Exploring the Efficiency of Native Tree Species Grown at Mine Tailings for Phytoextraction of Lead and Iron
- 55 Downloads
Four (4) prominently growing tropical tree species were screened for their tolerance to heavy metals and evaluated for their suitability for remediation, at a contaminated site. The partitioning of Iron (Fe) and Lead (Pb) between roots and above-ground aerial parts of the trees, bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) were used to determine the remediation potential of the studied trees. Ficus racemosa recorded the highest BCF for both the metals, Fe and Pb. The maximum TF was recorded in T. arjuna for Fe and F. racemosa had the highest TF value for Pb. The recorded BCF and TF values suggested that these tropical tree species can be classified as efficient metal trappers for Fe and Pb. The Pb accumulation was much higher in all the four (4) tree species than the described limit for a Pb-hyperaccumulator (0.1%), revealing the hyperaccumulator potency of all the screened trees.
KeywordsDalbergia sissoo Ficus racemosa Pithecellobium dulce Phytoremediation Terminalia arjuna
The study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi in the form of DST INSPIRE (DST Inspire/IF-150198/2015) and DST-FIST (Sl. No. 270 for tenure of 2013–18). It is also supported financially by University Grants Commission, New Delhi in the form of Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship (F1-17.1/2013-14/RGNF-2013-14-SC-CHH-36789).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript.
- 2.Dalun T, Fan Z, Wende Y, Fang X, Wenhua X, Xiangwen D, Guangjun W, Changhui P (2008) Heavy metal accumulation by panicled goldenrain tree (Koelreuteria paniculata) and common elaeocarpous (Elaeocarpus decipens) in abandoned mine soils in southern China. J Environ Sci 21:340–345Google Scholar
- 11.Pennock D, Yates T, Braidek J (1993) Soil sampling designs. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 25–38Google Scholar
- 13.Baker DE, Amacher MC (1982) Nickel, copper, zinc and cadmium. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, chemical and microbiological properties. ASA Inc. SSSA Inc. Publishers, New York, pp 323–336Google Scholar
- 14.Jones JB Jr, Wolf B, Mills HA (1991) Plant analysis handbook. Micro-Macro Publishing, AthensGoogle Scholar
- 16.Carrillo-Chávez A, Salas-Megchún E, Levresse G, Muñoz-Torres C, Pérez-Arvizu O, Gerke T (2014) Geochemistry and mineralogy of mine-waste material from a “skarn-type” deposit in central Mexico: modeling geochemical controls of metals in the surface environment. J Geochem Explor 144:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mleczek M, Goliński P, Krzesłowska M, Gąsecka M, Magdziak Z, Rutkowski P, Budzyńska S, Waliszewska B, Kozubik T, Karolewski Z, Niedzielski P (2017) Phytoextraction of potentially toxic elements by six tree species growing on hazardous mining sludge. Environ Sci Pollut R 24(28):22183–22195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2000) Metal accumulating plants. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New York, pp 193–229Google Scholar
- 29.Wang Y, Bai S, Wu J, Chen J, Yang Y, Zhu X, Zhu T (2015) Plumbum/zinc accumulation in seedlings of six afforestation species cultivated in mine spoil substrate. J Trop For Sci 27(2):166–175Google Scholar