Advertisement

Weld Bead Geometry Dimensions Measurement based on Pixel Intensity by Image Analysis Techniques

  • Akhilesh Kumar SinghEmail author
  • Vidyut Dey
  • Ram Naresh Rai
  • Tapas Debnath
Case Study

Abstract

Weld bead geometry dimensions were measured by Image Analysis Techniques (IAT’s) help to analyze an image based on the intensity level of its pixels. Based on intensity level the desired information is extracted from the image. Various techniques in image analysis help in improving the quality of the image thereby help to retrieve the information that is being sought. In present study, Autogenous Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) bead-on-plate (BOP) welding was carried out on grade P-91 steel plates of size 100 mm × 50 mm × 6 mm. For welding, Taguchi’s L9 (33) orthogonal array design was adopted. The features like weld penetration, weld width and heat affected zone (HAZ) with their various subzones pixels intensity were measured by an IAT. The present IAT used the ordinary digital camera to capture the welded images. The dimensions of the weld features were compared to those measured by Leica-Q-win-V3 software. The study established that results in both methods were commensurate. Thus, the image analysis technique used in the study can be easily adopted for measurement of weld bead geometry as this method requires minimum human intervention and generates a complete picture of the weld profile.

Keywords

Sub-zones width dimension Weld parameters IAT and Taguchi L9 (3 × 3) 

References

  1. 1.
    M. El, C. Rayes, G.Sepold Walz, The influence of various hybrid welding parameters on bead geometry. Weld. J. 83(5), 147–153 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.A. Shirali, K.C. Mills, The effect of welding parameters on penetration in GTA welds. Weld. J. 72, 347 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ghosh, S. Chattopadhyaya, S. Hloch, Prediction of weld bead parameters, transient temperature distribution & HAZ width of submerged arc welded structural steel. Tech. Gaz. 19(3), 617–620 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. El Rayes, C. Walz, G. Sepold, The influence of various hybrid welding parameters on bead geometry, Supplement to the Welding Journal, Sponsored by the American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.T. Thao, I.S. Kim, Interaction model for predicting bead geometry for lab joint in GMA welding process. Int. Sci. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng. 1(4), 237–244 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.M.A. Hamza, A. Aloraier, E.A. Al-Faraj, Investigation effect of welding polarity in joint bead geometry and mechanical properties of shielded metal arc welding process. J. Eng. Technol. 1(3), 100–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Sathiya, S. Aravindan, P.M. Ajith, B. Arivazhagan, A.N. Haq, Microstructural characteristics on bead on plate welding of AISI 904 L super austenitic stainless steel using gas metal arc welding process. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2(6), 189–199 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Datta, A. Bandyopadhyay, P.K. Pal, Application of Taguchi philosophy for parametric optimization of bead geometry and HAZ width in submerged arc welding using a mixture of fresh flux and fused flux. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 36, 689–698 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.R. Neelamegam, V. Sapineni, V. Muthukumaran, J. Tamanna, Hybrid intelligent modeling for optimizing welding process parameters for reduced activation ferritic martensitic (RAFM) steel. J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl. 5(1), 39 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Om, S. Pandey, Effect of heat input on dilution and heat affected zone in submerged arc welding process. Indian Acad. Sci. Sadhana 38(6), 1369–1391 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Shoeb, M. Parvez, P. Kumari, Effect of MIG welding input process parameters on weld bead geometry on HSLA steel. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. (IJEST) 5(1), 200–212 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Dey, D.K. Pratihar, G.L. Datta, M.N. Jha, T.K. Saha, A.V. Bapat, Optimization of bead geometry in electron beam welding using a genetic algorithm. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 1151–1157 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V.K. Vasantha, N. Murugan, Effect of FCAW process parameters on weld bead geometry in stainless steel cladding. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 10(9), 827–842 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B.L. Shultz, C.E. Jackson, Influence of weld bead area on weld metal mechanical properties. Weld. Res. Suppl 52(1), 26–37 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y.S. Tarng, W.H. Yang, Optimisation of the weld bead geometry in gas tungsten arc welding by the Taguchi method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 14(8), 549–554 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Chen, B.A. Chin, Monitoring joint penetration using infrared sensing techniques. Weld. J. 67, 181s–185s (1988)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.C. Wikle, S. Kottilingam, R.H. Zee, B.A. Chin, Infrared sensing techniques for penetration depth control of the submerged arc welding process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 113, 228–233 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Menaka, M. Vasudevan, B. Venkatraman, B. Raj, Estimating bead width and depth of penetration during welding by infrared thermal imaging. J. Br. Inst. NDT 47(9), 564–568 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.S. Song, Y.M. Zhang, Measurement and analysis of three-dimensional specular gas tungsten arc weld pool surface, Welding Research, Supplement to the Welding Journal, Sponsored by the American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.K. Singh, T. Debnath, V. Dey, R.N. Rai, An approach to maximize weld penetration during TIG Welding of P91 steel plates by utilizing image processing and Taguchi orthogonal array. J. Inst. Eng. (India) Ser. C. 98(5), 541–551 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Mayr, Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties of the heat affected zone in B-containing 9% chromium steels. Dissertation is submitted for the Degree of ‘Doktor der technischen Wissenschaften’ at the Graz University of Technology, Austria, Graz, 11 July 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akhilesh Kumar Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vidyut Dey
    • 1
  • Ram Naresh Rai
    • 1
  • Tapas Debnath
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyAgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations