Advertisement

Indian Geotechnical Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 529–540 | Cite as

A Mechanistic Pullout Model for GRS Walls Under Kinematic Consideration

  • Shantanu Patra
  • Jagadish T. Shahu
Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a modified mechanistic model to study the pullout responses of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. The analysis considers the kinematics of the failure, the stiffness and the deformation compatibility of the reinforcement. An updated discretization technique is proposed to account for the deformation compatibility of the reinforcement. A simple iteration scheme is suggested to compute the active length of the reinforcement, which is essential for the before pullout response of an extensible reinforcement. The analysis is performed using a linear-elastic subgrade based on Pasternak model and the resulting second order differential equations in nondimensionalized form are solved applying the finite difference method with the proper boundary conditions. A case study is conducted for a series of full-scale instrumented reinforced soil walls to validate the present analysis. The reinforcement load at each level was back-predicted using the present analysis, and the results are compared with the measured data, AASHTO simplified method and K-stiffness method. The back-analysis demonstrates that the present analysis can be readily integrated with the existing method of analysis (AASHTO) and gives a better prediction of the reinforcement load. A parametric study is also conducted to quantify, predominantly the effect of reinforcement stiffness on the pullout response. The pullout is found to be the prevalent mode of failure for higher reinforcement stiffness; however, for a lower stiffness, the strain may exceed the allowable limit causing a tension failure before the pullout.

Keywords

Geosynthetics reinforced soil (GRS) walls Pullout Case study Pasternak model 

References

  1. 1.
    Sobhi S, Wu JTH (1996) An interface pullout formula for extensible sheet reinforcement. Geosynth Int 3(5):565–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar PP, Madhav MR, Kumar M (2015) Continuum modeling and analysis of polymeric sheet reinforcement subjected to axial pull. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(1):1–10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madhav M, Umashankar B (2003) Analysis of inextensible sheet reinforcement subject to downward displacement/force: non-linear subgrade response. Geosynth Int 10(3):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shahu JT (2007) Pullout response of inextensible sheet reinforcement subject to oblique end-force. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(11):1440–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shahu JT (2008) Inextensible reinforcement on non-linear elasto-plastic subgrade under oblique pull. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:2067–2081CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patra S, Shahu JT (2012) Pasternak model for oblique pullout of inextensible reinforcement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(12):1503–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shahu JT, Hayashi S (2009) Analysis of extensible reinforcement subject to oblique pull. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(5):623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madhav MR, Manoj TP (2004) Reinforcement–soil interactions under transverse and oblique forces. In: CF Leung et al (eds) Proc 12th Asian regional conf on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 1139–1155Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koerner RM (2005) Designing with geosynthetics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowe RK, Ho SK (1993) Keynote lecture: a review of the behaviour of reinforced soil walls. In: Ochiai H, Hayashi S, Otani J (eds) Proc. int. symp. on earth reinforcement practice, vol 2. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 801–830Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gourc JP, Ratel A, Delmas P (1986) Design of fabric retaining walls: the displacement method. In: Proc. 3rd int. conf. on geotextiles geomembranes and other products, vol 2, Vienna, pp 289–294Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bergado DT, Teerawattanasuk C, Long PV (2000) Localized mobilization of reinforcement force and its direction in the vicinity of failure surface. Geotext Geomembr 18:311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaniraj SR (1996) Directional dependency of reinforcement force in reinforced embankments on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 14(9):507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shewbridge SE, Sitar N (1989) Deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear. J Geotech Eng 115(8):1134–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jewell RA (1992) Keynote lecture: links between the testing, modeling and design of reinforced soil. In: Proc. int. symp. on earth reinforcement, vol 2. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 755–772Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div 101(12):1257–1276Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leshchinsky D, Boedeker RH (1989) Geosynthetics reinforced soil structures. J Geotech Eng 115(10):1459–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patra S, Shahu JT (2015) Behaviour of extensible reinforcement resting on non-linear Pasternak subgrade subjected to oblique pull. Géotechnique 65(9):770–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao Y, Yang S, Wu Y, Li D, Zhang F (2014) Evaluation of oblique pullout resistance of reinforcements in soil wall subjected to seismic loads. Geotext Geomembr 42(5):515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee KL, Adams BD, Vagneron JMJ (1973) Reinforced earth retaining walls. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(10):745–764Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Juran I, Christopher B (1989) Laboratory model study on geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls. J Geotech Eng 115(7):905–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Selvadurai APS (1979) Elastic analysis of soil–foundation interaction. Developments in geotechnical engineering, vol 17. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang HB, Anderson MP (1982) Introduction to ground water modeling: finite difference and finite element methods. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bathurst R, Nernheim A, Walters D, Allen T, Burgess P, Saunders D (2009) Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 16(1):43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    NCMA (1997) Design manual for segmental retaining walls. In: Collin J (ed), 2nd edn. National Concrete Masonry Association, HerndonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bathurst RJ, Allen TM, Walters DL (2005) Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method. Geotext Geomembr 23(4):287–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bathurst R, Miyata Y, Nernheim A, Allen A (2008) Refinement of K-stiffness method for geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 15(4):269–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang B, Bathurst RJ, Hatami K (2009) Numerical study of reinforced soil segmental walls using three different constitutive soil models. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(10):1486–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg RR (2001) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes—design and construction guidelines. Report FHWA-NHI-00-043, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Long PV, Bergado DT, Balasuramanyam AS (1997) Localized mobilization of geotextile reinforcement force at failure surface. In: Proc. 14th int. conf. on soil. mech. and found. eng, Hamburg, pp 1761–1764Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leshchinsky D (2001) Design dilemma: use peak or residual strength of soil. Geotext Geomembr 19(2):111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InfrastructureIndian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarKhurdaIndia
  2. 2.Civil Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology DelhiHauz Khas, New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations