Indian Geotechnical Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 252–260 | Cite as

Soil Suction Measurement of Unsaturated Soils with a Sensor Using Fixed-Matrix Porous Ceramic Discs

  • Snehasis TripathyEmail author
  • Sahar Al-Khyat
  • Peter John Cleall
  • Wiebke Baille
  • Tom Schanz
Original Paper


This paper presents suction measurements in case of unsaturated soils using a commercially available water potential sensor. The sensor uses ceramic discs of predetermined pore-size distribution (i.e., fixed-matrix) for suction measurement and a surface mounted thermistor to take temperature readings. The ceramic disc assembly of the sensor is brought in contact with a soil for which the suction measurement is required. The sensor measures the water content of the ceramic discs and further uses the water retention characteristic of the ceramic discs to determine suction. The suction thus determined is equal to the suction of the soil which is in contact with the sensor. Soil–water mixtures were prepared from two clays (Speswhite kaolin and MX80 bentonite) with a diversified range of plasticity properties and mineralogy. Suction measurements of the soil–water mixtures were carried out at several water contents. The measured suctions of the clays were compared with the test results from a dew-point potentiameter. The test results showed that, very high suctions up to more than 10,000 kPa and very low suctions up to about 10 kPa can be measured using the sensor. The suction equilibrium time for the soils studied was found to vary between a couple of hours to several days depending upon the magnitude of suction and initial state of the sensor (i.e., wet or dry). Comparisons of the test results from the sensor with the results from the dew-point potentiameter tests showed some significant differences in case of the bentonite, whereas the agreements between the test results from the two devices were better in case of Speswhite kaolin. The test results clearly showed that under predetermined conditions, the water potential sensor can be used to measure soil suction greater than 1500 kPa within a few hours.


Laboratory tests Monitoring Partial saturation Suction Time dependence 



The Visiting International Professor grant received from Research School PLUS, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany is gratefully acknowledged. The first author acknowledges the financial support provided by the Welsh Government and Higher Education Funding Council for Wales through the Sêr Cymru National Research Network for Low Carbon, Energy and Environment. The writers are grateful to Mr. Ian Coates, Labcell Ltd., UK and Dr. Doug R. Cobos, Decagon Devices, Inc., US, for the helpful discussions related to the water potential sensor used in this study. The authors are grateful to Mr. Xinwei Guo, B. Eng. student at Cardiff University and Mr. Jeison Fabiano Vieira, Students Without Boarder (SWB) student from Brazil for carrying out some initial tests using the water potential sensors.


  1. 1.
    Aitchison GD (ed) (1965) Moisture equilibria and moisture changes in soils beneath covered areas. In: A symposium in print. Butterworths, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bulut R, Leong EC (2008) Indirect measurement of suction. Geotech Geol Eng 26(6):633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Decagon Devices (2014) Commercial publications, operator’s manual for MPS-2 & MPS-6 dielectric water potential sensors. Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman
  4. 4.
    Delage P, Romero E, Tarantino A (2008) Recent developments in the techniques of controlling and measuring suction in unsaturated soils. In: Unsaturated soils: advances in geo-engineering, Toll DG et al. (eds), Routledge, London, pp. 33–52. Proceedings of the first European conference on unsaturated soils, E-UNSAT, Durham, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleureau J-M, Kheirbek-Saoud S, Soemitro R, Taibi S (1993) Behavior of clayey soils on drying-wetting paths. Can Geotech J 30(2):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krahn J, Fredlund DG (1972) On total, matric and osmotic suction. J Soil Sci 114(5):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leong EC, Tripathy S, Rahardjo H (2003) Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using the chilled-mirror dew-point technique. Géotechnique 53(2):173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang AM, Cui YJ (2005) Controlling suction by vapor equilibrium technique at different temperatures, Application in determining the water retention properties of MX80 clay. Can Geotech J 42(1):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tripathy S, Elgabu H, Thomas HR (2012) Matric suction measurement of unsaturated soils with null-type axis-translation technique. Geotech Test J 35(1):91–102Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tripathy S, Rees SW (2013) Suction of some polyethylene glycols commonly used for unsaturated soil testing. Geotech Test J 36(5):768–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tripathy S, Tadza MYM, Thomas HR (2014) Soil–water characteristic curves of clays. Can Geotech J 51(8):869–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vanapalli SK, Sillers WS, Fredlund MD (1998) The meaning and relevance of residual state to unsaturated soils. In: Proceedings of the 51st Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Edmonton, Alta., Canada, October 4–7, pp. 1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Geotechnical Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Foundation Engineering, Soil and Rock MechanicsRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations