burland J (1968) On the generalized stress–strain behaviour of 'wet' clay. Engineering plasticity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 535–609zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graham J, Noonan M, Lew K (1983) Yield states and stress–strain relationships in a natural plastic clay. Can Geotech J 20(3):502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ling HI, Yue D, Kaliakin VN, Themelis NJ (2002) Anisotropic elastoplastic bounding surface model for cohesive soils. J Eng Mech 128(7):748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yin ZY, Xu Q, Hicher PY (2013) A simple critical-state-based double-yield-surface model for clay behavior under complex loading. Acta Geotech 8(5):509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Borja RI, Tamagnini C, Amorosi A (1997) Coupling plasticity and energy-conserving elasticity models for clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(10):948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Imposimato S, Nova R (1998) An investigation on the uniqueness of the incremental response of elastoplastic models for virgin sand. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 3:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chung C, Finno R (1992) Influence of depositional processes on the geotechnical parameters of chicago glacial clays. Eng Geol 32(4):225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarabia F (2012) Hypoplastic constitutive law adapted to simulate excavations in Chicago glacial clays. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ladd CC, Varallyay J (1965) The influence of stress system on the behavior of saturated clays during undrained shear. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Soil Mechanics DivisionGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Papadimitriou AG, Manzari MT, Dafalias YF (2005) Calibration of a simple anisotropic plasticity model for soft clays. In: Soil constitutive models: evaluation, selection, and calibration, pp 415–424Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations