Advertisement

State Estimation for Landing Maneuver on High Performance Aircraft

  • P. S. SureshEmail author
  • Niranjan K. Sura
  • K. Shankar
Original Contribution
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

State estimation methods are popular means for validating aerodynamic database on aircraft flight maneuver performance characteristics. In this work, the state estimation method during landing maneuver is explored for the first of its kind, using upper diagonal adaptive extended Kalman filter (UD-AEKF) with fuzzy based adaptive tunning of process noise matrix. The mathematical model for symmetrical landing maneuver consists of non-linear flight mechanics equation representing Aircraft longitudinal dynamics. The UD-AEKF algorithm is implemented in MATLAB environment and the states with bias is considered to be the initial conditions just prior to the flare. The measurement data is obtained from a non-linear 6 DOF pilot in loop simulation using FORTRAN. These simulated measurement data is additively mixed with process and measurement noises, which are used as an input for UD-AEKF. Then, the governing states that dictate the landing loads at the instant of touch down are compared. The method is verified using flight data wherein, the vertical acceleration at the aircraft center of gravity (CG) is compared. Two possible outcome of purely relying on the aircraft measured data is highlighted. It is observed that, with the implementation of adaptive fuzzy logic based extended Kalman filter tuned to adapt for aircraft landing dynamics, the methodology improves the data quality of the states that are sourced from noisy measurements.

Keywords

State estimation Extended Kalman filter Adaptive fuzzy logic method High performance aircraft Flared landings 

References

  1. 1.
    M. Lacagnina, Flight saftey digest: avoiding hard landings. Technical Publication 23(8), Flight Saftey Foundation, Alexandria (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Military Specification (MIL)-A-8861B, Airplane Strength and rigidity for flight loads, revision B (DOD, 07 February 1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Military Specification (MIL)-A-8863C, Airplane Strength and rigidity ground loads for Navy acquired Airplanes, revision C (DOD,19 July 1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Sartor, R. K. Schmidt, W. Becker, K. Worden, D. A. Bond, W. J. Staszewski, Conceptual Design of a hard landing indication system using a flight parameter sensor simulation model, 27th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 19–24 September 2010, Nice, France.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.D. Martin, J.P. Acks, System for indicating an airplane hard landing", US 20110214601 A1, issued 08 September 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Molent, B. Aktepe, Review of fatigue monitoring of agile military aircraft. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 23, 767–785 (2000). 1H1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.A. Mulder, Q.P. Chu, J.K. Sridhar, J.H. Breeman, M. Laban, Non-linear aircraft flight path reconstruction review and new advances. Progress Aerosp. Sci. 35, 673–726 (1999). 1A1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.C.O. Maciel, L.C.S. Goes, E.M. Hemerly, N.S.B. Neto, Flight path reconstruction and parameter estimation using output–error method. Shock Vib. 13, 379–392 (2006). 1A1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.W. Sorenson, Parameter Estimation–Principles and Problems (Marcel Dekker, Newyork and Basel, 1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Chowdhary, R. Jategaonkar, Aerodynamic parameter estimation from flight data applying extended and unscented Kalman filter. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 14, 106–117 (2010). 1A1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.V. Jategaonkar, F. Thielecke, Aircraft parameter estimation–a tool for development of aerodynamic databases. Sadhana 25(2), 119–135 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G.J. Bierman, Factorisation Method for Discrete Sequential Estimation (Academic Press, New York, 1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Jetto, S. Longhi, D. Vitali, Localization of a wheeled mobile robot by sensor data fusion based on fiuzzy logic adapted Kalman filter. Control Eng. Practice 4, 763–771 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Chen, C.K. Chui, A modified adaptive Kalman filter for real-time applications. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 27(1), 149–154 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.R. Napolitano, Aircraft Dynamics: From Modeling to Simulation (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.L. Crassidis, J.L. Junkins, Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inspection process following high load events. Technical Report 05-01, Aerospace Industry Association (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aeronautical Development Agency (Ministry of Defence)P. B. No. 1718, Vimanapura Post, Bengaluru 560017India
  2. 2.Machine Design Section, Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennai 600036India

Personalised recommendations