Single Marker Analysis and Mapping of QTLs Governing Fruit Weight in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)

  • N. Bhanushree
  • Partha SahaEmail author
  • Bhoopal Singh Tomar
  • S. Gopala Krishnan
  • Bishal Gurung
  • Chandrika Ghoshal
  • Anilabha Das Munshi
Research Article


Eggplant is one of the most popular solanaceous vegetable crops in India and across the world. Development of high-yielding varieties and hybrids is the major focus of breeders. Yield is a very complex trait affected by various genetic and external factors. The lack of knowledge of the inheritance of fruit traits in eggplant has limited the use of molecular markers to fasten breeding programme. The authors conducted the present investigation at the research field of Vegetable Science Division, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi, India. A total of 168 F2 plants derived from Pusa Safed Baingan 1 × Pusa Uttam were phenotyped for fruit weight. Wide variations were observed for this trait ranging from 15.2 to 248.3 g, and the skewness was less than 1, suggesting that the trait followed a normal distribution in F2 and suitable for QTL analysis. Polymorphism survey using 241 SSR markers showed 18 polymorphic markers, which were subjected to bulked segregant analysis. Single-marker analysis using genotypic data revealed the positions of 3 QTLs influencing fruit weight. One QTL (qsfwpu1) was detected in linkage group 1, and two QTLs (qsfwpu3 and qsfwpu2) were identified in linkage group 4. These QTLs explained 14.06–19.44% to total phenotypic variation and were classified as major QTLs, suggesting that these QTLs play an important role in controlling yield. These QTLs may be very useful in the future molecular marker-assisted breeding of eggplant to develop a variety and cloning of target genes of interest.


