Advertisement

Performance Assessment of an Irrigation System in Tamil Nadu, India

  • K. PunithavelEmail author
  • N. Mahendran
Original Contribution
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Tamil Nadu in India has 7% of country’s population but 3% of surface water resource. About 40% of population lives below poverty line live in rural areas depending directly on agricultural activities during the year 2004–05. The state receives most of the rainfall during October to December. Hence, it is vital to conserve water when available. Most of the irrigation and power projects in Tamil Nadu came up before 1980 as a consequence of 5 years plans of Government of India. These projects were designed in such a way to suit the conditions prevailed during the years of implementation. As it is a fact that the water requirements and water availability change from time to time, the assessment of the present irrigation systems becomes necessary through which we get new strategies to implement, thereby satisfying the future demands. Hence, a study on the performance of the Palar–Porunthalar irrigation system in Tamil Nadu was taken up. The performances of the system since inception were studied. The crop water requirement for this irrigation system has been arrived based on duty area approach and followed till date from the year of inception. In this study, crop water requirement for the entire system was assessed using CROPWAT software. It is observed that twenty percent of water is saved by adopting this model. Also, for many years the water obtained during monsoons was either not sufficient or discharged as flood due to heavy intensity. The possibility of increasing the storage capacity of the dam was assessed using geographical information system (GIS) as it can make the system function more appropriate at times of flood. From this study, we come to know that the CROPWAT model has been more optimistic than the conventional method and the increase in dam height by 1.65 m is possible which in turn increases the storage capacity by 20 percent. It is observed that GIS serves as an effective tool for the management of irrigation system. The details of the data collected, analyses, methodology and strategies to be adopted are presented in this paper.

Keywords

Capacity Discharge Inflow Intensity Rainfall 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    A.J. Clemmens, Irrig. Drain. 55, 223–234 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Sakthivadivel, Assessment of performance and impact of irrigation and water resources systems in Taiwan and Sri Lanka. International Water Management Institute, Srilanka, Final Report (2001). ISBN: 92-9090-456-9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Nijman, A management perspective on the performance of the irrigation subsector. International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI), Colombo, Srilanka, (1993) DDC 631.7. ISBN: 90-6754-280-6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I.W. Makin, H. Goldsmith, J.C. Skutsch, Irrig. Drain Syst. 5, 31–42 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ortega, JF., Targuelo, JM., Juan, JA. International commission of Agricultural Engineering E Journal vol. 4, LW 01007 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakthivadivel, R., Gomathinayagam, P. Rehabilitation and management of tanks in India—Asian development bank report 2006. Publication Stock No. 122605 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Sakthivadivel, C. de Fraiture, D.J. Molden, C. Perry, W. Kloezen, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 15, 161–179 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629948998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Soundharajan, K.P. Sudheer, Irrigation management for rice using crop growth simulation model in an optimization framework. Paddy Water Environ. J. 7, 135–149 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-009-0156-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.-F. Kuo, S.-S. Ho, C.-W. Liu, Agric. Water Manag. 82, 433–451 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Mishra, A. Anand, R. Singh, N.S.J. Raghuwanshi, Irrig. Drain Eng. 127, 27–34 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:1(27) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L.S. Pereira, T. Oweis, A. Zairi, Agric. Water Manag. 57, 175–206 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00075-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.M.D. Azamathullah, S.M. Narulkar, Real-time operation for irrigation—a case study. In: International Conference on Managing Rivers in the 21st Century: Solutions Towards Sustainable River Basins (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bryant, K.J., Benson, V.W., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., Lacewell, R.D. Simulating corn yield response to irrigation timings:Validation of the EPIC model. J. Prod. Agric. 5, 237–242.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1992.0237 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.J. Zwart, L.M.C. Leelert, Irrig. Sci. 28, 371–385 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0199-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D.H. Murray-Rust, W.B. Snellen, Report on performance assessment and diagnosis in irrigation system in Asia, Africa and South America. International Water Management Institute, Srilanka. (1993) DDC: 631.7. ISBN: 92-9090-192-6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institution of Engineers (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Building Quality Control Division, P.W.D.ChennaiIndia
  2. 2.PSNA College of Engineering and TechnologyDindigulIndia

Personalised recommendations