Advertisement

A Novel Material for the Removal of Zinc from Wastewater Using Sterculia Foetida

  • Vijetha PonnamEmail author
  • Subbaiah Tondepu
  • Ramesh Naidu Mandapati
  • Murali Naik
  • Ranganadha Reddy Aluri
  • Naresh Katari
Original Contribution
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, optimization using central composite design (CCD) was studied to determine the ideal conditions for the adsorption of zinc using Sterculia foetida. The effect of four process parameters, such as time (30–240 min), initial concentration (10–100 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (0.1–1 g), and pH (3–10), was studied to obtain the best results for zinc adsorption on to Sterculia foetida using CCD. With these ranges, CCD has given 30 possible experimental runs. From the desirability values, the optimum values of initial concentration (20 mg/L), adsorbent dosage (0.1 g), and pH (10) were obtained with  % removal value of 89.5. From the results obtained, it was clear that pH and initial concentration play a major role in the adsorption of zinc on to Sterculia foetida with p value equal to 0.0413 and 0.0005, respectively. The model F value obtained was 2.84, which implies that the quadratic model is significant.

Keywords

Optimization Biosorbent Central composite design Sterculia foetida Response surface methodology 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    U. Forstnet, G.T.W. Wittmann, Metal pollution in the aquatic environment (Springer, Berlin, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I.N. Lester, Heavy metals in wastewater and sludge treatment processes (CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, 1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Kaya, A.H. Oren, Adsorption of zinc from aqueous solutions to bentonite. J Hazar Mater 125(1–3), 183–189 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Karapinar, R. Donat, Adsorption behavior of Cu2+ and Cd2+ on to natural bentonite. Desalination 249(1), 123–129 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.P. Huang, A.L. Morehart, The removal of Cu(II) from dilute aqueous solutions by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Water Res 24(4), 433–439 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Amarasinghe, R.A. William, Chem Eng J 132, 299–309 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.S. MacDonald, J Nutr 130, 500–1508 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.H. Kalavathy, L.R. Miranda, Chem Eng J 158, 188–199 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.S. Rao, S. Anand, K. Venkateswarlu, Bioresourse 5, 438–454 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.K. Garg, H.K. Garg, Int J Theor Appl Sci 8(1), 7–24 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z.N. Garba, A.R. Afidah, Process optimization of K2Cr2O4-activated carbon from Prosopis Africana seed hulls using response surface methodology. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 107, 306–312 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.A. Ahmad, R. Alrozi, Optimization of preparation conditions for mangostem peel-based activated carbons for the removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R using response surface methodology. Chem Eng J 165, 883–890 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.V.K. Babu, K. Swarnasri, P. Vijetha, A three phase unbalanced power flow method for secondary distribution system. Adv Model Anal B 61(3), 139–144 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vijetha Ponnam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subbaiah Tondepu
    • 1
  • Ramesh Naidu Mandapati
    • 1
  • Murali Naik
    • 1
  • Ranganadha Reddy Aluri
    • 2
  • Naresh Katari
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringVFSTR (Deemed to be) UniversityVadlamudiIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyVFSTR (Deemed to be) UniversityVadlamudiIndia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryGEETHAM (Deemed to be university)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations