Applicability of SCoT and SSR Molecular Markers for Genetic Diversity Analysis in Chrysanthemum morifolium Genotypes
- 48 Downloads
Chrysanthemum is ranked second among the most economically important cut flowers after rose. This flower is considered very significant from different aspects of commercial herbs and traditional medicine. In this study, 30 simple sequence repeat (SSR) and 8 start codon targeted polymorphism (SCoT) markers were used to assess the genetic diversity of 32 cultivated varieties of C. morifolium. In total, 127 alleles were detected. The average number of alleles per marker locus was 2.13 for SSR (ranging from 1 to 4) and 7.78 for SCoT markers (ranging from 1 to 18). A positive significant correlation between similarity matrices was obtained by the two markers. Average PIC values for SSR and SCoT markers were 0.37 and 0.34, respectively. The results of clustering for both marker systems divided the genotypes into four clusters. These findings revealed that the efficiency of SSR and SCoT markers was relatively the same in fingerprinting of chrysanthemum genotypes. The authors performed combination of SCoT and SSR markers as a novel method to assess genetic diversity in chrysanthemum. Further implications of the results could be used in germplasm conservation and enhancing the genetic base of the breeding programs of C. morifolium.
KeywordsChrysanthemum Genetic diversity SSR SCoT Fingerprinting
The authors are grateful to the Department of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology of Shahid Beheshti University for providing financial support for this project work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among the authors to publish this manuscript.
- 2.Kafi M, Ghahsareh M (2009) Floriculture, vol 1, 4th edn. Jahad Press, Tehran, pp 108–118Google Scholar
- 3.Al-qurainy F, Salim K, Mohammad N, Mohamed T (2015) SCoT marker for the assessment of genetic diversity in Saudi Arabian date palm cultivars. Pak J Bot 47(2):637–643Google Scholar
- 6.Hartl DL, Jones EW (2005) Genetics: analysis of genes and genomes. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, SudburyGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hajibarat Z, Saidi A, Hajibarat Z, Talebi R (2014) Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of landrace and improved chickpea (Cicer Arietinum) genotypes using morphological and microsatellite markers. Environ Exp Biol 12:161–166Google Scholar
- 11.Hajibarat Z, Saidi A, Hajibarat Z, Talebi R (2015) Characterization of genetic diversity in chickpea using SSR markers, start codon targeted polymorphism (SCoT) and conserved DNA-derived polymorphism (CDDP). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21(3):365–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-015-0306-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Yuan W, Ye S, Du L, Li S, Miao X, Shang F (2016) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Dendranthema morifolium (Asteraceae) using next-generation sequencing. Genet Mol Res 15(4):1–7Google Scholar
- 19.Zhang Y, Chen W (2013) Assessing the genetic diversity of chrysanthemum cultivars with microsatellites. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 138(6):479–486Google Scholar
- 24.Pirttilä MA, Hirsikorpi M, Kämäräinen T, Jaakola L, Hohtola A (2001) DNA isolation methods for medicinal and aromatic plants. Int Soc Plant Mol Biol 19:273a–273fGoogle Scholar
- 25.Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) User manual for SplitsTree4 V4.13.1. Mol Biol Evol 2 (23):254–267. software available from www. splitstree.orgGoogle Scholar
- 26.Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-Pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Publications, SetauketGoogle Scholar
- 30.Heikrujam M, Kumar J, Agrawal V (2015) Genetic diversity analysis among male and female jojoba genotypes employing gene targeted molecular markers, start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism and CAAT box-derived polymorphism (CBDP) markers. MetaGene 5:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar