Mineralogical and Beneficiation Studies of a Low Grade Iron Ore Sample
- 247 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Investigations were carried out, to establish its amenability for physical beneficiation on a low grade siliceous iron ore sample by magnetic separation. Mineralogical studies, with the help of microscope as well as XRD, SEM–EDS revealed that the sample consists of magnetite, hematite and goethite as major opaque oxide minerals where as quartz and kaolinite form the gangue minerals in the sample. Processes involving combination of classification, dry magnetic separation and wet magnetic separation were carried out to upgrade the low grade siliceous iron ore sample to make it suitable as a marketable product. The sample was first ground and each closed size sieve fractions were subjected to dry magnetic separation and it was observed that limited upgradation is possible. The ground sample was subjected to different finer sizes and separated by wet low intensity magnetic separator. Dry beneficiation studies by Permaroll separator indicated that it is possible to get a product with 60.2 % Fe at 22 % weight recovery. It is possible to get an over all concentrate with 54 % Fe at 32.4 % weight recovery by combination of size reduction followed by LIMS and WHIMS.
Keywords
Iron ore Mineralogy Beneficiation Magnetite Characterization Dry and wet magnetic separationNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to The Director, CSIR-IMMT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha for his kind permission to publish this paper.
References
- 1.B.C. Acharya, D.S. Rao, R.K. Sahoo, B. Dash, Phosphorus in the siliceous manganese ores of Nishikhal, Orissa. Indian J. Geol. 66(1), 15–23 (1994)Google Scholar
- 2.A.I. Arol, A. Aydogan, Recovery enhancement of magnetite fines in magnetic separation. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem Eng Asp. 232(2–3), 151–154 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J.A. Bartnik, W.H. Zabel, D.M. Hopstock, On the production of iron ore superconcentrates by high-intensity wet magnetic separation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2(2), 117–126 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.B. Das, B.K. Mishra, S. Prakash, S.K. Das, P.S.R. Reddy, S.I. Angadi, Magnetic and flotation studies of banded hematite quartzite (BHQ) ore for the production of pellet grade concentrate. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 17(6), 675–682 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.S. Dey, R.P. Bhagat, R.K. Kunwar, D.S. Rao, B. Banerjee, S.C. Maulik, Comparative studies on beneficiation of bauxite samples for application in refractory industry. Metals Mater. Process. 13(1), 1–8 (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.R.K. Dwari, D.S. Rao, P.S.R. Reddy, Magnetic separation studies for a low grade siliceous iron ore sample. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 23, 1–5 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.B. Kar, H. Sahoo, S.S. Rath, D.S. Rao, B. Das, Characterization and beneficiation studies for the removal of iron from a china clay from India. Clay Miner. 48, 759–769 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.A.N. Koshkalda, N.V. Sukinova, V.V. Ivashchenko, EYu. Kovalenkova, Intensifying the dry magnetic beneficiation of iron ores. Metallurgist 51(7–8), 417–419 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.B.K. Mohapatra, D.S. Rao, R.K. Sahoo, Characterisation and magnetic separation studies of Chikla manganese ores, Maharastra. Indian Min. Eng. J. 34(7), 37–42 (1995)Google Scholar
- 10.L. Panda, D.S. Rao, B.K. Mishra, B. Das, Characterization and dissolution study of low-grade ferruginous nickel lateritic ore by sulphuric acid. Miner. Metall. Process. 31(1), 57–65 (2014)Google Scholar
- 11.S. Prakash, B. Das, B.K. Mohapatra, R. Venugopal, Recovery of iron values from iron ore slimes by selective magnetic coating. Sep. Sci. Technol. 35(16), 2651–2652 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.D.S. Rao, S.I. Angadi, S.D. Muduli, B.D. Nayak, Recovery of chromite values from the ferro-chrome industry flue dust. A.T. Miner. Process. 51(12), 56–63 (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.C. Satpathy, S. Routary, D.S. Rao, Heavy minerals recovery from beach and dune sand deposits of Ganjam coast. World Metall-Erzmetall 63(1), 25–33 (2010)Google Scholar