Eggplant Fruit weight QTL Marker assisted selection 



The authors are thankful to the postgraduate school, IARI, New Delhi, for the financial support and Head, Division of Vegetable Science, for providing field and laboratory facilities.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Swarup V (2005) Vegetable science and technology in India. Kalyani Publisher, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chattopadhyay DK, Webster DC (2009) Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Prog Polym Sci 34(10):1068–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daunay MC, Janick J (2007) History and iconography of eggplant. Chron Horticult 47:16–22Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daunay MC, Lester RN, Gebhardt G, Hennart JW, Jahn M, Frary A, Doganlar S (2001) Genetic resources of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and allied species: a new challenge for molecular geneticists and eggplant breeders. In: Van den berg RG, Barendse GW, Mariani C (eds) Solanaceae V. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen, pp 251–274Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    NHB (2015) National horticulture database. National Horticultural Board, Gurugram, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poehlman JM, Sleper DA (1995) Methods in plant breeding. Breed field crops. Iowa University Press, Ames, pp 172–174Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acquaah G (2007) Principles of plant genetics and breeding, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nunome T, Yoshida T, Hirai M (1998) Genetic linkage map of eggplant. In: Proceedings of the 10th Eucarpia meeting on genetics and breeding of Capsicum and eggplant, Avignon France, pp 239–242Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nunome T, Ishiguro K, Yoshida T, Hirai M (2001) Mapping of fruit shape and colour development traits in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) based on RADP and AFLP markers. Breed Sci 51:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nunome T, Suwabe K, Iketani H, Hirai M (2003) Identification and characterization of microsatellites in eggplant. Plant Breed 122:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nunome T, Negoro S, Kono I, Kanamori H, Miyatake K, Yamaguchi H, Ohyama A, Fukuoka H (2009) Development of SSR markers derived from SSR-enriched genomic library of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Theor Appl Genet 119:1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fukuoka H, Miyatake K, Nunome T, Negoro S, Shirasawa K, Isobe S, Asamizu E, Yamaguchi H, Ohyama A (2012) Development of gene-based markers and construction of an integrated linkage map in eggplant by using Solanum orthologous (SOL) gene sets. Theor Appl Genet 125:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD (2002) a) A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161:1697–1711PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu F, Eannetta NT, Xu Y, Tanksley SD (2009) A detailed synteny map of the eggplant genome based on conserved ortholog set II (COSII) markers. Theor Appl Genet 118:927–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frary A, Frary A, Daunay MC, Huvenaars K, Mank R, Doğanlar S (2014) QTL hotspots in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) detected with a high resolution map and CIM analysis. Euphytica 197:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gramazio P, Prohens J, Plazas M, Andújar I, Herraiz FJ, Castillo E, Knapp S, Meyer RS, Vilanova S (2014) Location of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis pathway and polyphenol oxidase genes in a new interspecific anchored linkage map of eggplant. BMC Plant Biol 14:350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toppino L, Barchi L, Lo Scalzo R, Palazzolo E, Francese G, Fibiani M, D’Alessandro A, Papa V, Laudicina VA, Sabatino L, Pulcini L (2016) Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting biochemical and morphological fruit properties in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Front Plant Sci 7:256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 8:4321–4325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2007) Windows QTL cartographer 2.5.
  20. 20.
    Smulders MJM, Bredemeijer G, Rus-Kortekaas W, Arens P, Vosman B (1997) Use of short microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersiconesculentum cultivars and accessions of other Lycopersicon species. Theor Appl Genet 94:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landry BS, Hubert N, Crete R, Chang MS, Lincoln SE, Etoh T (1992) A genetic map for Brassica oleracea based on RFLP markers detected with expressed DNA sequences and mapping of resistance genes to race 2 of Plasmodiophora brassicae (Woronin). Genome 35:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanhuanpää PK, Vilkki JP, Vilkki HJ (1995) Association of a RAPD marker with linolenic acid concentration in the seed oil of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Genome 38:414–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van der Knaap E, Tanksley SD (2001) Identification and characterization of a novel locus controlling early fruit development in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 103:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV (1991) Identification of markers closely linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 88:9828–9832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang GL, Paterson AH (1994) Assessment of DNA pooling strategies for mapping of QTLs. Theor Appl Genet 88:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Govindaraj P, Arumugachamy S, Maheswaran M (2005) Bulked segregant analysis to detect main effect QTL associated with grain quality parameters in Basmati 370/ASD16 cross in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using SSR markers. Euphytica 144:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tuberosa R, Sanguineti MC, Landi P, Salvi S, Casarini E, Conti S (1998) RFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling abscisic acid concentration in leaves of drought-stressed maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 97:744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Quarrie SA, Lazić-Jančić V, Kovačević D, Steed A, Pekić S (1999) Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. J Exp Bot 50:1299–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Selvaraj MG, Narayana M, Schubert AM, Ayers JL, Baring MR, Burow MD (2009) Identification of QTLs for pod and kernel traits in cultivated peanut by bulked segregant analysis. Electron J Biotechnol 12(2):3–4Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Darvasi A, Soller M (1995) Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic mapping. Genetics 141:1199–1207PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Price A (2006) Believe it or not, QTL are accurate! Trends Plant Sci 11:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hodges SA, Arnold ML (1995) Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key evolutionary innovation? Proc Biol Sci 262:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faino L, Azizinia S, Hassanzadeh BH, Verzaux E, Ercolano MR, Visser RG, Bai Y (2012) Fine mapping of two major QTLs conferring resistance to powdery mildew in tomato. Euphytica 184:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Asins MJ (2002) Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 121:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay M, Lester R, Tanksley S (2002) Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161:1713–1726PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Frary A, Doganlar S, Daunay MC, Tanksley SD (2003) QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant and implications for conservation of gene function during evolution of Solanaceous species. Theor Appl Genet 107(2):359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK (2005) An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142:169–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu R, Gao Y, Zhang Q (2014) Quantitative trait locus mapping of floral and related traits using an F2 population of Aquilegia. Plant Breed 133:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barrero LS, Tanksley SD (2004) Evaluating the genetic basis of multiple-locule fruit in a broad cross section of tomato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 109(3):669–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Foolad MR (2007) Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. Int J Plant Genom. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Portis E, Barchi L, Toppino L, Lanteri S, Acciarri N (2014) QTL mapping in eggplant reveals clusters of yield related loci and orthology with the tomato genome. PLoS ONE 9(2):89499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The National Academy of Sciences, India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Bhanushree
    • 1
  • Partha Saha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bhoopal Singh Tomar
    • 1
  • S. Gopala Krishnan
    • 2
  • Bishal Gurung
    • 3
  • Chandrika Ghoshal
    • 1
  • Anilabha Das Munshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Vegetable ScienceICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute (IARI)New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Division of GeneticsICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute (IARI)New DelhiIndia
  3. 3.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations